Mean Field Models to Regulate Carbon Emissions in Electricity Production

The most serious threat to ecosystems is the global climate change fueled by the uncontrolled increase in carbon emissions. In this project, we use mean field control and mean field game models to analyze and inform the decisions of electricity producers on how much renewable sources of production ought to be used in the presence of a carbon tax. The trade-off between higher revenues from production and the negative externality of carbon emissions is quantified for each producer who needs to balance in real time reliance on reliable but polluting (fossil fuel) thermal power stations versus investing in and depending upon clean production from uncertain wind and solar technologies. We compare the impacts of these decisions in two different scenarios: (1) the producers are competitive and hopefully reach a Nash equilibrium; (2) they cooperate and reach a social optimum. In the model, the producers have both time dependent and independent controls. We first propose nonstandard forward–backward stochastic differential equation systems that characterize the Nash equilibrium and the social optimum. Then, we prove that both problems have a unique solution using these equations. We then illustrate with numerical experiments the producers’ behavior in each scenario. We further introduce and analyze the impact of a regulator in control of the carbon tax policy, and we study the resulting Stackelberg equilibrium with the field of producers.

[1]  Roland P. Malhamé,et al.  A Dynamic Collective Choice Model with an Advertiser , 2016, 2016 IEEE 55th Conference on Decision and Control (CDC).

[2]  Peter E. Caines,et al.  Large population stochastic dynamic games: closed-loop McKean-Vlasov systems and the Nash certainty equivalence principle , 2006, Commun. Inf. Syst..

[3]  J. Ma,et al.  Forward-Backward Stochastic Differential Equations and their Applications , 2007 .

[4]  Thibaut Mastrolia,et al.  Mean–field moral hazard for optimal energy demand response management , 2019, Mathematical Finance.

[5]  R. Carmona,et al.  FBSDEs and the Solution of MFGs Without Common Noise , 2018 .

[6]  A. Bensoussan,et al.  Mean Field Games with a Dominating Player , 2014, 1404.4148.

[7]  Max Fehr,et al.  The Clean Development Mechanism and Joint Price Formation for Allowances and CERs , 2011 .

[8]  Mathieu Lauriere,et al.  Numerical Methods for Mean Field Games and Mean Field Type Control , 2021, Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Mathematics.

[9]  D. Jacobson New conditions for boundedness of the solution of a matrix Riccati differential equation , 1970 .

[10]  Kaitong Hu The Wellposedness of Path-dependent Multidimensional Forward-backward SDE , 2019, 1908.09208.

[11]  Xinyu Wang,et al.  Modeling and Computation of Mean Field Equilibria in Producers' Game with Emission Permits Trading , 2015, Commun. Nonlinear Sci. Numer. Simul..

[12]  Sebastian Jaimungal,et al.  A Mean-Field Game Approach to Equilibrium Pricing, Optimal Generation, and Trading in Solar Renewable Energy Certificate (SREC) Markets , 2020, ArXiv.

[13]  René Carmona,et al.  Market Design for Emission Trading Schemes , 2010, SIAM Rev..

[14]  A. Bensoussan,et al.  Mean Field Games and Mean Field Type Control Theory , 2013 .

[15]  P. Lions,et al.  A class of short-term models for the oil industry addressing speculative storage , 2020, 2003.11790.

[16]  Mathieu Lauriere,et al.  Optimal Incentives to Mitigate Epidemics: A Stackelberg Mean Field Game Approach , 2020, SIAM Journal of Control and Optimization.

[17]  Anis Matoussi,et al.  An Extended Mean Field Game for Storage in Smart Grids , 2017, J. Optim. Theory Appl..

[18]  Hamidou Tembine,et al.  Electricity Price Dynamics in the Smart Grid : A Mean-Field-Type Game Perspective , 2018 .

[19]  Huyên Pham,et al.  A McKean–Vlasov approach to distributed electricity generation development , 2020, Math. Methods Oper. Res..

[20]  P. Lions,et al.  Mean field games , 2007 .

[21]  A. Haurie,et al.  Limit Game Models for Climate Change Negotiations , 2016 .

[22]  Olivier Guéant,et al.  Mean Field Games and Oil Production , 2010 .

[23]  Ronnie Sircar,et al.  Fracking, Renewables, and Mean Field Games , 2017, SIAM Rev..

[24]  Peiqi Wang,et al.  Finite-State Contract Theory with a Principal and a Field of Agents , 2018, Manag. Sci..

[25]  René Carmona,et al.  Optimal Stochastic Control and Carbon Price Formation , 2009, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[26]  Romuald Elie,et al.  A Tale of a Principal and Many, Many Agents , 2016, Math. Oper. Res..

[27]  René Carmona,et al.  Probabilistic Analysis of Mean-field Games , 2013 .

[28]  P. Tankov,et al.  The entry and exit game in the electricity markets: A mean-field game approach , 2020, Journal of Dynamics & Games.

[29]  R. Carmona,et al.  Forward-Backward Stochastic Differential Equations and Controlled McKean Vlasov Dynamics , 2013, 1303.5835.

[30]  M. Micenko Fracking , 2019, Preview.