Facial aesthetics: 2. Clinical assessment.

UNLABELLED The clinical ability to alter dentofacial form requires an understanding of facial aesthetics. This is vital for any clinician involved in treatment that will alter a patient's dentofacial appearance, whether through orthodontics, facial growth modification, corrective jaw surgery or aesthetic dentistry. Part 1 of this article covered the historical and theoretical aspects of facial aesthetics and their importance in contemporary dentofacial treatment. Part 2 covers important aspects of the interview and clinical assessment of patients requiring alterations in their dentofacial appearance, including guidelines used in the assessment of facial proportions and symmetry. CLINICAL RELEVANCE These articles cover the theoretical and clinical aspects of facial aesthetics required by clinicians involved in the treatment of dentofacial deformity.

[1]  William B. Downs,et al.  Analysis of the Dentofacial Profile , 2009 .

[2]  N. Bass Measurement of the profile angle and the aesthetic analysis of the facial profile. , 2003, Journal of orthodontics.

[3]  C. Steiner Cephalometrics for you and me , 1953 .

[4]  S. Bishara,et al.  Dental and facial asymmetries: a review. , 2009, The Angle orthodontist.

[5]  S. Cunningham The psychology of facial appearance. , 1999, Dental update.

[6]  G. W. Arnett,et al.  Soft tissue cephalometric analysis: diagnosis and treatment planning of dentofacial deformity. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[7]  S. Bishara Textbook of orthodontics , 2014 .

[8]  David M. Sarver,et al.  Contemporary Treatment of Dentofacial Deformity , 2002 .

[9]  H. Kiyak,et al.  Comparing the perception of dentists and lay people to altered dental esthetics. , 1999, Journal of esthetic dentistry.

[10]  H. Broder,et al.  Dentofacial disharmony: psychological status of patients seeking treatment consultation. , 1998, The Angle orthodontist.

[11]  Coenraad F. A. Moorrees,et al.  Natural head position, a basic consideration in the interpretation of cephalometric radiographs , 1958 .

[12]  R. Bergman,et al.  Cephalometric soft tissue facial analysis. , 1999, American journal of orthodontics and dentofacial orthopedics : official publication of the American Association of Orthodontists, its constituent societies, and the American Board of Orthodontics.

[13]  Robert M. Ricketts,et al.  A foundation for cephalometric communication , 1960 .

[14]  L L Merrifield,et al.  The profile line as an aid in critically evaluating facial esthetics. , 1966, American journal of orthodontics.