Hand–object interaction in perspective

We investigated the effect of perspective on the recognition of actions, without using motor preparation. Photographs of a hand wearing a glove were presented as primes, followed by photographs of the same hand interacting with an object. Both primes and targets were shown in egocentric or non-egocentric perspective. Participants had to decide whether or not the hand interacted with the object in a sensible way. In order to increase the similarity between the perceived and the enacted movement, half of the participants were required to wear a glove while responding. We found an advantage of the egocentric over the non-egocentric perspective for targets in the Glove condition. The advantage of the egocentric perspective was present for primes as well, even though the effect was limited to the No Glove condition. Results are discussed in the framework of the recent literature on mirror neurons and body schema.

[1]  L C Katz,et al.  Development of horizontal projections in layer 2/3 of ferret visual cortex. , 1996, Cerebral cortex.

[2]  Luciano Fadiga,et al.  Hand action preparation influences the responses to hand pictures , 2002, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  Sandro Rubichi,et al.  Are visual stimuli sufficient to evoke motor information? Studies with hand primes , 2007, Neuroscience Letters.

[4]  S. Aglioti,et al.  The body in the brain: neural bases of corporeal awareness , 1997, Trends in Neurosciences.

[5]  M. Corbetta,et al.  Extrastriate body area in human occipital cortex responds to the performance of motor actions , 2004, Nature Neuroscience.

[6]  Lindsey J. Powell,et al.  My body or yours? The effect of visual perspective on cortical body representations. , 2006, Cerebral cortex.

[7]  M. Jeannerod,et al.  Looking for the agent: an investigation into consciousness of action and self-consciousness in schizophrenic patients , 1997, Cognition.

[8]  K. Jellinger.  Motor Cognition What Actions Tell the Self , 2007 .

[9]  W. Prinz.  Perception and Action Planning , 1997 .

[10]  G. Fink,et al.  Neural correlates of the first-person-perspective , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[11]  Michael Erb,et al.  The neural correlates of perceiving one's own movements , 2003, NeuroImage.

[12]  G. Holmes,et al.  Sensory disturbances from cerebral lesions , 1911 .

[13]  J. H. Wilkinson,et al.  Error analysis , 2003 .

[14]  J. Decety,et al.  Effect of subjective perspective taking during simulation of action: a PET investigation of agency , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[15]  G. Aschersleben,et al.  The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): a framework for perception and action planning. , 2001, The Behavioral and brain sciences.

[16]  M. Iacoboni,et al.  The mirror neuron system and the consequences of its dysfunction , 2006, Nature Reviews Neuroscience.

[17]  Andrew N. Meltzoff,et al.  Neural circuits involved in imitation and perspective-taking , 2006, NeuroImage.

[18]  A. Borghi,et al.  Body image and body schema: The shared representation of body image and the role of dynamic body schema in perspective and imitation , 2007, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[19]  MARION E. KALKMAN,et al.  Recognizing , 1968 .

[20]  S. Vogt,et al.  Visuomotor priming by pictures of hand postures: perspective matters , 2003, Neuropsychologia.

[21]  G. Rizzolatti,et al.  Understanding motor events: a neurophysiological study , 2004, Experimental Brain Research.

[22]  Andreas Wohlschläger,et al.  Simulating biological and non-biological motion , 2008, Brain and Cognition.

[23]  M. Farah,et al.  The psychological reality of the body schema: a test with normal participants. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[24]  P. Haggard,et al.  The brain’s fingers and hands , 2006, Experimental Brain Research.

[25]  N. Kanwisher,et al.  The Human Body , 2001 .

[26]  Michael P. Kaschak,et al.  Grounding language in action , 2002, Psychonomic bulletin & review.