The impacts of examples on creative design : explaining fixation and stimulation effects

Converging evidences have indicated that the ability to generate creative ideas could be limited by recently activated knowledge such as examples of solutions. However, neuroimaging studies have recently demonstrated that exposure to examples did not systematically lead to fixation and could on the contrary have a stimulation effect on creativity. Our hypothesis is that there are two types of examples that C-K theory helps to characterize: (1) restrictive examples that do not change the definition or the attributes of the object, and (2) expansive examples that modify its identity by adding unexpected attributes. In two studies, we explored the impact of restrictive and expansive examples on a creative task. We then hypothesized that the introduction of an example during the task would provoke participants to propose solutions of a higher originality when the provided example was expansive. In contrast, when the provided example was restrictive, we hypothesized that the originality of the solutions would be reduced. Results confirmed that solutions proposed by the group exposed to restrictive example are less original than those given by groups exposed to expansive examples.

[1]  R. Adamson Functional fixedness as related to problem solving; a repetition of three experiments. , 1952, Journal of experimental psychology.

[2]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  A NEW APPROACH OF INNOVATIVE DESIGN : AN INTRODUCTION TO C-K THEORY. , 2003 .

[3]  Andreas Fink,et al.  Enhancing creativity by means of cognitive stimulation: Evidence from an fMRI study , 2010, NeuroImage.

[4]  Armand Hatchuel,et al.  C-K design theory: an advanced formulation , 2008 .

[5]  Thomas J. Howard,et al.  The use of creative stimuli at early stages of industrial product innovation , 2010 .

[6]  D. Kahneman,et al.  Frames and brains: elicitation and control of response tendencies , 2007, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[7]  Mathieu Cassotti,et al.  How to explain receptivity to conjunction-fallacy inhibition training: Evidence from the Iowa Gambling Task , 2010, Brain and Cognition.

[8]  Steven M. Smith,et al.  Constraining effects of examples in a creative generation task , 1993, Memory & cognition.

[9]  Cynthia M. Sifonis,et al.  The Role of Specificity and Abstraction in Creative Idea Generation , 2004 .

[10]  K. Duncker,et al.  On problem-solving , 1945 .

[11]  Margaret Anne Defeyter,et al.  Acquiring an understanding of design: evidence from children's insight problem solving , 2003, Cognition.

[12]  Sabine Windmann,et al.  Creative cognition: the diverse operations and the prospect of applying a cognitive neuroscience perspective. , 2007, Methods.

[13]  K. Dugosh,et al.  Cognitive and social comparison processes in brainstorming , 2005 .