Swarms on the 3-sphere with adaptive synapses: Hebbian and anti-Hebbian learning rule

Abstract We introduce and analyze several models of swarm dynamics on the sphere S 3 with adaptive (state-dependent) interactions between agents. The equations describing the interaction dynamics are variations of the classical Hebbian principle from Neuroscience. We study asymptotic behavior in models with various realizations of Hebbian and anti-Hebbian learning rules. The swarm with the Hebbian rule and strictly nonnegative (attractive) interactions evolves towards consensus. If the Hebbian rule allows both attractive and repulsive interactions the swarm converges to bipolar configuration. The most interesting is the model with anti-Hebbian learning rule with both attractive and repulsive interactions. This model displays a rich variety of dynamical regimes and stationary formations, depending on the number of agents and system parameters. We prove that the model with such anti-Hebbian rule evolves towards a stable stationary configuration if the system parameter is above a certain bifurcation threshold. Finally, some simulation results are presented demonstrating how these theoretical results can be applied to coordination of rotating bodies in 3D space; this is done by mapping the trajectories from S 3 to special orthogonal group SO(3).

[1]  Naomi Ehrich Leonard,et al.  Stabilization of Planar Collective Motion: All-to-All Communication , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[2]  Robert W. Hölzel,et al.  Stability and Long Term Behavior of a Hebbian Network of Kuramoto Oscillators , 2015, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst..

[3]  R. Olfati-Saber,et al.  Swarms on Sphere: A Programmable Swarm with Synchronous Behaviors like Oscillator Networks , 2006, Proceedings of the 45th IEEE Conference on Decision and Control.

[4]  M. A. Lohe Non-Abelian Kuramoto models and synchronization , 2009 .

[5]  B. Piccoli,et al.  A nonlinear model of opinion formation on the sphere , 2015 .

[6]  Alain Sarlette,et al.  Geometry and Symmetries in Coordination Control , 2009 .

[7]  Johan Thunberg,et al.  Almost Global Consensus on the $n$ -Sphere , 2016, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[8]  Rodolphe Sepulchre,et al.  Consensus on Nonlinear Spaces , 2010 .

[9]  Wei Li,et al.  Corrigendum: Collective Motion of Swarming Agents Evolving on a Sphere Manifold: A Fundamental Framework and Characterization , 2015, Scientific Reports.

[10]  Alain Sarlette,et al.  Consensus Optimization on Manifolds , 2008, SIAM J. Control. Optim..

[11]  M. A. Lohe Quantum synchronization over quantum networks , 2010 .

[12]  L Q English,et al.  Synchronization in phase-coupled Kuramoto oscillator networks with axonal delay and synaptic plasticity. , 2013, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[13]  Jürgen Kurths,et al.  Synchronization - A Universal Concept in Nonlinear Sciences , 2001, Cambridge Nonlinear Science Series.

[14]  Wei Li,et al.  Unified Cooperative Control of Multiple Agents on a Sphere for Different Spherical Patterns , 2014, IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control.

[15]  Seung-Yeal Ha,et al.  Synchronization of Kuramoto Oscillators with Adaptive Couplings , 2016, SIAM J. Appl. Dyn. Syst..