Methods of peer assessment.

[1]  A. Lewin,et al.  Peer Nominations: A Model, Literature Critique and a Paradigm for Research. , 1976 .

[2]  Francis F. Medland,et al.  Evaluation of a peer rating system for predicting subsequent promotion of senior military officers. , 1976 .

[3]  Gary P. Latham,et al.  Training managers to minimize rating errors in the observation of behavior. , 1975 .

[4]  G. Kaufman.  Comments on Downey's note: Discussion and further analysis of the differential validities of peer nomination scales. , 1975 .

[5]  R. Downey.  Note on the Kaufman and Johnson studies of the differential validities of peer nomination techniques. , 1975 .

[6]  R. G. Swanson,et al.  Relation between peer perception of leader behavior and instructor-pilot performance. , 1975, The Journal of applied psychology.

[7]  Allen I. Kraut,et al.  Prediction of managerial success by peer and training-staff ratings. , 1975 .

[8]  Walter C. Borman,et al.  The rating of individuals in organizations: An alternate approach , 1974 .

[9]  Richard J. Klimoski,et al.  Role of the rater in performance appraisal. , 1974 .

[10]  Charles L. Hulin,et al.  An experimental evaluation of a temporal decay in the prediction of performance , 1973 .

[11]  Eugene C. Mayfield.  Value of peer nominations in predicting life insurance sales performance. , 1972 .

[12]  Karl E. Weick,et al.  Managerial behavior, performance, and effectiveness , 1971 .

[13]  S. Sharan,et al.  Peer nomiations as a predictor of multistage promotions in a ramified organization. , 1970 .

[14]  Eugene C. Mayfield.  MANAGEMENT SELECTION: BUDDY NOMINATIONS REVISITED , 1970 .

[15]  L. K. Waters,et al.  Peer nominations as predictors of short-term sales performance. , 1970, The Journal of applied psychology.

[16]  J. Richard Hackman,et al.  Prediction of First-Year Graduate Success in Psychology: Peer Ratings , 1969 .

[17]  L. Gordon.  Estimating the Reliability of Peer Ratings , 1969 .

[18]  W. T. Norman,et al.  Ratee relevance in peer nominations. , 1969, The Journal of applied psychology.

[19]  Norman E. Freeberg,et al.  Relevance of rater-ratee acquaintance in the validity and reliability of ratings. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[20]  Gene M. Smith.  Usefulness of Peer Ratings of Personality in Educational Research , 1967 .

[21]  E. Lawler,et al.  The multitrait-multirater approach to measuring managerial job performance. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[22]  Anderson Rb,et al.  Two problems involved in the use of peer-rating scales and some observations on Kendall's coefficient of concordance. , 1967 .

[23]  V B Cline,et al.  Prediction of creativity and other performance measures from biographical information among pharmaceutical scientists. , 1967, The Journal of applied psychology.

[24]  Paul D. Nelson,et al.  CRITERION MEASURES FOR EXTREMELY ISOLATED GROUPS , 1966 .

[25]  Hollander Ep.  Validity of peer nominations in predicting a distant performance criterion. , 1965 .

[26]  C. Coombs.  A theory of data. , 1965, Psychological review.

[27]  L. Gordon,et al.  The Cross‐Group Stability Of Peer Ratings Of Leadership Potential , 1965 .

[28]  P. C. Smith,et al.  Retranslation of expectations: An approach to the construction of unambiguous anchors for rating scales. , 1963 .

[29]  J. Dejung,et al.  Some differential effects of race of rater and ratee on early peer ratings of combat aptitude. , 1962 .

[30]  Richard E. Doll,et al.  IMPROVING THE PREDICTIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF PEER RATINGS , 1962 .

[31]  Niels C. Wodder,et al.  An Analysis of Peer Ratings , 1962 .

[32]  H. Turk.  Instrumental and Expressive Ratings Reconsidered , 1961 .

[33]  W. W. Willingham.  On Deriving Standard Scores for Peer Nominations with Subgroups of Unequal Size , 1959 .

[34]  C. Bartlett.  The relationships between self-ratings and peer ratings on a leadership behavior scale / , 1959 .

[35]  W. W. Willingham.  Estimating the Internal Consistency of Mutual Peer Nominations , 1959 .

[36]  J. Krumboltz,et al.  Racial Bias in Peer Ratings of Basic Airmen , 1958 .

[37]  J. Weitz.  Selecting Supervisors with Peer Ratings , 1958 .

[38]  E. Hollander,et al.  The reliability of peer nominations under various conditions of administration. , 1957 .

[39]  George A. Theodorson.  THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN LEADERSHIP AND POPULARITY ROLES IN SMALL GROUPS , 1957 .

[40]  L. Festinger,et al.  Pressures Toward Uniformity of Performance in Groups , 1957 .

[41]  E. Hollander.  Interpersonal Exposure Time as a Determinant of the Predictive Utility of Peer Ratings , 1956 .

[42]  W. Borg,et al.  Comparison between a Performance Test and Criteria of Instructor Effectiveness , 1956 .

[43]  E. Hollander,et al.  The friendship factor in peer nominations. , 1956 .

[44]  G. Mayo.  Peer Ratings and Halo , 1956 .

[45]  G. Suci,et al.  A Study of the Effects of “Likingness” and Level of Objectivity on Peer Rating Reliabilities1 , 1956 .

[46]  Robert R. Blake,et al.  The Validity of Sociometric Responses , 1955 .

[47]  H. Ricciuti.  Ratings of leadership potential at the U. S. Naval Academy and subsequent officer performance. , 1955 .

[48]  W. B. Webb,et al.  Leadership, followership, and friendship: an analysis of peer nominations. , 1955, Journal of abnormal psychology.

[49]  W. B. Webb.  The Problem of Obtaining Negative Nominations in Peer Ratings , 1955 .

[50]  R. R. Blake,et al.  The Reliability of Sociometric Measures , 1955 .

[51]  E. Hollander.  Buddy Ratings: Military Research and Industrial Implications , 1954 .

[52]  J. Rohrer,et al.  An Objective Peer Evaluation Scale: Construction and Validity , 1954 .

[53]  E. Hollander.  Peer nominations on leadership as a predictor of the pass-fail criterion in naval air training. , 1954 .

[54]  R. Wherry,et al.  Buddy Ratings: Popularity , 1949 .

[55]  M. Powell,et al.  Comparisons of Self-Rating, Peer-Ratings, and Expert's-Ratings of Personality Adjustment , 1948, Educational and psychological measurement.

[56]  Stanley B. Williams,et al.  Group opinion as a predictor of military leadership. , 1947, Journal of consulting psychology.

[57]  Michael J. Stahl,et al.  Improving R&D Productivity: Measuring Innovation and Productivity — A Peer Rating Approach , 1977 .

[58]  J. R Hackman,et al.  Improving life at work: Behavioral science approaches to organizational change , 1977 .

[59]  James C. Johnson,et al.  Scaling peer ratings: An examination of the differential validities of positive and negative nominations. , 1974 .

[60]  F. Schmidt,et al.  Effect of race on peer ratings in an industrial situation. , 1973 .

[61]  A. Lewin,et al.  Face-to-face interaction in the peer-nomination process. , 1971 .

[62]  Harry E. Roadman.  An industrial use of peer ratings. , 1964 .

[63]  D. K. Trites.  Adaptability measures as predictors of performance ratings. , 1960 .

[64]  Donald W. Fiske,et al.  The consistency of ratings by peers. , 1960 .

[65]  A. J. Kubany.  Use of sociometric peer nominations in medical education research. , 1957 .

[66]  D. Springer.  Ratings of candidates for promotion by co-workers and supervisors. , 1953 .