Subject searching in online catalogs: metaknowledge used by experienced searchers

This paper begins to identify and characterize the knowledge used by experienced librarians while searching for subject information in online catalogs. Ten experienced librarians performed the same set of six subject searches in an online catalog. Investigated was the knowledge used to solve retrieval problems. This knowledge represents expertise in the use of the catalog. Data were collected through the use of think-aloud protocols, transaction logs, and structured interviews. Knowledge was defined as knowledge of objects (factual knowledge), knowledge of events (experiential knowledge), knowledge of performance (process knowledge), and metaknowledge. Metaknowledge is the sense of whole derived from the integration of factual, process, and experiential knowledge about the search and the conditions under which it is performed. The focus of this paper is on metaknowledge. For evidence of metaknowledge the data were examined for explanations that participants gave for their actions and observations, and for ways that participants evaluated their own progress during the process of searching. Reasons and explanations given by searchers were related to all phases of the library information retrieval process from the user's receipt of material to policies for collection development, and not just events directly related to the performance of a particular search task.

[1]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Information search tactics , 1979, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[2]  Joseph R. Matthews,et al.  Using Online Catalogs: A Nationwide Survey , 1983 .

[3]  T. Kuhn,et al.  The Structure of Scientific Revolutions. , 1964 .

[4]  Howard Harris,et al.  Expert systems : concepts and applications , 1988 .

[5]  J. Matthews,et al.  Using online catalogs : a nationwide survey : a report of a study sponsored by the Council on Library Resources , 1983 .

[6]  Marianne LaFrance,et al.  The quality of expertise: implications of expert-novice differences for knowledge acquisition , 1989, SGAR.

[7]  Tschera Harkness Connell.  Librarian subject searching in online catalogs: An exploratory study of knowledge used , 1991 .

[8]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  Protocol Analysis: Verbal Reports as Data , 1984 .

[9]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  The user's mental model of an information retrieval system , 1999, SIGIR '85.

[10]  Christine L. Borgman,et al.  Why are Online Catalogs Hard to Use? Lessons Learned from Information=Retrieval Studies , 1986 .

[11]  Bob Wielinga,et al.  Use of Models in the Interpretation of Verbal Data , 1987 .

[12]  Penny J. Daniels,et al.  Cognitive Models in Information Retrieval - an Evaluative Review , 1986, J. Documentation.

[13]  Y. Chen.  [The change of serum alpha 1-antitrypsin level in patients with spontaneous pneumothorax]. , 1995, Zhonghua jie he he hu xi za zhi = Zhonghua jiehe he huxi zazhi = Chinese journal of tuberculosis and respiratory diseases.

[14]  Tamas E. Doszkocs.  Natural language processing in information retrieval , 1986 .

[15]  Natalie Schoch King.  Search Characteristics and the Effects of Experience on End Users of PaperChase , 1991 .

[16]  Christine L Borgman.  Performance effects of a user's mental model of an information retrieval system. , 1983 .

[17]  Marcia J. Bates,et al.  Factors affecting subject catalog search success , 1977, J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci..

[18]  Nicholas J. Belkin,et al.  Interaction in information systems : a review of research from document retrieval to knowledge-based systems , 1985 .

[19]  Frederick Hayes-Roth,et al.  Building expert systems , 1983, Advanced book program.

[20]  C. O. Frost.  Subject Searching in an Online Catalog. , 1987 .

[21]  C. R. Hildreth,et al.  Intelligent Interfaces and Retrieval Methods for Subject Searching in Bibliographic Retrieval Systems , 1989 .