The cranial morphometrics of the wildfowl (Anatidae)

Abstract Wildfowl (Anatidae) are a diverse group of birds and globally distributed. These birds feed by widely varying methods, there are generalist and specialist species. In a number of vertebrate taxa trophic specializations have led to distinct differences in the morphology of the skull, like in birds. Our knowledge and understanding of the relationship between cranial morphology and feeding mechanism of wildfowl are limited. The aim of this article is to increase our knowledge of the relationship between skull shape and foraging habits and find the identifiable attributes of the differently adapted groups. We used morphometric methods with 7 linear measurements of the skull. We used principal component (PC) analysis to identify the groups with different foraging habits. The PCs were related to measurements which represent the demanded muscle mass for feeding and the amount of capable food items. The grazers have a narrower bill and bigger bone surface which requires more muscle tissue than the broad billed filter-feeders. We observed the structural and functional differences between grazers and filter-feeders. There are no important differences in the bill measurements between omnivore dabbling and diving ducks. Only the bill is not enough to deduce the foraging habits.

[1]  K. Hobson,et al.  Resource partitioning among five species of waterfowl (Anas spp.) at an autumn migratory stopover: Combining stable isotope and mercury biomarkers. , 2017 .

[2]  T. Stidham,et al.  New data on stiff‐tailed duck evolution and dispersal from a new species of diving duck (Anseriformes: Anatidae: cf. Oxyurinae) from the Miocene High Rock Caldera in north‐west Nevada, USA , 2016 .

[3]  Bo Li,et al.  Complete mitochondrial genome of Tundra swan Cygnus columbianus jankowskii (Anseriformes: Anatidae) , 2016, Mitochondrial DNA. Part A, DNA mapping, sequencing, and analysis.

[4]  G. Hegyi,et al.  Using Full Models, Stepwise Regression and Model Selection in Ecological Data Sets: Monte Carlo Simulations , 2015 .

[5]  G. Baldassarre Ducks, Geese, and Swans of North America , 2014 .

[6]  Elizabeth L Brainerd,et al.  Kinematics of the quadrate bone during feeding in mallard ducks , 2011, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[7]  Carolina Deborah Kurk The bill of evolution : trophic adaptations in anseriform birds , 2008 .

[8]  A. Iwaniuk,et al.  Captive Breeding Reduces Brain Volume in Waterfowl (Anseriformes) , 2008 .

[9]  Charles W. Linkem,et al.  MITOCHONDRIAL INTROGRESSION AND INCOMPLETE LINEAGE SORTING THROUGH SPACE AND TIME: PHYLOGENETICS OF CROTAPHYTID LIZARDS , 2007, Evolution; international journal of organic evolution.

[10]  J. Marugán-Lobón,et al.  Avian skull morphological evolution: exploring exo- and endocranial covariation with two-block partial least squares. , 2006, Zoology.

[11]  A. Herrel,et al.  Bite performance and morphology in a population of Darwin's finches: implications for the evolution of beak shape , 2005 .

[12]  C. T. Stayton Morphological evolution of the lizard skull: A geometric morphometrics survey , 2005, Journal of morphology.

[13]  M. V. D. van der Meij,et al.  Scaling of jaw muscle size and maximal bite force in finches , 2004, Journal of Experimental Biology.

[14]  H. Fritz,et al.  Feeding methods, visual fields and vigilance in dabbling ducks (Anatidae) , 2002 .

[15]  C. Hänni,et al.  A molecular phylogeny of anseriformes based on mitochondrial DNA analysis. , 2002, Molecular phylogenetics and evolution.

[16]  A. Herrel,et al.  The implications of bite performance for diet in two species of lacertid lizards , 2001 .

[17]  I. Gordon,et al.  The functional relationship between feeding type and jaw and cranial morphology in ungulates , 1999, Oecologia.

[18]  B. Livezey A phylogenetic analysis of basal Anseriformes, the fossil Presbyornis, and the interordinal relationships of waterfowl , 1997 .

[19]  J. Chaline,et al.  Quantification of cranial convergences in arvicolids (Rodentia) , 1997 .

[20]  P. Wainwright Ecological Explanation through Functional Morphology: The Feeding Biology of Sunfishes , 1996 .

[21]  A. Herrel,et al.  Prey capture in the lizard Agama stellio , 1995, Journal of morphology.

[22]  H. Berkhoudt,et al.  Filter feeding in Flamingos (Phoenicopterus ruber) , 1995 .

[23]  J. Elmberg,et al.  Species composition of dabbling duck assemblages: ecomorphological patterns compared with null models , 1994, Oecologia.

[24]  K. Kardong,et al.  Vertebrates: Comparative Anatomy, Function, Evolution , 1994 .

[25]  Geoffrey R. Norman,et al.  Biostatistics: The Bare Essentials , 1993 .

[26]  J. Kooloos,et al.  Integration of pecking, filter feeding and drinking mechanisms in waterfowl , 1991, Acta biotheoretica.

[27]  C. D. Ankney,et al.  Interspecific differences in bill and tongue morphology among diving ducks (Aythya spp., Oxyura jamaicensis) , 1989 .

[28]  V. Thomas,et al.  A comparison of interspecific differences in the morphology of external and internal feeding apparatus among North American Anatidae , 1987 .

[29]  B. Livezey Phylogeny and Historical Biogeography of Steamer-Ducks (Anatidae: Tachyeres) , 1986 .

[30]  T. Moermond Mechanistic Approach to the Structure of Animal Communities: Anolis Lizards and Birds , 1986 .

[31]  T. Nudds,et al.  Sexual size dimorphism in relation to resource partitioning in North American dabbling ducks , 1984 .

[32]  T. Nudds,et al.  Predator-prey size relationships in North American dabbling ducks , 1984 .

[33]  G. Gauthier,et al.  Comparison of daily energy expenditure of greater snow geese between two habitats , 1984 .

[34]  E. Werner 21. The Mechanisms of Species Interactions and Community Organization in Fish , 1984 .

[35]  H. Pöysä Morphology mediated niche organization in a guild of dabbling ducks , 1983 .

[36]  H. Pöysä Resource Utilization Pattern and Guild Structure in a Waterfowl Community , 1983 .

[37]  C. Perrins,et al.  Birds of the Western Palearctic , 1978, Nature.

[38]  H. I. Fisher,et al.  Feeding Adaptations in the Waterfowl@@@Functional Anatomy of the Feeding Apparatus in Waterfowl. , 1964 .

[39]  Walter J. Bock,et al.  Kinetics of the avian skull , 1964 .

[40]  R. Selander,et al.  Feeding Adaptations in Darwin's Finches@@@Morphological Differentiation and Adaptation in the Galapagos Finches , 1962 .

[41]  P. Johnsgard The World’s Waterfowl in the 21st Century: A 2010 Supplement to Ducks, Geese, and Swans of the World , 2010 .

[42]  G. Langenbach,et al.  Comparative mechanics of filter feeding in Anas platyrhynchos, Anas clypeata and Aythya fuligula (Aves, Anseriformes) , 2004, Zoomorphology.

[43]  A. Herrel,et al.  Evolutionary relationships between cranial shape and diet in bats (Mammalia: Chiroptera) , 2002 .

[44]  K. Metzger Cranial Kinesis in Lepidosaurs : Skulls in Motion , 2002 .

[45]  P. Nummi,et al.  High overlap in diets of sympatric dabbling ducks — an effect of food abundance? , 2001 .

[46]  N. N. Iordansky Evolution of Cranial Kinesis in Lower Tetrapods , 1989 .

[47]  R. Zusi A functional and evolutionary analysis of Rhynchokinesis in birds , 1984 .

[48]  P. Johnsgard Ducks, Geese, And Swans Of The World , 1978 .

[49]  J. Harrison A comparative study of the method of skull Pneumatisation in certain birds (Part 2) , 1961 .

[50]  H. I. Fisher,et al.  Functional Anatomy of the Feeding Apparatus in Waterfowl (Aves: Anatidae) , 1954 .