Adaptive Kalman filter-based information fusion in electrical impedance tomography for a two-phase flow

Abstract Electrical impedance tomography (EIT) is a severely ill-posed nonlinear inverse problem. In order to obtain solutions with physical meaning, the inverse of the model of measurements requires the combination of information from various sources. This paper proposes a new approach through Kalman filtering for adaptive integration of EIT measurements, Tikhonov regularization and evolution models for the characterization of a two-phase air–water fluid flow. The Tikhonov regularization factor is embedded into the observation error covariance matrix, thus allowing for individual adjustment for each of the regularization equations. The filter outputs for different evolution models—random walk, advective and advective–diffusive—are compared in terms of estimate convergence and physical meaning. With the random walk evolution model the analysis of experimental data shows that the proposed information fusion strategy provides fewer artifacts, enabling a more effective identification of the phase interfaces. When the other two evolution models are incorporated into the Kalman filter and compared with the random walk model, faster and more accurate estimates of the flow are obtained even away from the electrodes, as well as sharper phase interfaces are identified. The results suggest that the reason for this improved performance is the fused information from the upstream–downstream dynamics of the advective and advective–diffusive models with the outer-inner structure influence of measurements.

[1]  Vladik Kreinovich,et al.  Uncertain information fusion and knowledge integration: How to take reliability into account , 2017, 2017 Joint 17th World Congress of International Fuzzy Systems Association and 9th International Conference on Soft Computing and Intelligent Systems (IFSA-SCIS).

[2]  S J Hamilton,et al.  Robust computation in 2D absolute EIT (a-EIT) using D-bar methods with the ‘exp’ approximation , 2017, Physiological measurement.

[3]  Simon J. Julier,et al.  Weak in the NEES?: Auto-Tuning Kalman Filters with Bayesian Optimization , 2018, 2018 21st International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION).

[4]  P.A. Karjalainen,et al.  A Kalman filter approach to track fast impedance changes in electrical impedance tomography , 1998, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[5]  Ka-Veng Yuen,et al.  Online estimation of noise parameters for Kalman filter , 2013 .

[6]  Michael L. Corradini,et al.  Wire-mesh sensors: A review of methods and uncertainty in multiphase flows relative to other measurement techniques , 2018, Nuclear Engineering and Design.

[7]  Emre Kiyak,et al.  Optimizing a Kalman filter with an evolutionary algorithm for nonlinear quadrotor attitude dynamics , 2020, J. Comput. Sci..

[8]  Robert S. Brodkey,et al.  Transport Phenomena: A Unified Approach , 2003 .

[9]  E. Somersalo,et al.  State estimation with fluid dynamical evolution models in process tomography - an application to impedance tomography , 2001 .

[10]  Jari P. Kaipio,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography imaging with reduced-order model based on proper orthogonal decomposition , 2013, J. Electronic Imaging.

[11]  Umer Zeeshan Ijaz,et al.  Electrical resistance imaging of a time-varying interface in stratified flows using an unscented Kalman filter , 2008 .

[12]  Jari P. Kaipio,et al.  Nonstationary approximation error approach to imaging of three-dimensional pipe flow: experimental evaluation , 2011 .

[13]  Helio Koiti Kuga,et al.  Kalman filtering state noise adaptive estimation , 1983 .

[14]  Andreas Dedner,et al.  A Fast Parallel Solver for the Forward Problem in Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2015, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[15]  Tadakuni Murai,et al.  Electrical Impedance Computed Tomography Based on a Finite Element Model , 1985, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[16]  M. Soleimani,et al.  Reducing computational costs in large scale 3D EIT by using a sparse Jacobian matrix with block-wise CGLS reconstruction , 2013, Physiological measurement.

[17]  B. Brown,et al.  Applied potential tomography. , 1989, Journal of the British Interplanetary Society.

[18]  C. Papadimitriou,et al.  A dual Kalman filter approach for state estimation via output-only acceleration measurements , 2015 .

[19]  Fakhri Karray,et al.  Multisensor data fusion: A review of the state-of-the-art , 2013, Inf. Fusion.

[20]  Kai Sun,et al.  A Statistical Shape-Constrained Reconstruction Framework for Electrical Impedance Tomography , 2019, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.

[21]  E. Somersalo,et al.  Nonstationary inverse problems and state estimation , 1999 .

[22]  Kil-To Chong,et al.  Experiments on State and Unmeasured-Parameter Estimation of Two Degree-of-Freedom System for Precise Control Based on JAUKF , 2019 .

[23]  D. Simon Optimal State Estimation: Kalman, H Infinity, and Nonlinear Approaches , 2006 .

[24]  Renato Seiji Tavares,et al.  Influence of current injection pattern and electric potential measurement strategies in electrical impedance tomography , 2017 .

[25]  D. Isaacson,et al.  Electrode models for electric current computed tomography , 1989, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[26]  Arto Voutilainen,et al.  State estimation in process tomography—Three‐dimensional impedance imaging of moving fluids , 2008 .

[27]  Gunther Uhlmann,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography and Calderón's problem , 2009 .

[28]  José Jaime Da Cruz,et al.  Complete offline tuning of the unscented Kalman filter , 2017, Autom..

[29]  Samuli Siltanen,et al.  Linear and Nonlinear Inverse Problems with Practical Applications , 2012, Computational science and engineering.

[30]  Jari P. Kaipio,et al.  An experimental evaluation of state estimation with fluid dynamical models in process tomography , 2007 .

[31]  Umer Zeeshan Ijaz,et al.  Nonstationary phase boundary estimation in electrical impedance tomography based on the interacting multiple model scheme , 2007 .

[32]  A. Jazwinski Stochastic Processes and Filtering Theory , 1970 .

[33]  Arto Voutilainen,et al.  State estimation in process tomography—reconstruction of velocity fields using EIT , 2009 .

[34]  Raul Gonzalez Lima,et al.  Solving the electrical impedance tomography inverse problem for logarithmic conductivity: Numerical sensitivity , 2018 .

[35]  Raul Gonzalez Lima,et al.  Electrical impedance tomography using the extended Kalman filter , 2004, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.

[36]  Rodrigo Cornejo,et al.  Lung monitoring with electrical impedance tomography: technical considerations and clinical applications. , 2019, Journal of thoracic disease.