RECEPTOR INTERACTIONS OF IMIDAZOLINES: α‐ADRENOCEPTORS OF RAT AND RABBIT AORTAE DIFFERENTIATED BY RELATIVE POTENCIES, AFFINITIES AND EFFICACIES OF IMIDAZOLINE AGONISTS

1 Noradrenaline and a series of imidazolines were used to characterize and differentiate the postsynaptic α‐adrenoceptors of rat and rabbit aortae. 2 Dose‐response curves in each tissue revealed marked differences in the profile of agonist activity among the compounds. Based on the ED50 values for each compound, a rank order of potency of oxymetazoline > noradrenaline > tramazoline > tetrahydrozoline > clonidine was obtained in rabbit aorta and an order of noradrenaline > clonidine > tramazoline > oxymetazoline was obtained in rat aorta. Tetrahydrozoline had no agonist activity in rat aorta. 3 Dissociation constants were determined for each agonist in rat and rabbit aortae. Again, differences between the tissues were observed to the extent that the rank order of affinities for the imidazolines were exactly opposite for the two tissues. In rabbit aorta the order was, oxymetazoline > tramazoline > tetrahydrozoline > clonidine, whereas in rat aorta it was, clonidine > tetrahydrozoline > tramazoline > oxymetazoline. The extremes in tissue selectivity were observed with clonidine, which had approximately 125 fold higher affinity in rat aorta, and oxymetazoline, which had approximately 4 times higher affinity in rabbit aorta. 4 The absolute values of relative efficacies of the imidazolines studied, and their rank order, also differed between the two tissues. The relative efficacies of oxymetazoline and tramazoline were more than 15 fold greater in rabbit aorta than in rat aorta. Furthermore, tetrahydrozoline had a greater relative efficacy than clonidine in rabbit aorta while the converse was true in rat aorta. 5 Differences in the rank order of potency, affinity and relative efficacy of noradrenaline and a series of imidazolines in rat and rabbit aortae indicate that the postsynaptic α‐adrenoceptors in these tissues are different. While the postsynaptic α‐adrenoceptor of rabbit aorta is clearly of the α1‐subtype, the exact nature of the postsynaptic α‐receptor of rat aorta is not clear. The unique α‐receptor of rat aorta has properties of both α1‐ and α2‐adrenoceptors.

[1]  R. Ruffolo,et al.  Heterogeneity of postsynaptic Alpha adrenergic receptors in mammalian aortas. , 1982, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[2]  J. McGrath.  Evidence for more than one type of post-junctional α-Adrenoceptor , 1982 .

[3]  J. Stoclet,et al.  Functional characterization of postjunctional α-adrenoceptors in rat aorta , 1981 .

[4]  R. Ruffolo,et al.  Receptor interactions of imidazolines. VII. Peripherally mediated pressor and centrally mediated depressor effects of clonidine and a series of mono- and dimethoxy-substituted tolazoline derivatives. , 1981, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[5]  P. Vanhoutte,et al.  Uneven Distribution of Postjunctional Alphai‐ and Alpha2‐like Adrenoceptors in Canine Arterial and Venous Smooth Muscle , 1981, Circulation research.

[6]  R. Ruffolo,et al.  Postsynaptic alpha adrenergic receptor subtypes differentiated by yohimbine in tissues from the rat. Existence of alpha-2 adrenergic receptors in rat aorta. , 1981, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[7]  R. Ruffolo,et al.  Receptor interactrions of imidazolines. VI. Significance of carbon bridge separating phenyl and imidazoline rings of tolazoline-like alpha adrenergic imidazolines. , 1980, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[8]  R. Ruffolo,et al.  Computerized graphic methods for determining dissociation constants of agonists, partial agonists, and competitive antagonists in isolated smooth muscle preparations. , 1980, Journal of pharmacological methods.

[9]  R. Ruffolo,et al.  Receptor interactions of imidazolines. V. clonidine differentiates postsynaptic alpha adrenergic receptor subtypes in tissues from the rat. , 1980, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[10]  R. Ruffolo,et al.  Receptor interactions of imidazolines. IV. Structural requirements for alpha adrenergic receptor occupation and receptor activation by clonidine and a series of structural analogs in rat aorta. , 1980, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[11]  K. Starke,et al.  Recent Developments in α-Adrenoceptor Research , 1980 .

[12]  R. Ruffolo,et al.  Receptor interactions of imidazolines. III. Structure-activity relationships governing alpha adrenergic receptor occupation and receptor activation for mono- and dimethoxy-substituted tolazoline derivatives in rat aorta. , 1979, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[13]  R. Ruffolo,et al.  Receptor interactions of imidazolines. II. Affinities and efficacies of hydroxy-substituted tolazoline derivatives in rat aorta. , 1979, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[14]  R. Ruffolo,et al.  Receptor interactions of imidazolines. I. Affinity and efficacy for alpha adrenergic receptors in rat aorta. , 1979, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[15]  G. M. Drew.  PHARMACOLOGICAL CHARACTERIZATION OF THE PRESYNAPTIC α‐ADRENOCEPTORS REGULATING CHOLINERGIC ACTIVITY IN THE GUINEA‐PIG ILEUM , 1978, British journal of pharmacology.

[16]  I. Hughes,et al.  Possible differences in α‐adrenoceptors in rabbit ileum and spleen , 1978 .

[17]  D. Paton,et al.  Effect of time and initial concentration of agonist on contractile responses in rat aorta , 1978 .

[18]  J. Wikberg.  Pharmacological classification of adrenergic α receptors in the guinea pig , 1978, Nature.

[19]  I. Hughes,et al.  Possible subdivisions among α‐adrenoceptors in various isolated tissues , 1977 .

[20]  R. Furchgott,et al.  Dissociation constants and relative efficacies of agonists acting on alpha adrenergic receptors in rabbit aorta. , 1976, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[21]  D. Miller,et al.  Alpha adrenergic and histaminergic effects of tolazoline-like imidazolines. , 1975, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[22]  R. D. Green,et al.  A quantitative study of alpha adrenergic receptors in the spleen and aorta of the rabbit. , 1972, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[23]  R. Furchgott.  The Classification of Adrenoceptors (Adrenergic Receptors). An Evaluation from the Standpoint of Receptor Theory , 1972 .

[24]  D. Waud.  On the measurement of the affinity of partial agonists for receptors. , 1969, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[25]  C. M. Woolf.  Principles of biometry : statistics for biologists , 1968 .

[26]  R. Furchgott,et al.  COMPARISON OF DISSOCIATION CONSTANTS AND OF RELATIVE EFFICACIES OF SELECTED AGONISTS ACTING ON PARASYMPATHETIC RECEPTORS * , 1967 .

[27]  R. Ahlquist,et al.  The adrenergic receptor. , 1966, Journal of pharmaceutical sciences.

[28]  R. Furchgott,et al.  ACTIONS AND INTERACTIONS OF NOREPINEPHRINE, TYRAMINE AND COCAINE ON AORTIC STRIPS OF RABBIT AND LEFT ATRIA OF GUINEA PIG AND CAT. , 1963, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[29]  Van Rossum Jm.  Cumulative dose-response curves. II. Technique for the making of dose-response curves in isolated organs and the evaluation of drug parameters. , 1963 .

[30]  J. V. van Rossum.  Cumulative dose-response curves. II. Technique for the making of dose-response curves in isolated organs and the evaluation of drug parameters. , 1963, Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie.

[31]  H. Schild,et al.  SOME QUANTITATIVE USES OF DRUG ANTAGONISTS , 1997, British journal of pharmacology and chemotherapy.

[32]  R P STEPHENSON,et al.  A MODIFICATION OF RECEPTOR THEORY , 1997, British journal of pharmacology and chemotherapy.

[33]  Ariens Ej,et al.  Affinity and intrinsic activity in the theory of competitive inhibition. I. Problems and theory. , 1954 .

[34]  E. Ariens.  Affinity and intrinsic activity in the theory of competitive inhibition. I. Problems and theory. , 1954, Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie.

[35]  A. Simonis,et al.  Affinity and intrinsic-activity in the theory of competitive inhibition. II. Experiments with paraamino-benzoic acid derivatives. , 1954, Archives internationales de pharmacodynamie et de therapie.

[36]  R. Furchgott,et al.  Reactions of strips of rabbit aorta to epinephrine, isopropylarterenol, sodium nitrite and other drugs. , 1953, The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics.

[37]  H. Schild.  The use of drug antagonists for the identification and classification of drugs. , 1947, British journal of pharmacology and chemotherapy.