Ocrelizumab versus Interferon Beta‐1a in Relapsing Multiple Sclerosis

BACKGROUND B cells influence the pathogenesis of multiple sclerosis. Ocrelizumab is a humanized monoclonal antibody that selectively depletes CD20+ B cells. METHODS In two identical phase 3 trials, we randomly assigned 821 and 835 patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis to receive intravenous ocrelizumab at a dose of 600 mg every 24 weeks or subcutaneous interferon beta‐1a at a dose of 44 μg three times weekly for 96 weeks. The primary end point was the annualized relapse rate. RESULTS The annualized relapse rate was lower with ocrelizumab than with interferon beta‐1a in trial 1 (0.16 vs. 0.29; 46% lower rate with ocrelizumab; P<0.001) and in trial 2 (0.16 vs. 0.29; 47% lower rate; P<0.001). In prespecified pooled analyses, the percentage of patients with disability progression confirmed at 12 weeks was significantly lower with ocrelizumab than with interferon beta‐1a (9.1% vs. 13.6%; hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.45 to 0.81; P<0.001), as was the percentage of patients with disability progression confirmed at 24 weeks (6.9% vs. 10.5%; hazard ratio, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.43 to 0.84; P=0.003). The mean number of gadolinium‐enhancing lesions per T1‐weighted magnetic resonance scan was 0.02 with ocrelizumab versus 0.29 with interferon beta‐1a in trial 1 (94% lower number of lesions with ocrelizumab, P<0.001) and 0.02 versus 0.42 in trial 2 (95% lower number of lesions, P<0.001). The change in the Multiple Sclerosis Functional Composite score (a composite measure of walking speed, upper‐limb movements, and cognition; for this z score, negative values indicate worsening and positive values indicate improvement) significantly favored ocrelizumab over interferon beta‐1a in trial 2 (0.28 vs. 0.17, P=0.004) but not in trial 1 (0.21 vs. 0.17, P=0.33). Infusion‐related reactions occurred in 34.3% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab. Serious infection occurred in 1.3% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab and in 2.9% of those treated with interferon beta‐1a. Neoplasms occurred in 0.5% of the patients treated with ocrelizumab and in 0.2% of those treated with interferon beta‐1a. CONCLUSIONS Among patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis, ocrelizumab was associated with lower rates of disease activity and progression than interferon beta‐1a over a period of 96 weeks. Larger and longer studies of the safety of ocrelizumab are required. (Funded by F. Hoffmann–La Roche; OPERA I and II ClinicalTrials.gov numbers, NCT01247324 and NCT01412333, respectively.)

[1]  Bernhard Hemmer,et al.  Ocrelizumab versus Placebo in Primary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis , 2017, The New England journal of medicine.

[2]  Alyssa H. Zhu,et al.  Long‐term evolution of multiple sclerosis disability in the treatment era , 2016, Annals of neurology.

[3]  H. Hartung,et al.  Disease-modifying therapies and infectious risks in multiple sclerosis , 2016, Nature Reviews Neurology.

[4]  P. Sørensen,et al.  The potential role for ocrelizumab in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: current evidence and future prospects , 2016, Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders.

[5]  A. Bar-Or,et al.  Proinflammatory GM-CSF–producing B cells in multiple sclerosis and B cell depletion therapy , 2015, Science Translational Medicine.

[6]  D. Margolin,et al.  Prevention and Management of Infusion-Associated Reactions in the Comparison of Alemtuzumab and Rebif(®) Efficacy in Multiple Sclerosis (CARE-MS) Program. , 2015, International journal of MS care.

[7]  H. Weiner,et al.  Evaluation of no evidence of disease activity in a 7-year longitudinal multiple sclerosis cohort. , 2015, JAMA neurology.

[8]  S. Hauser The Charcot Lecture | Beating MS: A story of B cells, with twists and turns , 2015, Multiple sclerosis.

[9]  M. Sirota,et al.  Immunoglobulin class-switched B cells form an active immune axis between CNS and periphery in multiple sclerosis , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[10]  Steven H. Kleinstein,et al.  B cells populating the multiple sclerosis brain mature in the draining cervical lymph nodes , 2014, Science Translational Medicine.

[11]  S. Hauser,et al.  Multiple sclerosis: Prospects and promise , 2013, Annals of neurology.

[12]  C. Klein,et al.  Response to: Monoclonal antibodies targeting CD20 , 2013, mAbs.

[13]  Martin S. Weber,et al.  Targeting B cells in the treatment of multiple sclerosis: recent advances and remaining challenges , 2013, Therapeutic advances in neurological disorders.

[14]  C. Klein,et al.  Epitope interactions of monoclonal antibodies targeting CD20 and their relationship to functional properties , 2013, mAbs.

[15]  T. Ineke,et al.  A single dose of rituximab does not deplete B cells in secondary lymphoid organs, but alters phenotype and function , 2013 .

[16]  D. Cox,et al.  B cell exchange across the blood-brain barrier in multiple sclerosis. , 2012, The Journal of clinical investigation.

[17]  Jeffrey A. Cohen,et al.  Alemtuzumab for patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis after disease-modifying therapy: a randomised controlled phase 3 trial , 2012, The Lancet.

[18]  F. Zhu,et al.  Cancer risk in multiple sclerosis: findings from British Columbia, Canada. , 2012, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[19]  Anthony Traboulsee,et al.  Relationship between early clinical characteristics and long term disability outcomes: 16 year cohort study (follow-up) of the pivotal interferon β-1b trial in multiple sclerosis , 2011, Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry.

[20]  F. Barkhof,et al.  Ocrelizumab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: a phase 2, randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre trial , 2011, The Lancet.

[21]  R. Reynolds,et al.  Meningeal inflammation is widespread and linked to cortical pathology in multiple sclerosis. , 2011, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[22]  Jeffrey A. Cohen,et al.  Diagnostic criteria for multiple sclerosis: 2010 Revisions to the McDonald criteria , 2011, Annals of neurology.

[23]  Ludwig Kappos,et al.  Natalizumab treatment for multiple sclerosis: updated recommendations for patient selection and monitoring , 2007, The Lancet Neurology.

[24]  M. Genovese,et al.  Ocrelizumab, a humanized anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, in the treatment of patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a phase I/II randomized, blinded, placebo-controlled, dose-ranging study. , 2008, Arthritis and rheumatism.

[25]  D. Arnold,et al.  B-cell depletion with rituximab in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. , 2008, The New England journal of medicine.

[26]  A. Bar-Or,et al.  The Immunology of Multiple Sclerosis , 2008, Seminars in neurology.

[27]  Thomas F. Tedder,et al.  Maintenance of Long-Lived Plasma Cells and Serological Memory Despite Mature and Memory B Cell Depletion during CD20 Immunotherapy in Mice1 , 2008, The Journal of Immunology.

[28]  A. al‐Sabbagh,et al.  Neutralizing antibodies in MS therapy: reviewing the Rebif experience , 2007 .

[29]  M. Trojano,et al.  New natural history of interferon‐β–treated relapsing multiple sclerosis , 2007 .

[30]  M. Trojano,et al.  New natural history of interferon-beta-treated relapsing multiple sclerosis. , 2007, Annals of neurology.

[31]  A. Chan,et al.  B cell immunobiology in disease: evolving concepts from the clinic. , 2006, Annual review of immunology.

[32]  H. Storm,et al.  Cancer risk among patients with multiple sclerosis: A population‐based register study , 2006, International journal of cancer.

[33]  Wolfgang Brück,et al.  The pathology of multiple sclerosis is the result of focal inflammatory demyelination with axonal damage , 2005, Journal of Neurology.

[34]  B. Serafini,et al.  Detection of Ectopic B‐cell Follicles with Germinal Centers in the Meninges of Patients with Secondary Progressive Multiple Sclerosis , 2004, Brain pathology.

[35]  Stephen M. Smith,et al.  Accurate, Robust, and Automated Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Brain Change Analysis , 2002, NeuroImage.

[36]  J. Fischer,et al.  Use of the multiple sclerosis functional composite as an outcome measure in a phase 3 clinical trial. , 2001, Archives of neurology.

[37]  ICH harmonized tripartite guideline: Guideline for Good Clinical Practice. , 2001, Journal of postgraduate medicine.

[38]  S. Hauser,et al.  Identification of autoantibodies associated with myelin damage in multiple sclerosis , 1999, Nature Medicine.

[39]  H. Lassmann,et al.  Multiple sclerosis: In situ evidence for antibody‐ and complement‐mediated demyelination , 1998, Annals of neurology.

[40]  J. Kurtzke Rating neurologic impairment in multiple sclerosis , 1983, Neurology.