The Relationship between Coercion and Protest

The relationship between coercion and protest, arguably the core of any theory of rebellion, remains unresolved. Competing hypotheses have emerged from formal models and empirical research. This article uses two forms of the predator-prey model to test these competing hypotheses. Time-series data from three coercive states (the German Democratic Republic, Czechoslovakia, and the Palestinian Intifada) are used to estimate parameters for both models. Results show stable, damped relationships in all three cases. The “inverted U” hypothesis receives less support than its “backlash” alternative, that is, that dissidents react strongly to extremely harsh coercion. Moreover, the study indicates that protesters adapt to coercion by changing tactics.

[1]  E. Muller,et al.  Theories of Rebellion , 1994 .

[2]  C. Brockett Measuring Political Violence and Land Inequality in Central America , 1992, American Political Science Review.

[3]  C. Taylor,et al.  World handbook of political and social indicators , 1972 .

[4]  Ronald A. Francisco Coercion and Protest: An Empirical Test in Two Democratic States , 1996 .

[5]  K. Opp Repression and Revolutionary Action , 1994 .

[6]  Meron Benvenisti,et al.  The West Bank And Gaza Atlas , 1990 .

[7]  T. Gurr,et al.  Why Men Rebel. , 1970 .

[8]  A. Mahajan,et al.  A Dynamic Model of Domestic Political Conflict Process , 1990 .

[9]  Harry Eckstein Internal War: Problems and Approaches , 1980 .

[10]  John Vandermeer,et al.  Elementary Mathematical Ecology , 1982 .

[11]  T. David Mason,et al.  The Political Economy of Death Squads: Toward a Theory of the Impact of State-Sanctioned Terror , 1989 .

[12]  R. P. Canale An analysis of models describing predator‐prey interaction , 1970 .

[13]  C. Tilly From mobilization to revolution , 1978 .

[14]  Roger Heacock,et al.  Intifada: Palestine at the Crossroads , 1990 .

[15]  M. Lichbach,et al.  Deterrence or Escalation? , 1987 .

[16]  H. Theil Introduction to econometrics , 1978 .

[17]  Ronald A. Francisco Theories of Protest and the Revolutions of 1989 , 1993 .

[18]  David Kowalewski,et al.  Dynamic Models of Dissent and Repression , 1992 .

[19]  Mark S. Granovetter,et al.  Threshold models of diffusion and collective behavior , 1983 .

[20]  Karl-Dieter Opp,et al.  Die volkseigene Revolution , 1993 .

[21]  D. J. Gerner,et al.  One Land, Two Peoples: The Conflict Over Palestine , 1990 .

[22]  George Tsebelis,et al.  Coercion and revolution: Variations on a predator-prey model , 1989 .

[23]  A. Goldberger A course in econometrics , 1991 .

[24]  S. Goldberg,et al.  Introduction to Difference Equations , 1958 .

[25]  M. Seligson,et al.  Inequality and Insurgency , 1987, American Political Science Review.

[26]  M. Lichbach,et al.  Nobody cites nobody else: Mathematical models of domestic political conflict , 1992 .

[27]  D. Hibbs,et al.  Mass Political Violence: A Cross-National Causal Analysis , 1995 .

[28]  Erich Weede,et al.  Cross-National Variation in Political Violence , 1990 .

[29]  R. May,et al.  Stability and Complexity in Model Ecosystems , 1976, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[30]  B. Russett,et al.  Conflict and Coercion in Dependent States , 1978 .

[31]  Mark S. Granovetter Threshold Models of Collective Behavior , 1978, American Journal of Sociology.

[32]  Marwan Khawaja,et al.  Repression and popular collective action: Evidence from the West Bank , 1993 .

[33]  M. Lichbach Rethinking Rationality and Rebellion , 1994 .