Training to Improve Precision and Accuracy in the Measurement of Fiber Morphology

An estimated $7.1 billion dollars a year is spent due to irreproducibility in pre-clinical data from errors in data analysis and reporting. Therefore, developing tools to improve measurement comparability is paramount. Recently, an open source tool, DiameterJ, has been deployed for the automated analysis of scanning electron micrographs of fibrous scaffolds designed for tissue engineering applications. DiameterJ performs hundreds to thousands of scaffold fiber diameter measurements from a single micrograph within a few seconds, along with a variety of other scaffold morphological features, which enables a more rigorous and thorough assessment of scaffold properties. Herein, an online, publicly available training module is introduced for educating DiameterJ users on how to effectively analyze scanning electron micrographs of fibers and the large volume of data that a DiameterJ analysis yields. The end goal of this training was to improve user data analysis and reporting to enhance reproducibility of analysis of nanofiber scaffolds. User performance was assessed before and after training to evaluate the effectiveness of the training modules. Users were asked to use DiameterJ to analyze reference micrographs of fibers that had known diameters. The results showed that training improved the accuracy and precision of measurements of fiber diameter in scanning electron micrographs. Training also improved the precision of measurements of pore area, porosity, intersection density, and characteristic fiber length between fiber intersections. These results demonstrate that the DiameterJ training module improves precision and accuracy in fiber morphology measurements, which will lead to enhanced data comparability.

[1]  C. Begley,et al.  Drug development: Raise standards for preclinical cancer research , 2012, Nature.

[2]  Kapil Bharti,et al.  DiameterJ: A validated open source nanofiber diameter measurement tool. , 2015, Biomaterials.

[3]  Hui-Hua Li,et al.  Interleukin-12p35 Deletion Promotes CD4 T-Cell–Dependent Macrophage Differentiation and Enhances Angiotensin II–Induced Cardiac Fibrosis , 2012, Arteriosclerosis, Thrombosis and Vascular Biology.

[4]  Nick Tucker,et al.  A comparison of automated and manual techniques for measurement of electrospun fibre diameter , 2014 .

[5]  Brian A. Nosek,et al.  An open investigation of the reproducibility of cancer biology research , 2014, eLife.

[6]  Meredith Wadman,et al.  NIH mulls rules for validating key results , 2013, Nature.

[7]  Sumona Sarkar,et al.  Strategies for Achieving Measurement Assurance for Cell Therapy Products , 2016, Stem cells translational medicine.

[8]  Kevin W Eliceiri,et al.  NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[9]  David J. Williams,et al.  Enabling Consistency in Pluripotent Stem Cell‐Derived Products for Research and Development and Clinical Applications Through Material Standards , 2015, Stem cells translational medicine.

[10]  S. Buck,et al.  Solving reproducibility , 2015, Science.

[11]  Ian M. Watt,et al.  The Principles and Practice of Electron Microscopy , 1985 .

[12]  F. Prinz,et al.  Believe it or not: how much can we rely on published data on potential drug targets? , 2011, Nature Reviews Drug Discovery.

[13]  H. Yakowitz,et al.  Practical scanning electron microscopy : electron and ion microprobe analysis , 1975 .

[14]  Johannes E. Schindelin,et al.  Fiji: an open-source platform for biological-image analysis , 2012, Nature Methods.

[15]  JizhongCheng,et al.  Interleukin-12p35 Deletion Promotes CD4 T-Cell–Dependent Macrophage Differentiation and Enhances Angiotensin II–Induced Cardiac Fibrosis , 2012 .

[16]  M. Hussain,et al.  Continuing differentiation of human mesenchymal stem cells and induced chondrogenic and osteogenic lineages in electrospun PLGA nanofiber scaffold. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[17]  Kapil Bharti,et al.  Dataset for the validation and use of DiameterJ an open source nanofiber diameter measurement tool , 2015, Data in brief.

[18]  M. Chan-Park,et al.  Esophageal epithelium regeneration on fibronectin grafted poly(L-lactide-co-caprolactone) (PLLC) nanofiber scaffold. , 2007, Biomaterials.

[19]  Krista L. Niece,et al.  Selective Differentiation of Neural Progenitor Cells by High-Epitope Density Nanofibers , 2004, Science.

[20]  Jocelyn Kaiser,et al.  The cancer test. , 2015, Science.

[21]  F. Collins,et al.  Policy: NIH plans to enhance reproducibility , 2014, Nature.

[22]  K. Heffels,et al.  The role of substrate morphology for the cytokine release profile of immature human primary macrophages. , 2013, Materials science & engineering. C, Materials for biological applications.

[23]  O. Karnieli,et al.  Critical elements in the development of cell therapy potency assays for ischemic conditions. , 2015, Cytotherapy.

[24]  Sook Hee Ku,et al.  Human endothelial cell growth on mussel-inspired nanofiber scaffold for vascular tissue engineering. , 2010, Biomaterials.

[25]  Michael C. Frank,et al.  Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science , 2015, Science.

[26]  Young-Mi Kang,et al.  Nanofiber alignment and direction of mechanical strain affect the ECM production of human ACL fibroblast. , 2005, Biomaterials.

[27]  A. Akbarzadeh,et al.  An update on clinical applications of electrospun nanofibers for skin bioengineering , 2016, Artificial cells, nanomedicine, and biotechnology.

[28]  L. Hutchinson,et al.  High drug attrition rates—where are we going wrong? , 2011, Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

[29]  Jonah Lehrer The Truth Wears Off , 2011 .