Interocular Differences in Higher-Order Aberrations on Binocular Visual Performance

Purpose. To analyze the influence of higher-order aberrations on binocular visual performance under mesopic conditions. Methods. We measured aberrations in both eyes of 35 emmetropic observers with a Wasca aberrometer. Binocular visual performance was checked with both binocular summation for contrast sensitivity function and a parameter that characterizes stereopsis (maximum disparity). Results. Binocular summation and maximum disparity significantly decrease with increasing interocular differences in higher-order aberrations (total, coma, and spherical aberration). Conclusions. At least some aspects of binocular visual performance are less effective for large interocular differences in higher-order eye aberrations.

[1]  P. M. Prieto,et al.  Effects of interactions among wave aberrations on optical image quality , 2006, Vision Research.

[2]  Makoto Oki,et al.  Colorful patterns reveal the structures in fluids , 2003, J. Vis..

[3]  Larry N Thibos,et al.  Metrics of Retinal Image Quality Predict Visual Performance in Eyes With 20/17 or Better Visual Acuity , 2006, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[4]  Wilson S. Geisler,et al.  Color as a source of information in the stereo correspondence process , 1990, Vision Research.

[5]  Marco Lombardo,et al.  Interocular high-order corneal wavefront aberration symmetry. , 2006, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[6]  E. Hita,et al.  Changes in Stereoscopic Depth Perception Caused by Decentration of Spectacle Lenses , 2000, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[7]  R. Hess,et al.  D max for stereopsis depends on size, not spatial frequency content , 1995, Vision Research.

[8]  R. Navarro,et al.  Monochromatic modulation transfer function of the human eye for different pupil diameters: an analytical expression. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[9]  S. Pardhan A comparison of binocular summation in the peripheral visual field in young and older patients. , 1997, Current eye research.

[10]  P. Artal,et al.  The human eye is an example of robust optical design. , 2006, Journal of vision.

[11]  D. Williams,et al.  Monochromatic aberrations of the human eye in a large population. , 2001, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[12]  J R Jiménez,et al.  Associated Phoria in Relation to Stereopsis with Random-Dot Stereograms , 2000, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[13]  D. G. Green,et al.  Monocular versus Binocular Visual Acuity , 1965, Nature.

[14]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Binocular contrast summation—I. Detection and discrimination , 1984, Vision Research.

[15]  Ramón Gutiérrez,et al.  Binocular visual performance after LASIK. , 2005, Journal of refractive surgery.

[16]  Shahina Pardhan,et al.  The effect of monocular defocus on binocular contrast sensitivity , 1990, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[17]  Junzhong Liang,et al.  Aberrations and retinal image quality of the normal human eye. , 1997, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[18]  J. Jiménez,et al.  Induced Aniseikonia Diminishes Binocular Contrast Sensitivity and Binocular Summation , 2004, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[19]  L. Carretero,et al.  Retinal image quality in myopic subjects after refractive surgery , 2000 .

[20]  Enrique Hita,et al.  Optimization of color reproduction on CRT-color monitors , 1999 .

[21]  Li Wang,et al.  Ocular higher‐order aberrations in individuals screened for refractive surgery , 2003, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[22]  Technical Note: Comparison of the wavefront aberrations between natural and pharmacological pupil dilations , 2007, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[23]  I C Wood,et al.  STEREOPSIS WITH SPATIALLY‐DEGRADED IMAGES * , 1983, Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians.

[24]  R. Reading Binocular vision : foundations and applications , 1983 .

[25]  H. Smallman,et al.  Size-disparity correlation in stereopsis at contrast threshold. , 1994, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[26]  Eli Peli,et al.  Stereoacuity at Distance and Near , 2002, Optometry and Vision Science.

[27]  Susana Marcos,et al.  On the symmetry between eyes of wavefront aberration and cone directionality , 2000, Vision Research.

[28]  Richard A Eagle,et al.  Stereo correspondence in one-dimensional Gabor stimuli , 2000, Vision Research.

[29]  David A. Atchison,et al.  Optics of the Human Eye , 2023 .

[30]  R Navarro,et al.  Ocular aberrations before and after myopic corneal refractive surgery: LASIK-induced changes measured with laser ray tracing. , 2001, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[31]  O. Braddick,et al.  Seeing in Depth , 2008 .

[32]  D. Koch,et al.  Higher‐order aberrations from the internal optics of the eye , 2005, Journal of cataract and refractive surgery.

[33]  Arthur Bradley,et al.  Test-retest reliability of clinical Shack-Hartmann measurements. , 2004, Investigative ophthalmology & visual science.

[34]  S. McKee,et al.  Stereoscopic acuity with defocused and spatially filtered retinal images , 1980 .

[35]  Gordon E. Legge,et al.  Stereopsis and contrast , 1989, Vision Research.

[36]  David Williams,et al.  Visual performance after correcting the monochromatic and chromatic aberrations of the eye. , 2002, Journal of the Optical Society of America. A, Optics, image science, and vision.

[37]  F. Campbell,et al.  The effect of chromatic aberration on visual acuity , 1967, The Journal of physiology.

[38]  E. Hita,et al.  Influence of the Luminance and Opponent Chromatic Channels on Stereopsis with Randomdot Stereograms , 1997, Vision Research.

[39]  Clifton Schor,et al.  Interocular differences in contrast and spatial frequency: Effects on stereopsis and fusion , 1989, Vision Research.

[40]  Walton Nosé,et al.  Wavefront analysis and contrast sensitivity of aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses: a randomized prospective study. , 2006, American journal of ophthalmology.

[41]  Larry N Thibos,et al.  Metrics of optical quality derived from wave aberrations predict visual performance. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[42]  J. A. Díaz,et al.  Binocular summation of chromatic changes as measured by visual reaction time , 2002, Perception & psychophysics.

[43]  David R Williams,et al.  Neural compensation for the eye's optical aberrations. , 2004, Journal of vision.

[44]  D. Lara-Saucedo,et al.  Aberrations of the Human Eye in Visible and Near Infrared Illumination , 2003, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[45]  D Swift,et al.  The use of VisionWorks in visual psychophysics research. , 1997, Spatial vision.

[46]  N. Château,et al.  Effect of Induced Anisometropia on Binocular Through-Focus Contrast Sensitivity , 2001, Optometry and vision science : official publication of the American Academy of Optometry.

[47]  Carlos Salas,et al.  Impact of interocular differences in corneal asphericity on binocular summation. , 2003, American journal of ophthalmology.