Is high pressure postdilation safe in bioresorbable vascular scaffolds? Optical coherence tomography observations after noncompliant balloons inflated at more than 24 atmospheres
暂无分享,去创建一个
C. Di Mario | E. Fabris | G. Sinagra | G. Secco | N. Foin | I. Kilic | G. Caiazzo | Roberta Serdoz | Renick D. Lee | R. Serdoz
[1] C. Di Mario,et al. Very high-pressure dilatation for undilatable coronary lesions: indications and results with a new dedicated balloon. , 2016, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[2] Antonio Colombo,et al. Percutaneous coronary intervention with everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffolds in routine clinical practice: early and midterm outcomes from the European multicentre GHOST-EU registry. , 2015, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[3] J. Tijssen,et al. Initial experience and clinical evaluation of the Absorb bioresorbable vascular scaffold (BVS) in real-world practice: the AMC Single Centre Real World PCI Registry. , 2015, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[4] C. Mario,et al. Biodegradable stents: the golden future of angioplasty? , 2015, The Lancet.
[5] A. Colombo,et al. Comparison of early clinical outcomes between ABSORB bioresorbable vascular scaffold and everolimus‐eluting stent implantation in a real‐world population , 2015, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[6] C. Di Mario,et al. ABSORB biodegradable stents versus second-generation metal stents: a comparison study of 100 complex lesions treated under OCT guidance. , 2014, JACC. Cardiovascular interventions.
[7] Jong Chun Park,et al. Incidence, predictors, and clinical impact of tissue prolapse after stent implantation for saphenous vein graft disease: intravascular ultrasound study. , 2013, International journal of cardiology.
[8] H. Bezerra,et al. Frequency‐domain optical coherence tomography assessment of unprotected left main coronary artery disease—a comparison with intravascular ultrasound , 2013, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[9] Bernard Chevalier,et al. First Serial Assessment at 6 Months and 2 Years of the Second Generation of Absorb Everolimus-Eluting Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold: A Multi-Imaging Modality Study , 2012, Circulation. Cardiovascular interventions.
[10] Patrick W Serruys,et al. Angiographic maximal luminal diameter and appropriate deployment of the everolimus-eluting bioresorbable vascular scaffold as assessed by optical coherence tomography: an ABSORB cohort B trial sub-study. , 2012, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[11] N. Bruining,et al. Expert review document part 2: methodology, terminology and clinical applications of optical coherence tomography for the assessment of interventional procedures , 2012, European heart journal.
[12] Akiko Maehara,et al. Consensus standards for acquisition, measurement, and reporting of intravascular optical coherence tomography studies: a report from the International Working Group for Intravascular Optical Coherence Tomography Standardization and Validation. , 2012, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[13] P. Serruys,et al. Comparison of in vivo eccentricity and symmetry indices between metallic stents and bioresorbable vascular scaffolds: Insights from the ABSORB and SPIRIT trials , 2012, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[14] Bernard Chevalier,et al. Evaluation of the second generation of a bioresorbable everolimus-eluting vascular scaffold for the treatment of de novo coronary artery stenosis: 12-month clinical and imaging outcomes. , 2011, Journal of the American College of Cardiology.
[15] Bernard Chevalier,et al. Evaluation of the Second Generation of a Bioresorbable Everolimus Drug-Eluting Vascular Scaffold for Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Stenosis: Six-Month Clinical and Imaging Outcomes , 2010, Circulation.
[16] P. Serruys,et al. Three-year results of clinical follow-up after a bioresorbable everolimus-eluting scaffold in patients with de novo coronary artery disease: the ABSORB trial. , 2010, EuroIntervention : journal of EuroPCR in collaboration with the Working Group on Interventional Cardiology of the European Society of Cardiology.
[17] Peter Barlis,et al. Quantitative analysis of intracoronary optical coherence tomography measurements of stent strut apposition and tissue coverage. , 2010, International journal of cardiology.
[18] Hiroto Tsujioka,et al. Advantage of next‐generation frequency‐domain optical coherence tomography compared with conventional time‐domain system in the assessment of coronary lesion , 2010, Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions.
[19] E Regar,et al. Optical coherence tomography assessment of the acute effects of stent implantation on the vessel wall: a systematic quantitative approach , 2009, Heart.
[20] Patrick W. Serruys,et al. Comparación cuantitativa ex vivo e in vivo de las dimensiones del lumen medidas por tomografía de coherencia óptica y ecografía intravascular en arterias coronarias humanas , 2009 .
[21] P. Serruys,et al. Quantitative ex vivo and in vivo comparison of lumen dimensions measured by optical coherence tomography and intravascular ultrasound in human coronary arteries. , 2009, Revista espanola de cardiologia.
[22] Patrick W Serruys,et al. A bioabsorbable everolimus-eluting coronary stent system (ABSORB): 2-year outcomes and results from multiple imaging methods , 2009, The Lancet.
[23] Takashi Akasaka,et al. Comparison of vascular response after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation between patients with unstable and stable angina pectoris: a serial optical coherence tomography study. , 2008, JACC. Cardiovascular imaging.
[24] Stéphane G Carlier,et al. Clinical researchInterventional cardiologyStent underexpansion and residual reference segment stenosis are related to stent thrombosis after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation: An intravascular ultrasound study , 2005 .
[25] S. Goldberg,et al. Intracoronary ultrasound observations during stent implantation. , 1994, Circulation.