Optimal electrode selection for multi-channel electroencephalogram based detection of auditory steady-state responses.
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Jan Wouters,et al. Hearing assessment by recording multiple auditory steady-state responses: the influence of test duration , 2004, International journal of audiology.
[2] A. Dimitrijevic,et al. Efficient Stimuli for Evoking Auditory Steady-State Responses , 2003, Ear and hearing.
[3] O. Lins,et al. Comparison of Statistical Indicators for the Automatic Detection of 80 Hz Auditory Steady State Responses , 1997, Ear and hearing.
[4] S. Kuwada,et al. Optimizing the Stimuli to Evoke the Amplitude Modulation Following Response (AMFR) in Neonates , 2006, Ear and hearing.
[5] M. Cebulla,et al. Efficient Stimuli for Recording of the Amplitude Modulation Following Response: Estímulos eficientes para el registro de la Respuesta de Seguimiento a la Modulación de la Amplitud (AMFR) , 2001, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[6] T. Picton,et al. Human Cortical Responses to the Speech Envelope , 2008, Ear and hearing.
[7] Shigeyuki Kuwada,et al. Sources of the scalp-recorded amplitude-modulation following response. , 2002, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[8] M. Scherg,et al. Intracerebral Sources of Human Auditory Steady-State Responses , 2004, Brain Topography.
[9] Terence W. Picton,et al. Multiple Auditory Steady-State Responses to AM and FM Stimuli , 2001, Audiology and Neurotology.
[10] D. M. Green,et al. Signal detection theory and psychophysics , 1966 .
[11] G M Clark,et al. A comparison of steady-state evoked potentials to modulated tones in awake and sleeping humans. , 1991, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[12] C S van der Reijden,et al. Comparing Signal to Noise Ratios of Amplitude Modulation Following Responses from four EEG Derivations in Awake Normally Hearing Adults: Comparando tasas señal/ruido para modulación de amplitud en seguimiento a respuestas de cuatro derivaciones del EEG en adultos normo-oyentes despiertos , 2001, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[13] T W Picton,et al. Objective evaluation of aided thresholds using auditory steady-state responses. , 1998, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[14] Mario Cebulla,et al. Objective detection of auditory steady-state responses: comparison of one-sample and q-sample tests. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[15] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of reducing slow temporal modulations on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[16] Lucas H M Mens,et al. EEG Derivations Providing Auditory Steady-State Responses With High Signal-to-Noise Ratios in Infants , 2005, Ear and hearing.
[17] Terence W Picton,et al. Auditory Steady-State Responses to Exponential Modulation Envelopes , 2002, Ear and hearing.
[18] M. S. John,et al. MASTER: a Windows program for recording multiple auditory steady-state responses , 2000, Comput. Methods Programs Biomed..
[19] Jan Wouters,et al. Cortical auditory steady-state responses to low modulation rates , 2009, International journal of audiology.
[20] S. Makeig,et al. A 40-Hz auditory potential recorded from the human scalp. , 1981, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.
[21] Susan A Small,et al. Normal Ipsilateral/Contralateral Asymmetries in Infant Multiple Auditory Steady-State Responses to Air- and Bone-Conduction Stimuli , 2008, Ear and hearing.
[22] Marc Moonen,et al. A Procedural Framework for Auditory Steady-State Response Detection , 2009, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[23] Marc Moonen,et al. Multi-Channel Wiener Filtering Based Auditory Steady-State Response Detection , 2007, 2007 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing - ICASSP '07.
[24] R. Plomp,et al. Effect of temporal envelope smearing on speech reception. , 1994, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[25] T W Picton,et al. Potentials evoked by the sinusoidal modulation of the amplitude or frequency of a tone. , 1987, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[26] K. Saberi,et al. Cognitive restoration of reversed speech , 1999, Nature.
[27] Mario Cebulla,et al. New efficient stimuli for evoking frequency-specific auditory steady-state responses. , 2006, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[28] R V Shannon,et al. Speech Recognition with Primarily Temporal Cues , 1995, Science.
[29] R A Dobie,et al. A comparison of t test, F test, and coherence methods of detecting steady-state auditory-evoked potentials, distortion-product otoacoustic emissions, or other sinusoids. , 1996, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[30] Jeffrey Martin,et al. Electrophysiological correlates of word comprehension: Event-related potential (ERP) and independent component analysis (ICA) , 2009, International journal of audiology.
[31] James W. Hall. Handbook of Auditory Evoked Responses , 1991 .
[32] Terence W Picton,et al. Weighted averaging of steady-state responses , 2001, Clinical Neurophysiology.
[33] Terence W. Picton,et al. Auditory steady-state responses to multiple simultaneous stimuli , 1995 .
[34] M. Cebulla,et al. Objective Detection of the Amplitude Modulation Following Response (AMFR):Detectión objetiva de la respuesta consecuente de amplitud modulada (AMFR) , 2001, Audiology : official organ of the International Society of Audiology.
[35] T. Picton,et al. Human auditory steady-state responses: Respuestas auditivas de estado estable en humanos , 2003, International journal of audiology.
[36] Robert Plonsey,et al. Bioelectromagnetism: Principles and Applications of Bioelectric and Biomagnetic Fields , 1995 .
[37] Terence W Picton,et al. Human temporal auditory acuity as assessed by envelope following responses. , 2004, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.
[38] A. Herdman,et al. Thresholds determined using the monotic and dichotic multiple auditory steady-state response technique in normal-hearing subjects , 2001, Scandinavian audiology.
[39] Marc Moonen,et al. Improving Auditory Steady-State Response Detection Using Independent Component Analysis on Multichannel EEG Data , 2007, IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering.
[40] Joerg Bitzer,et al. Post-Filtering Techniques , 2001, Microphone Arrays.
[41] Astrid van Wieringen,et al. LIST and LINT: Sentences and numbers for quantifying speech understanding in severely impaired listeners for Flanders and the Netherlands , 2008, International journal of audiology.
[42] Jan Wouters,et al. The Influence of the Detection Paradigm in Recording Auditory Steady-State Responses , 2008, Ear and hearing.
[43] L. Scharf,et al. Statistical Signal Processing: Detection, Estimation, and Time Series Analysis , 1991 .
[44] Heleen Luts,et al. A flexible research platform for multi-channel auditory steady-state response measurements , 2008, Journal of Neuroscience Methods.
[45] Heleen Luts,et al. Comparison of MASTER and AUDERA for measurement of auditory steady-state responses Comparación de MASTER y AUDERA para la medición de las respuestas auditivas de estado estable , 2005, International journal of audiology.
[46] C. S. van der Reijden,et al. Signal-to-noise ratios of the auditory steady-state response from fifty-five EEG derivations in adults. , 2004, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[47] Jan Wouters,et al. Clinical Application of Dichotic Multiple-Stimulus Auditory Steady-State Responses in High-Risk Newborns and Young Children , 2006, Audiology and Neurotology.
[48] Terence W Picton,et al. Estimating the audiogram using multiple auditory steady-state responses. , 2002, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.
[49] Don H. Johnson,et al. Array Signal Processing: Concepts and Techniques , 1993 .