Not with a bang, but with a whimper: Understanding delays in semiconductor supply chain dynamics

The semiconductor industry is characterized by high volatility: rapid increases in market demand are followed by sharp downturns. Therefore, one would expect its supply chains to be very fast in adjusting to changes in demand. However, empirical data from one leading semiconductor firm suggest that delays in adjusting to the latest downturn of the market in 2001 have been considerable. For instance, inventory levels have taken two years to come back in line. Generally, these delays and the dynamics that are causing them are not well understood within the industry. This paper presents research that explains these delays by means of a system dynamics simulation model that captures the overall supply chain structure, the generic decision-making processes and the associated supply chain dynamics typical for this industry. The model is based upon pre-existing and well-tested generic supply chain models from the literature. It has been tailored and validated with representatives from a major European IC manufacturer. Its dynamic performance has been calibrated using four years of data on key performance aspects such as inventory levels, cycle times, demand flexibility and delivery quality. With this model, several SCM policies are explored that are effective in improving both sales and supply chain performance, such as more aggressive capacity build-up, lower capacity utilization targets and higher end product buffer stocks.

[1]  Frederik D. Wiersema,et al.  The Discipline of Market Leaders , 1995 .

[2]  Henk Akkermans,et al.  Managing IT infrastructure standardisation in the networked manufacturing firm , 2002 .

[3]  Fangruo Chen Decentralized supply chains subject to information delays , 1999 .

[4]  Jack R. Meredith,et al.  Theory Building through Conceptual Methods , 1993 .

[5]  S. Hoekstra,et al.  Integral Logistic Structures: Developing Customer-Oriented Goods Flow , 1992 .

[6]  Gérard P. Cachon,et al.  Managing Supply Chain Demand Variability with Scheduled Ordering Policies , 1999 .

[7]  Frank Y. Chen,et al.  Quantifying the Bullwhip Effect in a Simple Supply Chain: The Impact of Forecasting, Lead Times, and Information.: The Impact of Forecasting, Lead Times, and Information. , 2000 .

[8]  Vineet Padmanabhan,et al.  Comments on "Information Distortion in a Supply Chain: The Bullwhip Effect" , 1997, Manag. Sci..

[9]  Andy Neely,et al.  Performance measurement system design , 1995 .

[10]  Henk Akkermans,et al.  Travail, transparency and trust: A case study of computer-supported collaborative supply chain planning in high-tech electronics , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[11]  Henk Akkermans,et al.  Renga: A systems approach to facilitating inter-organizational network development , 2001 .

[12]  J Swanson,et al.  Business Dynamics—Systems Thinking and Modeling for a Complex World , 2002, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[13]  J. Fransoo,et al.  Measuring the bullwhip effect in the supply chain , 2000 .

[14]  Rogelio Oliva,et al.  Cutting Corners and Working Overtime: Quality Erosion in the Service Industry , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[15]  Thom J. Hodgson,et al.  Optimal hybrid push/pull control strategies for a parallel multistage system: Part II , 1991 .

[16]  J. Forrester D-4079-1 1 Market Growth as Influenced by Capital Investment ∗ , 1999 .

[17]  Charles H. Fine Clockspeed: Winning Industry Control In The Age Of Temporary Advantage , 1998 .

[18]  John D. W. Morecroft,et al.  A SYSTEMS PERSPECTIVE ON MATERIAL REQUIREMENTS PLANNING , 1983 .

[19]  G. N. Evans,et al.  Dynamic Supply Chain Performance: Assessing the Impact of Information Systems , 1993 .

[20]  Henk Akkermans,et al.  Clients' opinions on group model-building : an exploratory study , 1997 .

[21]  D. Sterman,et al.  Misperceptions of Feedback in a Dynamic Decision Making Experiment , 1989 .

[22]  P. A. J. Berendsa,et al.  Cyclicality of capital-intensive industries : a system dynamics simulation study of the paper industry , 2001 .

[23]  M. Broadbent Measuring business performance , 1999 .

[24]  J. Forrester Industrial Dynamics , 1997 .

[25]  Barbara B. Flynn,et al.  Empirical research methods in operations management , 1990 .

[26]  Nelson P. Repenning,et al.  A Simulation-Based Approach to Understanding the Dynamics of Innovation Implementation , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[27]  Steffen Bayer,et al.  Business dynamics: Systems thinking and modeling for a complex world , 2004 .

[28]  A. Sage,et al.  Economic Cycles: An Analysis of Underlying Causes , 1977, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics.

[29]  Simon Peck,et al.  Group Model Building: Facilitating Team Learning Using System Dynamics , 1996, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[30]  B. Vos,et al.  Virtuous and vicious cycles on the road towards international supply chain management , 1999 .

[31]  Michael A. Zazanis,et al.  Push and Pull Production Systems: Issues and Comparisons , 1992, Oper. Res..

[32]  van Je Joan Aken,et al.  On the Control of Complex Industrial Organizations , 1978 .

[33]  Morris A. Cohen,et al.  The Stabilizing Effect of Inventory in Supply Chains , 1998, Oper. Res..

[34]  H. Akkermans Modelling with managers : participative business modelling for effective strategic decision-making , 1995 .