Craftsmanship in the machine: sustainability through new roles in building craft at the technologized building site

The building industry is becoming increasingly characterized by automated production, and in line with this, the nature of craftsmanship is transforming. In this article, we look for a sustainable path for this transformation through a case study that follows a team of carpenters building a set of tower blocks at a high-tech building site using “lean” construction techniques and robotic production technology. The builders are organized according to complex schedules of lean construction, making work at the building site resemble that of a large machine. The builders hold multiple roles within this machine: more than simply “living mechanisms” inside the machine, they also take on more parental roles as “machinists,” employing their crafting skills in planning, problem solving, improvising, coordinating and fettling in order to make the building machine run smoothly and to minimize environmental uncertainty. The craftsmanship in action is characterized by what we call workmanship of uncertainty – the ability to produce certain results in uncertain conditions. We identify this as the collective skill of a community of practice. The sustainability of craftsmanship in the machine is analyzed according to three kinds of sustainability: cultural, social and ecological. We suggest that all three forms depend on the building company’s ability to provide working conditions that allow the builders to form stable communities of practice in order to perform, share and develop craftmanship. Finally, we show that working in and with technological production systems does not require fewer skills (of craftsmanship) than traditional building, but a nuanced application of these skills.

[1]  Etienne Wenger,et al.  Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning, and Identity , 1998 .

[2]  Henrik D. Finsrud,et al.  Lean organisering i norsk arbeidsliv: slutten på medvirkning? , 2012, Magma.

[3]  Communities of peer practitioners. Experiences from an Academic Writing Group , 2017 .

[4]  Knut Holtan Sørensen,et al.  How energy efficiency fails in the building industry , 2009 .

[5]  Iris D. Tommelein,et al.  The foundations of lean construction , 2002 .

[6]  Emil Røyrvik The Allure of Capitalism: An Ethnography of Management and the Global Economy in Crisis , 2011 .

[7]  Alex. B. W. Kennedy,et al.  The Kinematics of Machinery: Outlines of a Theory of Machines , 2006 .

[8]  O. Sjaastad Epilogue , 1891, The Hospital.

[9]  T. Ingold The perception of the environment : essays on livelihood, dwelling and skill , 2000 .

[10]  Lauri Koskela,et al.  Lean Production in Construction , 1993 .

[11]  Bengt Klefsjö,et al.  The machine that changed the world , 2008 .

[12]  Bjørn Gustavsen,et al.  The Nordic Model of Work Organization , 2011 .

[13]  K. Schwab The Fourth Industrial Revolution , 2013 .

[14]  Richard E. Susskind,et al.  The Future of the Professions: How Technology Will Transform the Work of Human Experts , 2016 .

[15]  Takahiro Fujimoto,et al.  Lean and reflective production: the dynamic nature of production models , 2007 .

[16]  K. Marx,et al.  Capital; a Critique of Political Economy; Volume 3 , 1982, American Political Science Review.

[17]  David Pye,et al.  The Nature and Art of Workmanship , 1968 .

[18]  José Taberner Guasp The Precariat. The New Dangerous Class , 2014 .

[19]  Competitive low carbon economy in 2050 , 2013 .

[20]  Michael A. Osborne,et al.  The future of employment: How susceptible are jobs to computerisation? , 2017 .

[21]  G. Standing,et al.  Social dumping, catch-up or convergence? Europe in a comparative global context , 2000 .

[22]  Herman Glenn Ballard,et al.  THE LAST PLANNER SYSTEM OF PRODUCTION CONTROL , 2000 .