State Lotteries and Consumer Behavior

Despite considerable controversy surrounding the use of state lotteries as a means of public finance, little is known about their consumer consequences. This project investigates two central questions about lotteries. First, do state lotteries primarily crowd out other forms of gambling, or do they crowd out non-gambling consumption? Second, does consumer demand for lottery games respond to expected returns, as maximizing behavior predicts, or do consumers appear to be misinformed about the risks and returns of lottery gambles? Analyses of multiple sources of micro-level gambling data demonstrate that lottery spending does not substitute for other forms of gambling. Household consumption data suggest that household lottery gambling crowds out approximately $38 per month, or two percent, of other household consumption, with larger proportional reductions among low-income households. Demand for lottery products responds positively to the expected value of the gamble, controlling for other moments of the gamble and product characteristics; this suggests that consumers of lottery products are not simply uninformed, but are perhaps making fully-informed purchases.

[1]  Daniel L. Rubin,et al.  Estimating the Effect of Unearned Income on Labor Supply, Earnings, Savings, and Consumption: Evidence from a Survey of Lottery Players , 1999 .

[2]  F. Scott,et al.  LOTTERY EFFECTS ON PARI-MUTUEL TAX REVENUES , 1989, National Tax Journal.

[3]  T. Garrett,et al.  Gamblers favor skewness, not risk: Further evidence from United States’ lottery games , 1999 .

[4]  Charles T. Clotfelter,et al.  The "Gambler&Apos;S Fallacy" in Lottery Play , 1991 .

[5]  E. Duflo Grandmothers and grandaughters : the effects of old age pension on child health in South Africa , 2000 .

[6]  Joseph H. Golec,et al.  Bettors Love Skewness, Not Risk, at the Horse Track , 1998, Journal of Political Economy.

[7]  J. Mullahy Instrumental-Variable Estimation of Count Data Models: Applications to Models of Cigarette Smoking Behavior , 1997, Review of Economics and Statistics.

[8]  P. Cook,et al.  On the Economics of State Lotteries , 1990 .

[9]  A. Hansen The Tax Incidence of the Colorado State Lottery Instant Game , 1995 .

[10]  E. Langer,et al.  Heads I win, tails it's chance: The illusion of control as a function of the sequence of outcomes in a purely chance task. , 1975 .

[11]  F. Scott,et al.  Probability of purchase, amount of purchase, and the demographic incidence of the lottery tax , 1994 .

[12]  Martin Browning,et al.  Efficient Intra-Household Allocations: A General Characterization and Empirical Tests , 1998 .

[13]  R. Simmons,et al.  Elasticity of Demand for UK National Lottery Tickets , 2000, National Tax Journal.

[14]  Philip J. Cook,et al.  Notes: The Gambler's Fallacy in Lottery Play , 1993 .

[15]  F. Scott,et al.  THE DEMAND FOR WAGERING ON STATE-OPERATED LOTTO GAMES , 1993, National Tax Journal.

[16]  William D. Berry,et al.  State Lottery Adoptions as Policy Innovations: An Event History Analysis , 1990, American Political Science Review.

[17]  A. Tversky,et al.  BELIEF IN THE LAW OF SMALL NUMBERS , 1971, Pediatrics.

[18]  A. Worthington Implicit Finance in Gambling Expenditures: Australian Evidence on Socioeconomic and Demographic Tax Incidence , 2001 .

[19]  L. J. Savage,et al.  The Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk , 1948, Journal of Political Economy.

[20]  Mukhtar M. Ali Probability and Utility Estimates for Racetrack Bettors , 1977, Journal of Political Economy.

[21]  E. Langer The illusion of control. , 1975 .

[22]  A. Tversky,et al.  Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and Biases , 1974, Science.

[23]  C. Udry Gender, Agricultural Production, and the Theory of the Household , 1996, Journal of Political Economy.

[24]  R. Thaler,et al.  Anomalies Parimutuel Betting Markets: Racetracks and Lotteries , 1988 .

[25]  P. Cook,et al.  The Peculiar Scale Economies of Lotto , 1991 .

[26]  J. G. Cragg Some Statistical Models for Limited Dependent Variables with Application to the Demand for Durable Goods , 1971 .

[27]  E. Langer,et al.  The effects of choice and enhanced personal responsibility for the aged: a field experiment in an institutional setting. , 1976, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[28]  J. Angrist,et al.  Digitized by the Internet Archive in 2011 with Funding from Estimation of Limited-dependent Variable Models with Dummy Endogenous Regressors: Simple Strategies for Empirical Practice , 2011 .

[29]  Dek Terrell,et al.  A test of the gambler's fallacy: Evidence from pari-mutuel games , 1994 .

[30]  A. Tversky,et al.  Prospect theory: analysis of decision under risk , 1979 .

[31]  J. Edell,et al.  State Lotteries at the Turn of the Century: Report to the National Gambling Impact Study Commission , 1999 .

[32]  S. Shapiro,et al.  The Economic Consequences of State Lotteries , 1991 .

[33]  Kevin M. Murphy,et al.  A Theory of Rational Addiction , 1988, Journal of Political Economy.

[34]  Charles J. Spindler The Lottery and Education: Robbing Peter to Pay Paul? , 1995 .

[35]  P. Cook,et al.  Selling Hope: State Lotteries in America. , 1990 .

[36]  S. Shapiro,et al.  The Cross Effects of Lottery Taxes On Alternative State Tax Revenue , 1993 .