Observations on the relations among occlusion effect, compliance, and vent size.

In a clinical experiment, it was found that there is a high correlation between the compliance measured by tympanometry and the minimum size of the earmold vent, which just solves the client's occlusion problem related to his/her own voice when using a hearing aid. For ears with sensorineural hearing losses, compliance explained 59 percent of the variation in vent size, whereas the average low-frequency hearing loss explained as little as 0.3 percent. In a laboratory experiment, the objective occlusion effect measured with the participants' own voices showed a similar relationship with compliance. Whereas the former relationship between compliance and vent size may be explained by a simple model, the latter relationship turns out to be the opposite of what a first-order model predicts. Hence, compliance must be indicative of another aspect of the occlusion mechanism, which has a more profound influence on the observed occlusion effect than compliance itself.

[1]  Ruth A. Bentler.  CICs: Some Practical Considerations , 1994 .

[2]  Igal Savion,et al.  Bone conduction experiments in humans – a fluid pathway from bone to ear , 2000, Hearing Research.

[3]  Janet E. Shanks,et al.  Tympanometry , 1981, Ear and hearing.

[4]  Mie Østergaard Hansen.  Occlusion effects, Part I , 1997 .

[5]  Michael R. Stinson,et al.  Air conducted and body conducted sound produced by own voice , 1998 .

[6]  G A Studebaker,et al.  Investigation of the acoustics of earmold vents. , 1970, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  J M Kates.  Acoustic effects in in-the-ear hearing aid response: results from a computer simulation. , 1988, Ear and hearing.

[8]  W. Staab.  Introduction to Deep Canal Principles , 1996 .

[9]  H. Gustav Mueller,et al.  Studies of the Hearing Aid Occlusion Effect , 1996 .

[10]  Jozef J. Zwislocki,et al.  Acoustic Attenuation between the Ears , 1953 .

[11]  C. G. Wright.  Development of the human external ear. , 1997, Journal of the American Academy of Audiology.

[12]  Stig Arlinger,et al.  Manual of Practical Audiometry , 1991 .

[13]  H W EWERTSEN,et al.  Hearing aid evaluation. , 1956, A.M.A. archives of otolaryngology.

[14]  R. Cox,et al.  Comparison of in-the-ear and over-the-ear hearing aid fittings. , 1986, The Journal of speech and hearing disorders.

[15]  H. Gustav Mueller,et al.  CIC Hearing Aids: What Is Their Impact On The Occlusion Effect? , 1994 .

[16]  S. Kochkin.  MarkeTrak V: “Why my hearing aids are in the drawer” The consumers' perspective , 2000 .

[17]  A Leijon,et al.  Quantization error in clinical pure-tone audiometry. , 1992, Scandinavian audiology.

[18]  M. Gaihede.  Tympanometric preconditioning of the tympanic membrane , 1996, Hearing Research.