Structure validation by Cα geometry: ϕ,ψ and Cβ deviation

Geometrical validation around the Cα is described, with a new Cβ measure and updated Ramachandran plot. Deviation of the observed Cβ atom from ideal position provides a single measure encapsulating the major structure‐validation information contained in bond angle distortions. Cβ deviation is sensitive to incompatibilities between sidechain and backbone caused by misfit conformations or inappropriate refinement restraints. A new ϕ,ψ plot using density‐dependent smoothing for 81,234 non‐Gly, non‐Pro, and non‐prePro residues with B < 30 from 500 high‐resolution proteins shows sharp boundaries at critical edges and clear delineation between large empty areas and regions that are allowed but disfavored. One such region is the γ‐turn conformation near +75°,−60°, counted as forbidden by common structure‐validation programs; however, it occurs in well‐ordered parts of good structures, it is overrepresented near functional sites, and strain is partly compensated by the γ‐turn H‐bond. Favored and allowed ϕ,ψ regions are also defined for Pro, pre‐Pro, and Gly (important because Gly ϕ,ψ angles are more permissive but less accurately determined). Details of these accurate empirical distributions are poorly predicted by previous theoretical calculations, including a region left of α‐helix, which rates as favorable in energy yet rarely occurs. A proposed factor explaining this discrepancy is that crowding of the two‐peptide NHs permits donating only a single H‐bond. New calculations by Hu et al. [Proteins 2002 (this issue)] for Ala and Gly dipeptides, using mixed quantum mechanics and molecular mechanics, fit our nonrepetitive data in excellent detail. To run our geometrical evaluations on a user‐uploaded file, see MOLPROBITY (http://kinemage.biochem.duke.edu) or RAMPAGE (http://www‐cryst.bioc.cam.ac.uk/rampage). Proteins 2003;50:437–450. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.

[1]  M. Huggins The Structure of Fibrous Proteins. , 1943 .

[2]  G. N. Ramachandran,et al.  Stereochemistry of polypeptide chain configurations. , 1963, Journal of molecular biology.

[3]  G. N. Ramachandran,et al.  Stereochemical criteria for polypeptide and protein chain conformations. II. Allowed conformations for a pair of peptide units. , 1965, Biophysical journal.

[4]  G. N. Ramachandran,et al.  Conformation of polypeptides and proteins. , 1968, Advances in protein chemistry.

[5]  B. Matthews The γ Turn. Evidence for a New Folded Conformation in Proteins , 1972 .

[6]  G. Némethy,et al.  The γ Turn, a Possible Folded Conformation of the Polypeptide Chain. Comparison with the β Turn , 1972 .

[7]  B L Trus,et al.  Tuna cytochrome c at 2.0 A resolution. III. Coordinate optimization and comparison of structures. , 1977, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[8]  Tuna cytochrome c at 2.0 A resolution. II. Ferrocytochrome structure analysis. , 1977, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[9]  D. Peters,et al.  Quantum theory of the structure and bonding in proteins. Part 8. The alanine dipeptide , 1981 .

[10]  J. Richardson,et al.  The anatomy and taxonomy of protein structure. , 1981, Advances in protein chemistry.

[11]  D. Peters,et al.  Quantum theory of the structure and bonding in proteins. XVI: The asparagine dipeptide , 1982 .

[12]  B. L. Sibanda,et al.  Beta-hairpin families in globular proteins. , 1985, Nature.

[13]  G. Rose,et al.  Turns in peptides and proteins. , 1985, Advances in protein chemistry.

[14]  B. L. Sibanda,et al.  β-Hairpin families in globular proteins , 1985, Nature.

[15]  J. Ponder,et al.  Tertiary templates for proteins. Use of packing criteria in the enumeration of allowed sequences for different structural classes. , 1987, Journal of molecular biology.

[16]  李幼升,et al.  Ph , 1989 .

[17]  G. Fasman Prediction of Protein Structure and the Principles of Protein Conformation , 2012, Springer US.

[18]  J. Richardson,et al.  Principles and Patterns of Protein Conformation , 1989 .

[19]  H. Scheraga,et al.  A comparison of the CHARMM, AMBER and ECEPP potentials for peptides. II. Phi-psi maps for N-acetyl alanine N'-methyl amide: comparisons, contrasts and simple experimental tests. , 1989, Journal of biomolecular structure & dynamics.

[20]  E. Milner-White,et al.  Situations of gamma-turns in proteins. Their relation to alpha-helices, beta-sheets and ligand binding sites. , 1990, Journal of molecular biology.

[21]  S. Krimm,et al.  AB INITIO FORCE FIELDS OF ALANINE DIPEPTIDE IN FOUR NON-HYDROGEN BONDED CONFORMATIONS , 1990 .

[22]  J Moult,et al.  Analysis of the steric strain in the polypeptide backbone of protein molecules , 1991, Proteins.

[23]  R. Huber,et al.  Accurate Bond and Angle Parameters for X-ray Protein Structure Refinement , 1991 .

[24]  Charles L. Brooks,et al.  Theoretical study of blocked glycine and alanine peptide analogs , 1991 .

[25]  J. Thornton,et al.  Stereochemical quality of protein structure coordinates , 1992, Proteins.

[26]  D C Richardson,et al.  The kinemage: A tool for scientific communication , 1992, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[27]  Peter A. Kollman,et al.  Ab initio SCF and MP2 calculations on four low-energy conformers of N-acetyl-N'-methylalaninamide , 1992 .

[28]  A. Brünger Free R value: a novel statistical quantity for assessing the accuracy of crystal structures , 1992, Nature.

[29]  J. Thornton,et al.  PROCHECK: a program to check the stereochemical quality of protein structures , 1993 .

[30]  Lothar Schäfer,et al.  Evaluation of the dipeptide approximation in peptide modeling by ab initio geometry optimizations of oligopeptides , 1993 .

[31]  T A Jones,et al.  The sequence, crystal structure determination and refinement of two crystal forms of lipase B from Candida antarctica. , 1994, Structure.

[32]  U. Hobohm,et al.  Enlarged representative set of protein structures , 1994, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[33]  D. Shortle,et al.  Evidence for strained interactions between side-chains and the polypeptide backbone. , 1994, Journal of molecular biology.

[34]  G J Kleywegt,et al.  Phi/psi-chology: Ramachandran revisited. , 1996, Structure.

[35]  S. Crennell,et al.  The structures of Salmonella typhimurium LT2 neuraminidase and its complexes with three inhibitors at high resolution. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  V. Hilser,et al.  The magnitude of the backbone conformational entropy change in protein folding , 1996, Proteins.

[37]  P. Karplus Experimentally observed conformation‐dependent geometry and hidden strain in proteins , 1996, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[38]  C. Sander,et al.  Errors in protein structures , 1996, Nature.

[39]  K. Gunasekaran,et al.  Disallowed Ramachandran conformations of amino acid residues in protein structures. , 1996, Journal of molecular biology.

[40]  S. Steinbacher,et al.  β‐Turn propensities as paradigms for the analysis of structural motifs to engineer protein stability , 1997, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[41]  Richard A. Dixon,et al.  Structure of chalcone synthase and the molecular basis of plant polyketide biosynthesis , 1999, Nature Structural Biology.

[42]  R E Hubbard,et al.  Locating interaction sites on proteins: The crystal structure of thermolysin soaked in 2% to 100% isopropanol , 1999, Proteins.

[43]  F E Cohen,et al.  Conformational attractors on the Ramachandran map. , 1999, Acta crystallographica. Section D, Biological crystallography.

[44]  M. Zalis,et al.  Visualizing and quantifying molecular goodness-of-fit: small-probe contact dots with explicit hydrogen atoms. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[45]  J. Richardson,et al.  Asparagine and glutamine: using hydrogen atom contacts in the choice of side-chain amide orientation. , 1999, Journal of molecular biology.

[46]  T. N. Bhat,et al.  The Protein Data Bank , 2000, Nucleic Acids Res..

[47]  J. Richardson,et al.  The penultimate rotamer library , 2000, Proteins.

[48]  D. Richardson,et al.  Exploring steric constraints on protein mutations using MAGE/PROBE , 2000, Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society.

[49]  D. Pal,et al.  The interrelationships of side-chain and main-chain conformations in proteins. , 2001, Progress in biophysics and molecular biology.

[50]  Eddy Arnold,et al.  Crystallography of biological macromolecules , 2001 .

[51]  Tom L Blundell,et al.  Structural enzymology of Li(+)-sensitive/Mg(2+)-dependent phosphatases. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[52]  T. Hahn International tables for crystallography , 2002 .

[53]  Pinak Chakrabarti,et al.  On residues in the disallowed region of the Ramachandran map. , 2002, Biopolymers.

[54]  G. Langlet,et al.  International Tables for Crystallography , 2002 .

[55]  Gerard J Kleywegt,et al.  Homo crystallographicus--quo vadis? , 2002, Structure.

[56]  J. Hermans,et al.  Comparison of a QM/MM force field and molecular mechanics force fields in simulations of alanine and glycine “dipeptides” (Ace‐Ala‐Nme and Ace‐Gly‐Nme) in water in relation to the problem of modeling the unfolded peptide backbone in solution , 2003, Proteins.

[57]  W. Denny,et al.  CRYSTALLOGRAPHY OF BIOLOGICAL MACROMOLECULES , 2005 .