Public risk perception and emotion on Twitter during the Covid-19 pandemic

Successful navigation of the Covid-19 pandemic is predicated on public cooperation with safety measures and appropriate perception of risk, in which emotion and attention play important roles. Signatures of public emotion and attention are present in social media data, thus natural language analysis of this text enables near-to-real-time monitoring of indicators of public risk perception. We compare key epidemiological indicators of the progression of the pandemic with indicators of the public perception of the pandemic constructed from $$\sim 20$$ ∼ 20 million unique Covid-19-related tweets from 12 countries posted between 10th March and 14th June 2020. We find evidence of psychophysical numbing: Twitter users increasingly fixate on mortality, but in a decreasingly emotional and increasingly analytic tone. Semantic network analysis based on word co-occurrences reveals changes in the emotional framing of Covid-19 casualties that are consistent with this hypothesis. We also find that the average attention afforded to national Covid-19 mortality rates is modelled accurately with the Weber–Fechner and power law functions of sensory perception. Our parameter estimates for these models are consistent with estimates from psychological experiments, and indicate that users in this dataset exhibit differential sensitivity by country to the national Covid-19 death rates. Our work illustrates the potential utility of social media for monitoring public risk perception and guiding public communication during crisis scenarios.

[1]  D. Spiegelhalter,et al.  Risk perceptions of COVID-19 around the world , 2020, Journal of Risk Research.

[2]  Margaret L. Kern,et al.  Estimating geographic subjective well-being from Twitter: A comparison of dictionary and data-driven language methods , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[3]  Zellig S. Harris,et al.  Distributional Structure , 1954 .

[4]  Maeve Duggan,et al.  Social Media Update 2016 , 2016 .

[5]  Juan M. Banda,et al.  A Large-Scale COVID-19 Twitter Chatter Dataset for Open Scientific Research—An International Collaboration , 2020, Epidemiolgia.

[6]  S. S. Stevens On the psychophysical law. , 1957, Psychological review.

[7]  B. Mellers,et al.  Affective responses to uncertain real-world outcomes: Sentiment change on Twitter , 2019, PloS one.

[8]  Luke S Sloan Who Tweets in the United Kingdom? Profiling the Twitter Population Using the British Social Attitudes Survey 2015 , 2017 .

[9]  C. Summers,et al.  Collective violence : harmful behavior in groups and governments , 1999 .

[10]  Han Zhang,et al.  Anxious or Angry? Effects of Discrete Emotions on the Perceived Helpfulness of Online Reviews , 2014, MIS Q..

[11]  Tom Britton,et al.  A Weighted Configuration Model and Inhomogeneous Epidemics , 2011 .

[12]  Jeremy Blackburn,et al.  "Go eat a bat, Chang!": An Early Look on the Emergence of Sinophobic Behavior on Web Communities in the Face of COVID-19 , 2020, ArXiv.

[13]  Stephen M. Johnson,et al.  Insensitivity to the Value of Human Life: A Study of Psychophysical Numbing , 1997 .

[14]  C. N. Cofer,et al.  Discrepancy from expectation in relation to affect and motivation: tests of McClelland's hypothesis. , 1968, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology.

[15]  R. Lifton Beyond psychic numbing: a call to awareness. , 1982, The American journal of orthopsychiatry.

[16]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Risk as Feelings , 2001, Psychological bulletin.

[17]  Sudeep Bhatia,et al.  Predicting Risk Perception: New Insights from Data Science , 2019, Manag. Sci..

[18]  Akhila Sri Manasa Venigalla,et al.  Mood of India During Covid-19 - An Interactive Web Portal Based on Emotion Analysis of Twitter Data , 2020, CSCW Companion.

[19]  Paul Slovic,et al.  “If I look at the mass I will never act”: Psychic numbing and genocide , 2007, Judgment and Decision Making.

[20]  Zellig S. Harris,et al.  Distributional Structure , 1954 .

[21]  Peter M. Sandman,et al.  Responding to Community Outrage , 1993 .

[22]  W. Bruine de Bruin,et al.  Relationships Between Initial COVID-19 Risk Perceptions and Protective Health Behaviors: A National Survey , 2020, American Journal of Preventive Medicine.

[23]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  What types of COVID-19 conspiracies are populated by Twitter bots? , 2020, First Monday.

[24]  Christopher Y. Olivola The Cognitive Psychology of Sensitivity to Human Fatalities , 2015 .

[25]  B. Payne,et al.  Escaping affect: how motivated emotion regulation creates insensitivity to mass suffering. , 2011, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[26]  Yoed N. Kenett,et al.  Investigating the structure of semantic networks in low and high creative persons , 2014, Front. Hum. Neurosci..

[27]  Isabell M. Welpe,et al.  Predicting Elections with Twitter: What 140 Characters Reveal about Political Sentiment , 2010, ICWSM.

[28]  THE EFFECT OF DIFFERENTIAL FAILURE ON EXPECTATION OF SUCCESS, REPORTED ANXIETY, AND RESPONSE UNCERTAINTY. , 1963, Journal of personality.

[29]  Jennings Bryant,et al.  Theory and Research in Mass Communication , 2004 .

[30]  G. Gescheider Psychophysics: The Fundamentals , 1997 .

[31]  Peter D. Turney,et al.  Emotions Evoked by Common Words and Phrases: Using Mechanical Turk to Create an Emotion Lexicon , 2010, HLT-NAACL 2010.

[32]  Timothy Jay,et al.  The pragmatics of swearing , 2008 .

[33]  Ian Dawson,et al.  Psychophysical Numbing: When Lives Are Valued Less as the Lives at Risk Increase , 1999 .

[34]  M. McCombs Agenda setting function of mass media , 1977 .

[35]  Daniele Quercia,et al.  How Epidemic Psychology Works on Social Media: Evolution of responses to the COVID-19 pandemic , 2020, ArXiv.

[36]  M. Newman Analysis of weighted networks. , 2004, Physical review. E, Statistical, nonlinear, and soft matter physics.

[37]  J. Townsend,et al.  The Oxford Handbook of Computational and Mathematical Psychology , 2015 .

[38]  M. Roser,et al.  Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19) , 2020 .

[39]  R. Lifton Beyond psychic numbing. A call to awareness , 1984 .

[40]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Bots increase exposure to negative and inflammatory content in online social systems , 2018, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[41]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Seeing without Seeing? Degraded Conscious Vision in a Blindsight Patient , 2008, PloS one.

[42]  Sudeep Bhatia,et al.  Vector Space Semantic Models Predict Subjective Probability Judgments for Real-World Events , 2016, CogSci.

[43]  Ryan L. Boyd,et al.  The Development and Psychometric Properties of LIWC2015 , 2015 .

[44]  J. Russell,et al.  The circumplex model of affect: An integrative approach to affective neuroscience, cognitive development, and psychopathology , 2005, Development and Psychopathology.

[45]  Emilio Ferrara,et al.  Social Bots Distort the 2016 US Presidential Election Online Discussion , 2016, First Monday.

[46]  D. Shaw,et al.  Agenda setting function of mass media , 1972 .

[47]  J. Pennebaker,et al.  The Psychological Meaning of Words: LIWC and Computerized Text Analysis Methods , 2010 .

[48]  Jean-Loup Guillaume,et al.  Fast unfolding of communities in large networks , 2008, 0803.0476.

[49]  Massimo Stella,et al.  #lockdown: network-enhanced emotional profiling at the times of COVID-19 , 2020, ArXiv.

[50]  Paul Slovic,et al.  Risk Perception and Behaviors: Anticipating and Responding to Crises , 2012, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[51]  K. Gurney,et al.  Network ‘Small-World-Ness’: A Quantitative Method for Determining Canonical Network Equivalence , 2008, PloS one.

[52]  Yael V. Hochberg,et al.  Risk Perception Through the Lens of Politics in the Time of the Covid-19 Pandemic , 2020, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[53]  David G. Rand,et al.  Using social and behavioural science to support COVID-19 pandemic response , 2020, Nature Human Behaviour.

[54]  Ramit Sawhney,et al.  Did you offend me? Classification of Offensive Tweets in Hinglish Language , 2018, ALW.

[55]  Niloy Ganguly,et al.  Understanding Language Preference for Expression of Opinion and Sentiment: What do Hindi-English Speakers do on Twitter? , 2016, EMNLP.

[56]  Yoed N. Kenett,et al.  Cognitive Network Science: A Review of Research on Cognition through the Lens of Network Representations, Processes, and Dynamics , 2018, Complex..