Statistics Used to Assess Monitors and Monitoring Applications
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] P. Barash,et al. Comparing methods of measurement: an alternative approach. , 1990, Anesthesiology.
[2] L. Critchley,et al. Systematic error of cardiac output measured by bolus thermodilution with a pulmonary artery catheter compared with that measured by an aortic flow probe in a pig model. , 2013, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.
[3] Dietmar Stöckl,et al. Application of the Bland-Altman plot for interpretation of method-comparison studies: a critical investigation of its practice. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.
[4] F. Michard. Thinking outside the (cardiac output) box. , 2012, Critical care medicine.
[5] L. Nilsson,et al. Researcher bias and generalization of results in bias and limits of agreement analyses: a commentary based on the review of 50 Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica papers using the Altman–Bland approach , 2006, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.
[6] G. Drummond,et al. Reporting of method comparison studies: a review of advice, an assessment of current practice, and specific suggestions for future reports. , 2016, British journal of anaesthesia.
[7] D. Altman,et al. Agreement Between Methods of Measurement with Multiple Observations Per Individual , 2007, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.
[8] S. Gottlieb,et al. Impedance cardiography: More questions than answers , 2006, Current cardiology reports.
[9] L. Critchley,et al. Reliability of lithium dilution cardiac output in anaesthetized sheep. , 2013, British journal of anaesthesia.
[10] L. Critchley. Meta-analyses of Bland-Altman-style cardiac output validation studies: good, but do they provide answers to all our questions? , 2017, British journal of anaesthesia.
[11] Mohammed Saeed,et al. The cardiac output from blood pressure algorithms trial. , 2009, Critical care medicine.
[12] G. Drummond. Limits of Agreement With Confidence Intervals Are Necessary to Assess Comparability of Measurement Devices. , 2017, Anesthesia and analgesia.
[13] M. Singer,et al. Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care ( PAC-Man ) : a randomised controlled trial , 2022 .
[14] L. Critchley. Bias and precision statistics: should we still adhere to the 30% benchmark for cardiac output monitor validation studies? , 2011, Anesthesiology.
[15] A. Perrino,et al. Transtracheal Doppler cardiac output monitoring: comparison to thermodilution during noncardiac surgery. , 1994, Anesthesia and analgesia.
[16] T. Edrich,et al. Cardiac Output Monitoring Using Indicator-Dilution Techniques: Basics, Limits, and Perspectives , 2010, Anesthesia and analgesia.
[17] Philip J Peyton,et al. Minimally Invasive Measurement of Cardiac Output during Surgery and Critical Care: A Meta-analysis of Accuracy and Precision , 2010, Anesthesiology.
[18] L. Critchley,et al. An assessment of two Doppler-Based Monitors to Track Cardiac Output Changes in Anaesthetised Patients Undergoing Major Surgery , 2014, Anaesthesia and intensive care.
[19] Joseph Foss,et al. Comparing Methods of Clinical Measurement: Reporting Standards for Bland and Altman Analysis , 2000, Anesthesia and analgesia.
[20] A. Ho,et al. A Critical Review of the Ability of Continuous Cardiac Output Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output , 2010, Anesthesia and analgesia.
[21] A. Lee,et al. Evaluation of an uncalibrated arterial pulse contour cardiac output monitoring system in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver surgery. , 2009, British journal of anaesthesia.
[22] M. Meade,et al. Pulmonary artery catheters: Evolving rates and reasons for use* , 2011, Critical care medicine.
[23] S Wilbur,et al. Noninvasive cardiac output: simultaneous comparison of two different methods with thermodilution. , 1990, Anesthesiology.
[24] L. Critchley. Validation of the MostCare pulse contour cardiac output monitor: beyond the Bland and Altman Plot. , 2011, Anesthesia and analgesia.
[25] P. Myles,et al. Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. , 2007, British journal of anaesthesia.
[26] L. Critchley,et al. A Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Bias and Precision Statistics to Compare Cardiac Output Measurement Techniques , 1999, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.
[27] Major Upper Abdominal Surgery Alters the Calibration of Bioreactance Cardiac Output Readings, the NICOM, When Comparisons Are Made Against Suprasternal and Esophageal Doppler Intraoperatively , 2015, Anesthesia and analgesia.
[28] M. Cecconi,et al. Bench-to-bedside review: The importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies – with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output , 2009, Critical care.
[29] J. Scholz,et al. Comparing different methods of cardiac output determination: a call for consensus. , 2006, European journal of anaesthesiology.
[30] P. Peyton,et al. A meta‐analysis of the accuracy and precision of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) , 2012, Anaesthesia.
[31] L. Critchley,et al. Assessment of trending ability of cardiac output monitors by polar plot methodology. , 2011, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.