Statistics Used to Assess Monitors and Monitoring Applications

[1]  P. Barash,et al.  Comparing methods of measurement: an alternative approach. , 1990, Anesthesiology.

[2]  L. Critchley,et al.  Systematic error of cardiac output measured by bolus thermodilution with a pulmonary artery catheter compared with that measured by an aortic flow probe in a pig model. , 2013, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.

[3]  Dietmar Stöckl,et al.  Application of the Bland-Altman plot for interpretation of method-comparison studies: a critical investigation of its practice. , 2002, Clinical chemistry.

[4]  F. Michard.  Thinking outside the (cardiac output) box. , 2012, Critical care medicine.

[5]  L. Nilsson,et al.  Researcher bias and generalization of results in bias and limits of agreement analyses: a commentary based on the review of 50 Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica papers using the Altman–Bland approach , 2006, Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica.

[6]  G. Drummond,et al.  Reporting of method comparison studies: a review of advice, an assessment of current practice, and specific suggestions for future reports. , 2016, British journal of anaesthesia.

[7]  D. Altman,et al.  Agreement Between Methods of Measurement with Multiple Observations Per Individual , 2007, Journal of biopharmaceutical statistics.

[8]  S. Gottlieb,et al.  Impedance cardiography: More questions than answers , 2006, Current cardiology reports.

[9]  L. Critchley,et al.  Reliability of lithium dilution cardiac output in anaesthetized sheep. , 2013, British journal of anaesthesia.

[10]  L. Critchley.  Meta-analyses of Bland-Altman-style cardiac output validation studies: good, but do they provide answers to all our questions? , 2017, British journal of anaesthesia.

[11]  Mohammed Saeed,et al.  The cardiac output from blood pressure algorithms trial. , 2009, Critical care medicine.

[12]  G. Drummond.  Limits of Agreement With Confidence Intervals Are Necessary to Assess Comparability of Measurement Devices. , 2017, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[13]  M. Singer,et al.  Assessment of the clinical effectiveness of pulmonary artery catheters in management of patients in intensive care ( PAC-Man ) : a randomised controlled trial , 2022 .

[14]  L. Critchley.  Bias and precision statistics: should we still adhere to the 30% benchmark for cardiac output monitor validation studies? , 2011, Anesthesiology.

[15]  A. Perrino,et al.  Transtracheal Doppler cardiac output monitoring: comparison to thermodilution during noncardiac surgery. , 1994, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[16]  T. Edrich,et al.  Cardiac Output Monitoring Using Indicator-Dilution Techniques: Basics, Limits, and Perspectives , 2010, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[17]  Philip J Peyton,et al.  Minimally Invasive Measurement of Cardiac Output during Surgery and Critical Care: A Meta-analysis of Accuracy and Precision , 2010, Anesthesiology.

[18]  L. Critchley,et al.  An assessment of two Doppler-Based Monitors to Track Cardiac Output Changes in Anaesthetised Patients Undergoing Major Surgery , 2014, Anaesthesia and intensive care.

[19]  Joseph Foss,et al.  Comparing Methods of Clinical Measurement: Reporting Standards for Bland and Altman Analysis , 2000, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[20]  A. Ho,et al.  A Critical Review of the Ability of Continuous Cardiac Output Monitors to Measure Trends in Cardiac Output , 2010, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[21]  A. Lee,et al.  Evaluation of an uncalibrated arterial pulse contour cardiac output monitoring system in cirrhotic patients undergoing liver surgery. , 2009, British journal of anaesthesia.

[22]  M. Meade,et al.  Pulmonary artery catheters: Evolving rates and reasons for use* , 2011, Critical care medicine.

[23]  S Wilbur,et al.  Noninvasive cardiac output: simultaneous comparison of two different methods with thermodilution. , 1990, Anesthesiology.

[24]  L. Critchley.  Validation of the MostCare pulse contour cardiac output monitor: beyond the Bland and Altman Plot. , 2011, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[25]  P. Myles,et al.  Using the Bland-Altman method to measure agreement with repeated measures. , 2007, British journal of anaesthesia.

[26]  L. Critchley,et al.  A Meta-Analysis of Studies Using Bias and Precision Statistics to Compare Cardiac Output Measurement Techniques , 1999, Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing.

[27]  Major Upper Abdominal Surgery Alters the Calibration of Bioreactance Cardiac Output Readings, the NICOM, When Comparisons Are Made Against Suprasternal and Esophageal Doppler Intraoperatively , 2015, Anesthesia and analgesia.

[28]  M. Cecconi,et al.  Bench-to-bedside review: The importance of the precision of the reference technique in method comparison studies – with specific reference to the measurement of cardiac output , 2009, Critical care.

[29]  J. Scholz,et al.  Comparing different methods of cardiac output determination: a call for consensus. , 2006, European journal of anaesthesiology.

[30]  P. Peyton,et al.  A meta‐analysis of the accuracy and precision of the ultrasonic cardiac output monitor (USCOM) , 2012, Anaesthesia.

[31]  L. Critchley,et al.  Assessment of trending ability of cardiac output monitors by polar plot methodology. , 2011, Journal of cardiothoracic and vascular anesthesia.