A comparative study of single-dose treatment of chancroid using thiamphenicol versus Azithromycin.

A study was conducted in São Paulo, Brazil, to compare azithromycin with thiamphenicol for the single-dose treatment of chancroid. In all, 54 men with chancroid were tested. The etiology was determined by clinical characterization and direct bacterioscopy with Gram staining. None of the patients had positive serology or dark-field examination indicating active infection with Treponema pallidum. Genital infections due to Neisseria gonorrhoeae and herpes simplex virus were excluded by polymerase chain reaction testing. For 54 patients with chancroid, cure rates with single-dose treatment were 73% with azithromycin and 89% with thiamphenicol. HIV seropositivity was found to be associated with treatment failure (p=0.001). The treatment failed in all HIV positive patients treated with azithromycin (p=0.002) and this drug should be avoided in these co-infected patients. In the view of the authors, thiamphenicol is the most indicated single-dose regimen for chancroid treatment.

[1]  Y. Olumide,et al.  Chancroid and human immunodeficiency virus infection – a review , 2007, International journal of dermatology.

[2]  W. Belda,et al.  Donovanosis treated with thiamphenicol. , 2007, The Brazilian journal of infectious diseases : an official publication of the Brazilian Society of Infectious Diseases.

[3]  N. T. Annan,et al.  Treatment of chancroid in resource-poor countries , 2005, Expert review of anti-infective therapy.

[4]  D. Lewis Chancroid: clinical manifestations, diagnosis, and management , 2003, Sexually transmitted infections.

[5]  W. Belda Junior,et al.  Thiamphenicol in the treatment of chancroid. A study of 1,128 cases. , 2000, Revista do Instituto de Medicina Tropical de Sao Paulo.

[6]  D. Fleming,et al.  From epidemiological synergy to public health policy and practice: the contribution of other sexually transmitted diseases to sexual transmission of HIV infection. , 1999, Sexually transmitted infections.

[7]  H. Ye,et al.  Treatment of chancroid with azithromycin , 1996, International journal of STD & AIDS.

[8]  D. Martin,et al.  Comparison of azithromycin and ceftriaxone for the treatment of chancroid. , 1995, Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America.

[9]  D. Martin,et al.  Chancroid epidemiology in New Orleans men. , 1995, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[10]  F. Plummer,et al.  Single Dose Azithromycin for the Treatment of Chancroid: A Randomized Comparison With Erythromycin , 1994, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[11]  D. Martin,et al.  Comparison of the in vitro activities of various parenteral and oral antimicrobial agents against endemic Haemophilus ducreyi , 1993, Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy.

[12]  P. Piot,et al.  Cofactors in male-female sexual transmission of human immunodeficiency virus type 1. , 1991, The Journal of infectious diseases.

[13]  M. Vorachit,et al.  Drug resistance of Haemophilus ducreyi. , 1990, The Southeast Asian journal of tropical medicine and public health.

[14]  W. Belda,et al.  Thiamphenicol in the treatment of male gonococcal urethritis: a study of 1,230 cases. , 1984, Sexually transmitted diseases.

[15]  A. Latif Thiamphenicol in the treatment of chancroid in men. , 1982, The British journal of venereal diseases.

[16]  A. Ronald,et al.  Epidemiologic, clinical, laboratory, and therapeutic features of an urban outbreak of chancroid in North America. , 1980, Reviews of infectious diseases.