Shared components of protein complexes--versatile building blocks or biochemical artefacts?

Protein complexes perform many important functions in the cell. Large-scale studies of protein-protein interactions have not only revealed new complexes but have also placed many proteins into multiple complexes. Whilst the advocates of hypothesis-free research touted the discovery of these shared components as new links between diverse cellular processes, critical commentators denounced many of the findings as artefacts, thus questioning the usefulness of large-scale approaches. Here, we survey proteins known to be shared between complexes, as established in the literature, and compare them to shared components found in high-throughput screens. We discuss the various challenges to the identification and functional interpretation of bona fide shared components, namely contaminants, variant and megacomplexes, and transient interactions, and suggest that many of the novel shared components found in high-throughput screens are neither the results of contamination nor central components, but appear to be primarily regulatory links in cellular processes.

[1]  Arun K. Ramani,et al.  Protein interaction networks from yeast to human. , 2004, Current opinion in structural biology.

[2]  A. Nohe,et al.  Analyzing for co-localization of proteins at a cell membrane. , 2004, Current Pharmaceutical Biotechnology.

[3]  P. Bork,et al.  Structure-Based Assembly of Protein Complexes in Yeast , 2004, Science.

[4]  Andrew J Link,et al.  A Protein Complex Containing the Conserved Swi2/Snf2-Related ATPase Swr1p Deposits Histone Variant H2A.Z into Euchromatin , 2004, PLoS biology.

[5]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Global Mapping of the Yeast Genetic Interaction Network , 2004, Science.

[6]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  Conservation of protein-protein interactions - lessons from ascomycota. , 2004, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[7]  Christopher M Dobson,et al.  Principles of protein folding, misfolding and aggregation. , 2004, Seminars in cell & developmental biology.

[8]  T. Hughes,et al.  High-definition macromolecular composition of yeast RNA-processing complexes. , 2004, Molecular cell.

[9]  S. L. Wong,et al.  A Map of the Interactome Network of the Metazoan C. elegans , 2004, Science.

[10]  Wei-Hua Wu,et al.  ATP-Driven Exchange of Histone H2AZ Variant Catalyzed by SWR1 Chromatin Remodeling Complex , 2004, Science.

[11]  Oreto Antúnez,et al.  Sus1, a Functional Component of the SAGA Histone Acetylase Complex and the Nuclear Pore-Associated mRNA Export Machinery , 2004, Cell.

[12]  Mark Gerstein,et al.  Bridging structural biology and genomics: assessing protein interaction data with known complexes. , 2002, Drug discovery today.

[13]  Peer Bork,et al.  SMART 4.0: towards genomic data integration , 2004, Nucleic Acids Res..

[14]  James R. Knight,et al.  A Protein Interaction Map of Drosophila melanogaster , 2003, Science.

[15]  M. Samanta,et al.  Predicting protein functions from redundancies in large-scale protein interaction networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[16]  E. O’Shea,et al.  Global analysis of protein expression in yeast , 2003, Nature.

[17]  Christian von Mering,et al.  A comprehensive set of protein complexes in yeast: mining large scale protein-protein interaction screens , 2003, Bioinform..

[18]  L. Mirny,et al.  Protein complexes and functional modules in molecular networks , 2003, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[19]  Constance J Jeffery,et al.  Moonlighting proteins: old proteins learning new tricks. , 2003, Trends in genetics : TIG.

[20]  Sandor Vajda,et al.  CAPRI: A Critical Assessment of PRedicted Interactions , 2003, Proteins.

[21]  H. Szerlong,et al.  The nuclear actin‐related proteins Arp7 and Arp9: a dimeric module that cooperates with architectural proteins for chromatin remodeling , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[22]  C. Chothia,et al.  Evolution of the Protein Repertoire , 2003, Science.

[23]  Joël Janin,et al.  Genome-wide studies of protein-protein interaction. , 2003, Current opinion in structural biology.

[24]  S. Saccani,et al.  Modulation of NF-κB Activity by Exchange of Dimers , 2003 .

[25]  Alessandro Vespignani,et al.  Global protein function prediction from protein-protein interaction networks , 2003, Nature Biotechnology.

[26]  Shmuel Sattath,et al.  How reliable are experimental protein-protein interaction data? , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[27]  B. Snel,et al.  Function prediction and protein networks. , 2003, Current opinion in cell biology.

[28]  R. Overbeek,et al.  Missing genes in metabolic pathways: a comparative genomics approach. , 2003, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[29]  E. Petfalski,et al.  The path from nucleolar 90S to cytoplasmic 40S pre‐ribosomes , 2003, The EMBO journal.

[30]  R. Aebersold,et al.  Mass spectrometry-based proteomics , 2003, Nature.

[31]  Ruedi Aebersold,et al.  The study of macromolecular complexes by quantitative proteomics , 2003, Nature Genetics.

[32]  J. Yates,et al.  Dual Roles for Spt5 in Pre-mRNA Processing and Transcription Elongation Revealed by Identification of Spt5-Associated Proteins , 2003, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[33]  Giulio Superti-Furga,et al.  Protein complexes and proteome organization from yeast to man. , 2003, Current opinion in chemical biology.

[34]  C. Peterson,et al.  Structural analysis of the yeast SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complex , 2003, Nature Structural Biology.

[35]  J. Thornton,et al.  Structural characterisation and functional significance of transient protein-protein interactions. , 2003, Journal of molecular biology.

[36]  Ting Chen,et al.  Assessment of the reliability of protein-protein interactions and protein function prediction , 2002, Pacific Symposium on Biocomputing.

[37]  S. Saccani,et al.  Modulation of NF-kappaB activity by exchange of dimers. , 2003, Molecular cell.

[38]  Gary D. Bader,et al.  An automated method for finding molecular complexes in large protein interaction networks , 2003, BMC Bioinformatics.

[39]  Eugene V Koonin,et al.  No simple dependence between protein evolution rate and the number of protein-protein interactions: only the most prolific interactors tend to evolve slowly , 2003, BMC Evolutionary Biology.

[40]  John R. Yates,et al.  The Novel SLIK Histone Acetyltransferase Complex Functions in the Yeast Retrograde Response Pathway , 2002, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[41]  Patrick Aloy,et al.  The third dimension for protein interactions and complexes. , 2002, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[42]  S. Teichmann The constraints protein-protein interactions place on sequence divergence. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[43]  T. Misteli,et al.  A Kinetic Framework for a Mammalian RNA Polymerase in Vivo , 2002, Science.

[44]  Matthew S. Gentry,et al.  Localization of Saccharomyces cerevisiae protein phosphatase 2A subunits throughout mitotic cell cycle. , 2002, Molecular biology of the cell.

[45]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Analyzing yeast protein–protein interaction data obtained from different sources , 2002, Nature Biotechnology.

[46]  Dieter A Wolf,et al.  Conservation of the COP9/signalosome in budding yeast , 2002, BMC Genetics.

[47]  Yoshihiro Yamaguchi,et al.  Roles for the Two-hybrid System in Exploration of the Yeast Protein Interactome* , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[48]  Bernhard Kuster,et al.  90S pre-ribosomes include the 35S pre-rRNA, the U3 snoRNP, and 40S subunit processing factors but predominantly lack 60S synthesis factors. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[49]  J. Shabanowitz,et al.  A large nucleolar U3 ribonucleoprotein required for 18S ribosomal RNA biogenesis , 2002, Nature.

[50]  P. Herrero,et al.  Mediator factor Med8p interacts with the hexokinase 2: implication in the glucose signalling pathway of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2002, Journal of molecular biology.

[51]  B. Snel,et al.  Comparative assessment of large-scale data sets of protein–protein interactions , 2002, Nature.

[52]  K. Sneppen,et al.  Specificity and Stability in Topology of Protein Networks , 2002, Science.

[53]  M. Yukawa,et al.  Functional differences between RSC1 and RSC2, components of a for growth essential chromatin-remodeling complex of Saccharomyces cerevisiae, during the sporulation process. , 2002, FEMS yeast research.

[54]  P. Kemmeren,et al.  Protein interaction verification and functional annotation by integrated analysis of genome-scale data. , 2002, Molecular cell.

[55]  A. E. Hirsh,et al.  Evolutionary Rate in the Protein Interaction Network , 2002, Science.

[56]  T. Maniatis,et al.  An extensive network of coupling among gene expression machines , 2002, Nature.

[57]  Gideon Schreiber,et al.  Kinetic studies of protein-protein interactions. , 2002, Current opinion in structural biology.

[58]  P. Bork,et al.  Functional organization of the yeast proteome by systematic analysis of protein complexes , 2002, Nature.

[59]  Gary D Bader,et al.  Systematic identification of protein complexes in Saccharomyces cerevisiae by mass spectrometry , 2002, Nature.

[60]  J. Yates,et al.  Charting the Protein Complexome in Yeast by Mass Spectrometry* , 2002, Molecular & Cellular Proteomics.

[61]  Samara L. Reck-Peterson,et al.  Nuclear actin and actin-related proteins in chromatin remodeling. , 2002, Annual review of biochemistry.

[62]  M. Gerstein,et al.  Relating whole-genome expression data with protein-protein interactions. , 2002, Genome research.

[63]  Noa Reis,et al.  Subunit interaction maps for the regulatory particle of the 26S proteasome and the COP9 signalosome , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[64]  Rein Aasland,et al.  The Saccharomyces cerevisiae Set1 complex includes an Ash2 homologue and methylates histone 3 lysine 4 , 2001, The EMBO journal.

[65]  G. Church,et al.  Correlation between transcriptome and interactome mapping data from Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2001, Nature Genetics.

[66]  Nevan J. Krogan,et al.  COMPASS: A complex of proteins associated with a trithorax-related SET domain protein , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[67]  A. Wagner The yeast protein interaction network evolves rapidly and contains few redundant duplicate genes. , 2001, Molecular biology and evolution.

[68]  A. Barabasi,et al.  Lethality and centrality in protein networks , 2001, Nature.

[69]  P. Cramer,et al.  Structural Basis of Transcription: RNA Polymerase II at 2.8 Ångstrom Resolution , 2001, Science.

[70]  R. Ozawa,et al.  A comprehensive two-hybrid analysis to explore the yeast protein interactome , 2001, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[71]  William Arbuthnot Sir Lane,et al.  The Yeast NuA4 and Drosophila MSL Complexes Contain Homologous Subunits Important for Transcription Regulation* , 2001, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[72]  R. Kornberg,et al.  Structural organization of yeast and mammalian mediator complexes. , 2000, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[73]  R. Singer,et al.  The odyssey of a regulated transcript. , 2000, RNA.

[74]  J. Yates,et al.  Proteasomal proteomics: identification of nucleotide-sensitive proteasome-interacting proteins by mass spectrometric analysis of affinity-purified proteasomes. , 2000, Molecular biology of the cell.

[75]  Ali Hamiche,et al.  A chromatin remodelling complex involved in transcription and DNA processing , 2000, Nature.

[76]  C. Peterson,et al.  Actin-related proteins (Arps): conformational switches for chromatin-remodeling machines? , 2000, BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology.

[77]  E. Marcotte,et al.  Computational genetics: finding protein function by nonhomology methods. , 2000, Current opinion in structural biology.

[78]  M. Ashburner,et al.  Gene Ontology: tool for the unification of biology , 2000, Nature Genetics.

[79]  P. Cramer,et al.  Architecture of RNA polymerase II and implications for the transcription mechanism. , 2000, Science.

[80]  Bertrand Séraphin,et al.  A Sm‐like protein complex that participates in mRNA degradation , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[81]  James R. Knight,et al.  A comprehensive analysis of protein–protein interactions in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2000, Nature.

[82]  B. Cairns,et al.  Two functionally distinct forms of the RSC nucleosome-remodeling complex, containing essential AT hook, BAH, and bromodomains. , 1999, Molecular cell.

[83]  B. Séraphin,et al.  A generic protein purification method for protein complex characterization and proteome exploration , 1999, Nature Biotechnology.

[84]  A. Brown,et al.  Transcription factor GCN4 for control of amino acid biosynthesis also regulates the expression of the gene for lipoamide dehydrogenase. , 1999, The Biochemical journal.

[85]  S. Gygi,et al.  Correlation between Protein and mRNA Abundance in Yeast , 1999, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[86]  Dmitrij Frishman,et al.  MIPS: a database for genomes and protein sequences , 1999, Nucleic Acids Res..

[87]  Stefan Hohmann,et al.  Composition and Functional Analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Trehalose Synthase Complex* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[88]  T. Yamashita,et al.  RMP, a Novel RNA Polymerase II Subunit 5-Interacting Protein, Counteracts Transactivation by Hepatitis B Virus X Protein , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[89]  Michael R. Green,et al.  Dissecting the Regulatory Circuitry of a Eukaryotic Genome , 1998, Cell.

[90]  B. Cairns,et al.  Two actin-related proteins are shared functional components of the chromatin-remodeling complexes RSC and SWI/SNF. , 1998, Molecular cell.

[91]  A. Klinder,et al.  Assembly of phosphofructokinase‐1 from Saccharomyces cerevisiae in extracts of single‐deletion mutants , 1998, Yeast.

[92]  B. Alberts The Cell as a Collection of Protein Machines: Preparing the Next Generation of Molecular Biologists , 1998, Cell.

[93]  J. Kovács,et al.  Characterization of microtubule-phosphofructokinase complex: specific effects of MgATP and vinblastine. , 1997, Biochemistry.

[94]  I. Wool Extraribosomal functions of ribosomal proteins. , 1996, Trends in biochemical sciences.

[95]  D. Sinclair,et al.  Genetics of the synthesis of serine from glycine and the utilization of glycine as sole nitrogen source by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 1995, Genetics.

[96]  R. Kornberg,et al.  TFIIF-TAF-RNA polymerase II connection. , 1994, Genes & development.

[97]  J. Ovádi,et al.  Interaction of phosphofructokinase with tubulin and microtubules. Quantitative evaluation of the mutual effects. , 1993, The Journal of biological chemistry.

[98]  J. Ovádi,et al.  Enzyme‐enzyme interactions and their metabolic role , 1990, FEBS letters.

[99]  S. Fields,et al.  A novel genetic system to detect protein–protein interactions , 1989, Nature.