The Use of Passives and Impersonal Style in Civil Engineering Writing

Claims abound about passives and the impersonal style they create. Few studies, however, check the claims with a large, systematic analysis of texts from either academia or industry. Motivated by the need to teach effective workplace writing skills to undergraduate engineering students, this study investigates the use of passives and associated impersonal style features in 170 practitioner reports, journal articles, and student reports from civil engineering. Using multidimensional analysis (a technique from corpus linguistics) and interviews of practitioners, students, and faculty, the study found that, as expected, engineering texts, compared to nontechnical texts, have a frequent use of impersonal style features; however, they use passives for a wider range of functions than is typically described in technical writing literature. Furthermore, compared to the journal articles and student reports, the practitioner reports use significantly fewer features of impersonal style. The findings inform teaching materials that present a more realistically complex picture of the language structures and functions important for civil engineering practice.

[1]  Bradford R. Connatser.  Reconsidering Some Prescriptive Rules of Grammar and Composition , 2004 .

[2]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Should we use characteristics of conversation to measure grammatical complexity in L2 writing development , 2011 .

[3]  Leong Ping Alvin.  The passive voice in scientific writing. The current norm in science journals , 2014 .

[4]  P. M. Berthouex.  Honing the Writing Skills of Engineers , 1996 .

[5]  B. Budgell,et al.  ‘Use the active voice whenever possible’: The Impact of Style Guidelines in Medical Journals , 2013 .

[6]  Susan Conrad,et al.  Preparing Students for Writing in Civil Engineering Practice , 2012 .

[7]  S. E. Chen,et al.  SLSE Damage Detection Technique for Foundation Strengthening Using Plates , 2011 .

[8]  Daniel D. Ding.  The Passive Voice and Social Values in Science , 2002 .

[9]  Hilary Nesi,et al.  Genres across the Disciplines: Student Writing in Higher Education , 2012 .

[10]  Joel P. Conte,et al.  Three-Dimensional Seismic Response of Humboldt Bay Bridge-Foundation-Ground System , 2008 .

[11]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Variation across speech and writing: Methodology , 1988 .

[12]  Keith B. Riggle.  Using the Active and Passive Voice Appropriately in On-the-Job Writing , 1998 .

[13]  Daniel Kies.  Some Stylistic Features of Business and Technical Writing: The Functions of Passive Voice, Nominalization, and Agency , 1985 .

[14]  Joanna Wolfe,et al.  How Technical Communication Textbooks Fail Engineering Students , 2009 .

[15]  Michael Alley,et al.  Why industry says that engineering graduates have poor communication skills: What the literature says , 2011 .

[16]  K. Riley.  Passive Voice and Rhetorical Role in Scientific Writing , 1991 .

[17]  M. Bloor,et al.  The Functional Analysis of English : A Hallidayan Approach , 1998 .

[18]  Xudong Jia,et al.  Rethinking Geometric Design Standards for Bike Paths , 2007 .

[19]  Laura Reave,et al.  Technical Communication Instruction in Engineering Schools , 2004 .

[20]  A. M. Wilkinson.  Jargon and the Passive Voice: Prescriptions and Proscriptions for Scientific Writing , 1992 .

[21]  David Ingre.  Engineering communication : a practical guide to workplace communications for engineers , 2008 .

[22]  Caren Wakerman Converse.  Unpoetic Justice , 2012 .

[23]  Barbara Couture,et al.  Categorizing Professional Discourse , 1992 .

[24]  Chapter 4.1 Expanding Multi-Dimensional analysis with qualitative research techniques , 2014 .

[25]  David F. Beer,et al.  A guide to writing as an engineer , 1996 .

[26]  Michael Halliday,et al.  An Introduction to Functional Grammar , 1985 .

[27]  Daniel Ding.  Object-centered—How Engineering Writing Embodies Objects: A Study of Four Engineering Documents , 2001 .

[28]  飯島 周.  「会話の文法」に関する一考察 : Longman Grammar of Spoken and Written Englishの場合 , 1999 .

[29]  Maren Henry,et al.  Rhetoric Of Grammar For Engineers: Developing A Wac (Writing Across The Curriculum) Workshop For Engineering Technology Students , 2008 .

[30]  Alan W Gross,et al.  Scientific Discourse in Sociohistorical Context: The Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, 1675-1975. Dwight Atkinson , 2001 .

[31]  Elena Seoane,et al.  Syntactic complexity, discourse status and animacy as determinants of grammatical variation in Modern English1 , 2009, English Language and Linguistics.

[32]  Megan Elberts.  AMERICAN SOCIETY OF CIVIL ENGINEERS. , 1937, Science.

[33]  Heidrun Dorgeloh,et al.  The Limits of Variation in Scientific Abstracts – Syntactic and Functional Constraints , 2004 .

[34]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Fear and loathing of the English passive , 2014 .

[35]  Robert A. Day.  Scientific English: A Guide for Scientists and Other Professionals , 1992 .

[36]  Diana Patterson.  Technical writing , 1976, ASTR.

[37]  Susan Conrad.  Investigating academic texts with corpus-based techniques: An example from biology☆ , 1996 .

[38]  Douglas Biber,et al.  Intra-textual variation within medical research articles , 2014 .

[39]  Karl E. Gwiasda.  Of Classrooms and Contexts: Teaching Engineers to Write Wrong , 1984, IEEE Transactions on Education.

[40]  Isaac A. Jeldes,et al.  The Low Compaction Grading Technique on Steep Reclaimed Slopes: Soil Characterization and Static Slope Stability , 2013, Geotechnical and Geological Engineering.

[41]  Mauro Sobhie,et al.  Working with discourse: meaning beyond the clause , 2004 .

[42]  Susan Conrad.  The Cambridge Handbook of English Corpus Linguistics: Register variation , 2015 .

[43]  T. Spector,et al.  Writing a Scientific Manuscript: Highlights for Success , 1994 .

[44]  Ann M. Blakeslee.  Bridging the Workplace and the Academy: Teaching Professional Genres through Classroom-Workplace Collaborations , 2001 .

[45]  Joanna Wolfe,et al.  Teaching the IMRaD Genre: Sentence Combining and Pattern Practice Revisited , 2011 .

[46]  Heather Silyn-Roberts.  Professional Communications: A Handbook for Civil Engineers , 2004 .

[47]  Bernard McKenna.  How Engineers Write: An Empirical Study of Engineering Report Writing , 1997 .

[48]  Susan Conrad,et al.  Students Writing for Professional Practice: A Model for Collaboration Among Faculty, Practitioners, and Writing Specialists , 2015 .

[49]  Susan Conrad,et al.  Real Grammar: A Corpus-Based Approach to English , 2009 .

[50]  Susan Conrad,et al.  A Comparison of Practitioner and Student Writing in Civil Engineering , 2017 .

[51]  Marin S. Robinson.  Write like a chemist : a guide and resource , 2008 .

[52]  Jean Parkinson,et al.  Development of noun phrase complexity in the writing of English for Academic Purposes students , 2014 .

[53]  Carol J. Romanowski,et al.  A Message from Recent Engineering Graduates in the Workplace: Results of a Survey on Technical Communication Skills , 2001 .

[54]  Susan Conrad,et al.  Multi-dimensional methodology and the dimensions of register variation in English , 2014 .