Issues Mapping: A problem structuring method for addressing science and technology conflicts

There are new opportunities for the application of problem structuring methods to address science and technology risk conflicts through stakeholder dialogue. Most previous approaches to addressing risk conflicts have been developed from a traditional risk communication perspective, which tends to construct engagement between stakeholders based on the assumption that scientists evaluate technologies using facts, and lay participants do so based on their values. ‘Understanding the facts’ is generally privileged, so the value framings of experts often remain unexposed, and the perspectives of lay participants are marginalized. When this happens, risk communication methodologies fail to achieve authentic dialogue and can exacerbate conflict. This paper introduces ‘Issues Mapping’, a problem structuring method that enables dialogue by using visual modelling techniques to clarify issues and develop mutual understanding between stakeholders. A case study of the first application of Issues Mapping is presented, which engaged science and community protagonists in the genetic engineering debate in New Zealand. Participant and researcher evaluations suggest that Issues Mapping helped to break down stereotypes of both scientists and environmental activists; increased mutual understanding; reduced conflict; identified common ground; started building trust; and supported the emergence of policy options that all stakeholders in the room could live with. The paper ends with some reflections and priorities for further research.

[1]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology in Action , 1990 .

[2]  Guy Cook,et al.  ‘The Scientists Think and the Public Feels’: Expert Perceptions of the Discourse of GM Food , 2004 .

[3]  H. Rittel,et al.  Dilemmas in a general theory of planning , 1973 .

[4]  B. Wynne,et al.  Misunderstanding science? : the public reconstruction of science and technology , 1996 .

[5]  S. Cummings,et al.  Foucault Plays Habermas: An Alternative Philosophical Underpinning for Critical Systems Thinking , 1996 .

[6]  Andy Bilson,et al.  Guidelines for a constructivist approach: Steps toward the adaptation of ideas from family therapy for use in organizations , 1997 .

[7]  Will Allen,et al.  From 'dialogue' to 'engagement'? Learning beyond cases , 2005 .

[8]  H. Maturana.  The tree of knowledge , 1987 .

[9]  Walter B. Weimer.  Notes on the methodology of scientific research , 1979 .

[10]  B. Fischhoff,et al.  Risk Communication: A Mental Models Approach , 2001 .

[11]  L. White,et al.  Evaluating problem-structuring methods: developing an approach to show the value and effectiveness of PSMs , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[12]  R. Keeney,et al.  Improving risk communication. , 1986, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[13]  S. French.  Planning under Pressure: The Strategic Choice Approach , 1988 .

[14]  N. Pidgeon,et al.  Opening up nanotechnology dialogue with the publics: Risk communication or ‘upstream engagement’? , 2007 .

[15]  W. Leiss.  Three Phases in the Evolution of Risk Communication Practice , 1996 .

[16]  Karen Cronin,et al.  The privatization of public talk: a New Zealand case study on the use of dialogue for civic engagement in biotechnology governance , 2008 .

[17]  Gerald Midgley,et al.  The sacred and profane in critical systems thinking , 1992 .

[18]  Robert Doubleday,et al.  The Laboratory Revisited , 2007 .

[19]  R. Mason.  Challenging strategic planning assumptions , 1981 .

[20]  C. Eden,et al.  Making Strategy: The Journey of Strategic Management , 1998 .

[21]  Margaret Stebbing,et al.  Avoiding the Trust Deficit: Public Engagement, Values, the Precautionary Principle and the Future of Nanotechnology , 2009 .

[22]  Mark Lawrence McPhail,et al.  Race and the (Im)Possibility of Dialogue , 2004 .

[23]  Michael Jackson,et al.  Present positions and future prospects in management science , 1987 .

[24]  John Mingers,et al.  Soft OR comes of age—but not everywhere! , 2011 .

[25]  G. Midgley.  Systemic Intervention: Philosophy, Methodology, and Practice , 2000 .

[26]  Ortwin Renn.  White Paper on Risk Governance: Towards and Integrative Approach , 2009 .

[27]  W. Liu,et al.  Using SSM to structure the identification of inputs and outputs in DEA , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[28]  B Wynne.  Expert discourses of risk and ethics on genetically manipulated organisms: the weaving of public alienation. , 2001, Notizie di Politeia.

[29]  Leslie P. Steffe,et al.  Reconstructing the concept of knowledge , 2007 .

[30]  J. Habermas.  Communication and the Evolution of Society , 1979 .

[31]  M. C. Jackson,et al.  Beyond problem structuring methods: reinventing the future of OR/MS , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[32]  P Duignan,et al.  Evaluating community development programs for health promotion: problems illustrated by a New Zealand example. , 1989, Community health studies.

[33]  Laurie Skuba Jackson.  Contemporary Public Involvement: Toward a strategic approach , 2001 .

[34]  Jamie K. Wardman,et al.  The Constitution of Risk Communication in Advanced Liberal Societies , 2008, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[35]  G Midgley,et al.  The theory and practice of boundary critique: developing housing services for older people , 1998, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[36]  C. Eden,et al.  On the nature of problems in consulting practice , 1979 .

[37]  Linda Smith,et al.  Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples , 2000 .

[38]  J Pollack,et al.  Multimethodology in series and parallel: strategic planning using hard and soft OR , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[39]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Past, present and future of problem structuring methods , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[40]  Ion Georgiou,et al.  Messing about in transformations: Structured systemic planning for systemic solutions to systemic problems , 2012, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[41]  H. L. Ong,et al.  A modified tabu search algorithm for cost-based job shop problem , 2010, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[42]  Ernst von Glasersfeld,et al.  Reconstructing the Concept of Knowledge , 1985 .

[43]  G. Rowe,et al.  Evaluating Public-Participation Exercises: A Research Agenda , 2004 .

[44]  Gerald Midgley,et al.  Boundary critique and its implications for conflict prevention , 2011, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[45]  Peter Checkland,et al.  Soft Systems Methodology , 2020, Systems Approaches to Making Change: A Practical Guide.

[46]  L. Franco,et al.  Understanding multi-methodology: Evaluating the perceived impact of mixing methods for group budgetary decisions , 2011 .

[47]  M. Foucault,et al.  Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977 , 1980 .

[48]  José Soeiro Ferreira,et al.  Multimethodology in Metaheuristics , 2013, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[49]  Nancy J. Obermeyer,et al.  The Evolution of Public Participation GIS , 1998 .

[50]  R. Fisher,et al.  Getting to Yes: Negotiating Agreement Without Giving in , 1981 .

[51]  J. Hunt,et al.  RISCOM II Deliverable 4 . 10 Developing Participatory Consultation – a review of learning from four experimental dialogue processes August 2003 , 2003 .

[52]  José-Rodrigo Córdoba-Pachón,et al.  Broadening the boundaries: an application of critical systems thinking to IS planning in Colombia , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[53]  Robert Y. Cavana,et al.  Towards a new framework for evaluating systemic problem structuring methods , 2013, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[54]  Gerald Midgley,et al.  Systemic intervention for community OR: Developing services with young people (under 16) living on the streets , 2004 .

[55]  H. Maturana,et al.  The Tree of Knowledge: The Biological Roots of Human Understanding , 2007 .

[56]  John Mingers,et al.  Critical Heuristics of Social Planning: A New Approach to Practical Philosophy , 1983 .

[57]  G. Kreweras.  Creating the corporate future: Russell L. ACKOFF Wiley, New York, 1981, xi + 297 pages, £10.85 , 1982 .

[58]  George P. Richardson,et al.  Integrating modes of policy analysis and strategic management practice: requisite elements and dilemmas , 2009, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[59]  John Mingers,et al.  Multimethodology : the theory and practice of combining management science methodologies , 1997 .

[60]  A. Damasio.  The Feeling of What Happens: Body and Emotion in the Making of Consciousness , 1999 .

[61]  Melissa L. Finucane,et al.  Risk as Analysis and Risk as Feelings: Some Thoughts about Affect, Reason, Risk, and Rationality , 2004, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[62]  Carol Becker,et al.  From diatribe to dialogue on divisive public issues: Approaches drawn from family therapy , 1996 .

[63]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  A New Approach to Risk Evaluation and Management: Risk‐Based, Precaution‐Based, and Discourse‐Based Strategies 1 , 2002, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[64]  Yoshinori Nakagawa,et al.  Assessment of social implications of nanotechnologies in Japan: Application of problem structuring method based on interview surveys and cognitive maps , 2010 .

[65]  C. Churchman.  Operations Research as a Profession , 1970 .

[66]  Wendy Gregory,et al.  Critical systems thinking and pluralism : a new constellation , 1992 .

[67]  G. Midgley.  Dealing with coercion: Critical Systems Heuristics and beyond , 1997 .

[68]  Fred Wenstøp,et al.  On operations research and value conflicts , 2009 .

[69]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Where next for problem structuring methods , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[70]  L. Alberto Franco,et al.  Forms of conversation and problem structuring methods: a conceptual development , 2006, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[71]  Kyoichi Kijima,et al.  An enriched soft systems methodology (SSM) and its application to cultural conflict under a paternalistic value system , 1994 .

[72]  Fran Ackermann,et al.  Mixing OR methods in practice: Past, present and future directions , 2011, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[73]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Problem structuring methods in action , 2004, Eur. J. Oper. Res..

[74]  N.A.D. Connell,et al.  Evaluating soft OR: some reflections on an apparently ‘unsuccessful’ implementation using a Soft Systems Methodology (SSM) based approach , 2001, J. Oper. Res. Soc..

[75]  David L. Cooperrider,et al.  Appreciative inquiry handbook : the first in a series of AI workbooks for leaders of change , 2005 .

[76]  Ortwin Renn.  The role of risk communication and public dialogue for improving risk management , 1998 .

[77]  A. Damasio.  Descartes' error: emotion, reason, and the human brain. avon books , 1994 .

[78]  Jonathan Rosenhead,et al.  Rational Analysis for a Problematic World Revisited , 2001 .

[79]  R. Sieber.  Public Participation Geographic Information Systems: A Literature Review and Framework , 2006 .

[80]  Robert L. Flood.  Liberating Systems Theory , 1990 .

[81]  Frank Galuszka.  The 'cybernetics' of Cybernetics and the 'cybernetics of Cybernetics' , 2003, Cybern. Hum. Knowing.

[82]  Jason Chilvers,et al.  Upping the ante: A conceptual framework for designing and evaluating participatory technology assessments , 2006 .

[83]  B Fischhoff,et al.  Risk perception and communication unplugged: twenty years of process. , 1995, Risk analysis : an official publication of the Society for Risk Analysis.

[84]  H. Maturana.  Reality: The Search for Objectivity or the Quest for a Compelling Argument , 1988 .

[85]  Peter Checkland,et al.  From Optimizing to Learning: A Development of Systems Thinking for the 1990s , 1985 .

[86]  David Wood,et al.  Towards a New Framework for Evaluating Participative and Systemic Methods , 2009 .

[87]  Deborah Tannen,et al.  The Argument Culture: Stopping America's War of Words , 1998 .

[88]  Ortwin Renn,et al.  Perception of risks. , 2004, Toxicology letters.

[89]  M. Jackson,et al.  New Directions in Management Science , 1987 .

[90]  M. Buber,et al.  I and Thou , 1923 .