Learning, Imitation, and the Use of Knowledge: A Comparison of Markets, Hierarchies, and Teams

We use computer simulation to study how different allocations of decision rights give rise to different organizational abilities to maintain and act upon accurate maps of a changing environment. We compare the performance of three archetypal organizational forms as we vary the dynamism and complexity of the environment and the rates at which individuals can observe the environment and imitate each other. We find that teams in which actions are based on plurality votes excel when the task is relatively easy—that is, the ability of individual members to observe the environment is high compared to the environment's dynamism and size. Markets in which all agents act independently perform well when the task is difficult and the agents can easily imitate each other. Hierarchies in which agents in the upper echelons impose actions on their subordinates outperform the other two forms when the agents' abilities to observe the environment are heterogeneous, the task is difficult, and imitation among the agents is moderate. The analysis has implications for the relationship between centralization and the notions of exploitation and exploration in March's influential work [March JG (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organ. Sci. 2(1):71–87].

[1]  J. Stiglitz,et al.  The Architecture of Economic Systems: Hierarchies and Polyarchies , 1984 .

[2]  W. Dugger.  The Economic Institutions of Capitalism , 1987 .

[3]  Jack A. Nickerson,et al.  A Knowledge-based Theory of the Firm - A Problem-solving Perspective , 2004, Organ. Sci..

[4]  S. Page,et al.  Political Institutions and Sorting in a Tiebout Model , 1997 .

[5]  Jeffrey Pfeffer,et al.  Valuing Internal vs. External Knowledge: Explaining the Preference for Outsiders , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[6]  Kyle J. Mayer,et al.  Contract design as a firm capability: An integration of learning and transaction cost perspectives , 2007 .

[7]  Stuart A. Kauffman,et al.  The origins of order , 1993 .

[8]  Jack A. Nickerson,et al.  Being Efficiently Fickle: A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Choice , 2002, Organ. Sci..

[9]  Marco Iansiti,et al.  Special Issue: Organizational Design: Organization Design and Effectiveness over the Innovation Life Cycle , 2006, Organ. Sci..

[10]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Balancing Search and Stability: Interdependencies Among Elements of Organizational Design , 2003, Manag. Sci..

[11]  Kathleen M. Carley,et al.  A Theoretical Study of Organizational Performance Under Information Distortion , 1997 .

[12]  I. Nonaka.  A Dynamic Theory of Organizational Knowledge Creation , 1994 .

[13]  J. Barney.  Asset stocks and sustained competitive advantage: a comment , 1989 .

[14]  B. Kogut,et al.  What Firms Do? Coordination, Identity, and Learning , 1996 .

[15]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  Speed and Search: Designing Organizations for Turbulence and Complexity , 2005, Organ. Sci..

[16]  P. Schoemaker,et al.  Strategic assets and organizational rent , 1993 .

[17]  K. Weick,et al.  Collective mind in organizations: Heedful interrelating on flight decks. , 1993 .

[18]  Henry Mintzberg.  Musings on management. Ten ideas designed to rile everyone who cares about management. , 1996, Harvard business review.

[19]  J. Birkinshaw,et al.  Strategies for Managing Internal Competition , 2001, IEEE Engineering Management Review.

[20]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge and the Speed of the Transfer and Imitation of Organizational Capabilities: An Empirical Test , 1995 .

[21]  Paul Milgrom,et al.  Informational Asymmetries, Strategic Behavior, and Industrial Organization , 1987 .

[22]  Richard Makadok.  Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creation , 2001 .

[23]  S. G. Cohen,et al.  What Makes Teams Work: Group Effectiveness Research from the Shop Floor to the Executive Suite , 1997 .

[24]  Jeffrey H. Dyer,et al.  Human capital and learning as a source of sustainable competitive advantage , 2004 .

[25]  Mary J. Benner,et al.  Exploitation, Exploration, and Process Management: The Productivity Dilemma Revisited , 2003 .

[26]  B. Kogut,et al.  Knowledge of the Firm, Combinative Capabilities, and the Replication of Technology , 1992 .

[27]  Daniel A. Levinthal.  Adaptation on rugged landscapes , 1997 .

[28]  O. Williamson,et al.  Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications. , 1977 .

[29]  Karel Cool,et al.  Asset stock accumulation and sustainability of competitive advantage , 1989 .

[30]  R. Radner.  The organization of decentralized information processing , 1993 .

[31]  Michael L. Tushman,et al.  Information Processing as an Integrating Concept in Organizational Design. , 1978 .

[32]  M. Polanyi,et al.  Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[33]  Anne Marie Knott,et al.  The Dynamic Value of Hierarchy , 2001, Manag. Sci..

[34]  David A. Harrison,et al.  Structured Conflict and Consensus Outcomes in Group Decision Making , 1995 .

[35]  J. Barney.  Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy , 1986 .

[36]  Jan W. Rivkin,et al.  WHEN EXPLORATION BACKFIRES: UNINTENDED CONSEQUENCES OF MULTILEVEL ORGANIZATIONAL SEARCH , 2006 .

[37]  Ranjay Gulati,et al.  Renewal Through Reorganization: The Value of Inconsistencies between Formal and Informal Organization , 2009, Organ. Sci..

[38]  Douglas J. Miller,et al.  An empirical examination of transaction- and firm-level influences on the vertical boundaries of the firm , 2003 .

[39]  S. Winter,et al.  The Co-evolution of Capabilities and Transaction Costs: Explaining the Institutional Structure of Production , 2005 .

[40]  Ken G. Smith,et al.  The interplay between exploration and exploitation. , 2006 .

[41]  Roger J. Calantone,et al.  Adding Interpersonal Learning and Tacit Knowledge to March's Exploration-Exploitation Model , 2006 .

[42]  P. Lawrence,et al.  Organization and environment , 1967 .

[43]  M. Porter.  What is strategy , 2000 .

[44]  Linda Argote,et al.  An Empirical Investigation of the Microstructure of Knowledge Acquisition and Transfer Through Learning by Doing , 1996, Oper. Res..

[45]  Daniel A. Levinthal,et al.  Temporarily Divide to Conquer: Centralized, Decentralized, and Reintegrated Organizational Approaches to Exploration and Adaptation , 2003 .

[46]  J. March.  Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning , 1991, STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI.

[47]  Kathleen M. Carley.  Organizational Learning and Personnel Turnover , 1992 .