Mapping invasive wetland plants in the Hudson River National Estuarine Research Reserve using quickbird satellite imagery

Abstract The National Estuarine Research Reserve (NERR) program is a nationally coordinated research and monitoring program that identifies and tracks changes in ecological resources of representative estuarine ecosystems and coastal watersheds. In recent years, attention has focused on using high spatial and spectral resolution satellite imagery to map and monitor wetland plant communities in the NERRs, particularly invasive plant species. The utility of this technology for that purpose has yet to be assessed in detail. To that end, a specific high spatial resolution satellite imagery, QuickBird, was used to map plant communities and monitor invasive plants within the Hudson River NERR (HRNERR). The HRNERR contains four diverse tidal wetlands (Stockport Flats, Tivoli Bays, Iona Island, and Piermont), each with unique water chemistry (i.e., brackish, oligotrophic and fresh) and, consequently, unique assemblages of plant communities, including three invasive plants (Trapa natans, Phragmites australis, and Lythrum salicaria). A maximum-likelihood classification was used to produce 20-class land cover maps for each of the four marshes within the HRNERR. Conventional contingency tables and a fuzzy set analysis served as a basis for an accuracy assessment of these maps. The overall accuracies, as assessed by the contingency tables, were 73.6%, 68.4%, 67.9%, and 64.9% for Tivoli Bays, Stockport Flats, Piermont, and Iona Island, respectively. Fuzzy assessment tables lead to higher estimates of map accuracies of 83%, 75%, 76%, and 76%, respectively. In general, the open water/tidal channel class was the most accurately mapped class and Scirpus sp. was the least accurately mapped. These encouraging accuracies suggest that high-resolution satellite imagery offers significant potential for the mapping of invasive plant species in estuarine environments.

[1]  Duccio Rocchini,et al.  Testing the spectral variation hypothesis by using satellite multispectral images , 2004 .

[2]  Marjorie J. Wonham,et al.  Invasion of Coastal Marine Communities in North America: Apparent Patterns, Processes, and Biases , 2000 .

[3]  Gerald J. Niemi,et al.  Mapping submergent aquatic vegetation in the US Great Lakes using Quickbird satellite data , 2005 .

[4]  P. Sullivan,et al.  Influence of wavelet type on the classification of marsh vegetation from satellite imagery using a combination of wavelet texture and statistical component analyses , 2007 .

[5]  P. Templer,et al.  Sediment chemistry associated with native and non-native emergent macrophytes of a Hudson River marsh ecosystem , 1998, Wetlands.

[6]  G. Zalidis,et al.  Habitat inventory on two greek wetlands , 1997, Wetlands.

[7]  J. R. Coulson,et al.  Biological Control of Purple LoosestrifeA case for using insects as control agents, after rigorous screening, and for integrating release strategies with research , 1993 .

[8]  P. Gong,et al.  Comparison of IKONOS and QuickBird images for mapping mangrove species on the Caribbean coast of Panama , 2004 .

[9]  Desire L. Massart,et al.  Evaluation of the required sample size in some supervised pattern recognition techniques , 1989 .

[10]  James T. Carlton,et al.  Introduced species in U.S. coastal waters: environmental impacts and management priorities , 2003 .

[11]  Sucharita Gopal,et al.  Fuzzy set theory and thematic maps: accuracy assessment and area estimation , 2000, Int. J. Geogr. Inf. Sci..

[12]  N. Loneragan,et al.  Mapping and characterising subtropical estuarine landscapes using aerial photography and GIS for potential application in wildlife conservation and management , 2005 .

[13]  Magdeline Laba,et al.  Conventional and fuzzy accuracy assessment of the New York Gap Analysis Project land cover map , 2002 .

[14]  R. Tiner.  A Field Guide to Coastal Wetland Plants of the Northeastern United States , 1987 .

[15]  R. O'Neill,et al.  The value of the world's ecosystem services and natural capital , 1997, Nature.

[16]  Lotfi A. Zadeh,et al.  Fuzzy Sets , 1996, Inf. Control..

[17]  Russell G. Congalton,et al.  Assessing the accuracy of remotely sensed data : principles and practices , 1998 .

[18]  Shunfu Hu,et al.  Inventory and characterization of wetland habitat on the Winnebago upper pool lakes, Wisconsin, USA: An integrated multimedia-gis approach , 2003, Wetlands.

[19]  Duccio Rocchini,et al.  Maximizing plant species inventory efficiency by means of remotely sensed spectral distances , 2005 .

[20]  Fuan Tsai,et al.  Texture augmented analysis of high resolution satellite imagery in detecting invasive plant species , 2006 .

[21]  R. Askins,et al.  Impact of the spread ofPhragmites on the distribution of birds in Connecticut tidal marshes , 1999, Wetlands.

[22]  Cohen,et al.  Accelerating invasion rate in a highly invaded estuary , 1998, Science.

[23]  C. Woodcock,et al.  Theory and methods for accuracy assessment of thematic maps using fuzzy sets , 1994 .

[24]  Peng Gong,et al.  Integration of object-based and pixel-based classification for mapping mangroves with IKONOS imagery , 2004 .

[25]  Philip H. Swain,et al.  Remote Sensing: The Quantitative Approach , 1981, IEEE Transactions on Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence.

[26]  R. Congalton,et al.  Accuracy assessment: a user's perspective , 1986 .

[27]  John M. Randall,et al.  Weed Control for the Preservation of Biological Diversity , 1996, Weed Technology.

[28]  Arthur Cronquist,et al.  Manual of Vascular Plants of Northeastern United States and Adjacent Canada , 2004 .

[29]  Edwin D. Grosholz,et al.  Ecological and evolutionary consequences of coastal invasions , 2002 .

[30]  E. Grosholz,et al.  Global Invasions of Marine and Estuarine Habitats by Non-Indigenous Species: Mechanisms, Extent, and Consequences' , 1997 .

[31]  J. A. Perry,et al.  Decomposition rates and phosphorus concentrations of purple Loosestrife (Lythrum salicaria) and Cattail (Typha spp.) in fourteen Minnesota wetlands , 1996, Hydrobiologia.