Shape determination of microcalcifications in simulated digital mammography images with varying pixel size
暂无分享,去创建一个
Anders Tingberg | Mark Ruschin | Bengt Hemdal | Magnus Bath | M. Ruschin | A. Tingberg | M. Båth | B. Hemdal
[1] J. Coltman. The Specification of Imaging Properties by Response to a Sine Wave Input , 1954 .
[2] S. Obenauer,et al. Comparative study in patients with microcalcifications: full-field digital mammography vs screen-film mammography , 2002, European Radiology.
[3] N Karssemeijer,et al. Spatial Resolution in Digital Mammography , 1993, Investigative radiology.
[4] A R Cowen,et al. Visibility of microcalcifications in computed and screen-film mammography. , 1997, Physics in medicine and biology.
[5] J M Lewin,et al. Comparison of full-field digital mammography with screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. , 2001, Radiology.
[6] M Ruschin,et al. Threshold pixel size for shape determination of microcalcifications in digital mammography: a pilot study. , 2005, Radiation protection dosimetry.
[7] Per Skaane,et al. Population-based mammography screening: comparison of screen-film and full-field digital mammography with soft-copy reading--Oslo I study. , 2003, Radiology.
[8] H L Kundel,et al. Nodule detection with and without a chest image. , 1985, Investigative radiology.
[9] Christoph Hoeschen,et al. Determination of the x-ray intensity pattern in mammography with very high-spatial resolution , 2000, Medical Imaging.
[10] M A King,et al. Relative importance of the error sources in Wiener restoration of scintigrams. , 1990, IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging.
[11] A. Burgess,et al. Human observer detection experiments with mammograms and power-law noise. , 2001, Medical physics.