Skin comfort of base layer wool garments. Part 2: Fiber diameter effects on fabric and garment prickle
暂无分享,去创建一个
[1] Morten Meilgaard,et al. Sensory Evaluation Techniques , 2020 .
[2] Grs Naylor,et al. Time of shearing and the diameter characteristics of fibre ends in the processed top: An opportunity for improved skin comfort in garments. , 1997 .
[3] K. Hansford,et al. Fibre end diameter properties in processed top relative to the staple for wool grown in a Mediterranean climate and shorn in different seasons. , 1999 .
[4] Maryam Naebe,et al. Relationship between wearer prickle response with fibre and garment properties and Wool ComfortMeter assessment , 2013 .
[5] G. R.S. Naylor,et al. THE COARSE FIBRE COMPONENT AND FIBRE END DIAMETER CHARACTERISTICS OF AUSTRALIAN WOOL TOPS , 1996 .
[6] Grs Naylor,et al. Fabric-Evoked Prickle in Worsted Spun Single Jersey Fabrics Part I: The Role of Fiber End Diameter Characteristics , 1997 .
[7] R. Barker,et al. Evaluating the heat stress and comfort of firefighter and emergency responder protective clothing , 2011 .
[8] D. G. Phillips,et al. Fabric-Evoked Prickle in Worsted Spun Single Jersey Fabrics Part III: Wear Trial Studies of Absolute Fabric Acceptability , 1997 .
[9] A. K. Roy Choudhury,et al. Factors affecting comfort: human physiology and the role of clothing , 2011 .
[10] Grs Naylor,et al. Knitted fabric made from 23.2um wool can be less prickly than fabric made from finer 21.5um wool. , 1992 .
[11] F. S. Kilinc-Balci. How consumers perceive comfort in apparel , 2011 .
[12] N. Hollies,et al. Improved Comfort Polyester , 1984 .
[13] R. Westerman,et al. Identification of the physical stimulus and the neural basis of fabric-evoked prickle. , 1988, Journal of neurophysiology.
[14] D. H. Tester. Relationship between Comfort Meter values and the prickle rating of garments in wearer trials , 2010 .
[15] R. M. Laing,et al. CLOTHING, TEXTILES, AND HUMAN PERFORMANCE , 2002 .
[17] G. A. Carnaby,et al. Measurement of the Surface Prickle of Fabrics Part I: The Evaluation of Potential Objective Methods , 1990 .
[18] P. Watkins. Garment pattern design and comfort , 2011 .
[19] C. M. Oldham,et al. Shearing Time of Mediterranean Wools and Fabric Skin Comfort , 2004 .
[20] G. R. S. Naylor,et al. Fabric-Evoked Prickle in Worsted Spun Single Jersey Fabrics Part II: The Role of Fiber Length, Yarn Count, and Fabric Cover Factor , 1997 .
[21] R. J. Mayfield,et al. Fabric-Evoked Prickle , 1992 .
[22] Norman R. S. Hollies,et al. A Human Perception Analysis Approach to Clothing Comfort , 1979 .
[23] Grs Naylor,et al. The relative importance of mean diameter and coefficient of variation of sale lots in determining the potential skin comfort of wool fabrics. , 1995 .
[24] N. Hollies,et al. Improved Comfort Polyester , 1984 .
[25] J. Ukponmwan,et al. THE THERMAL-INSULATION PROPERTIES OF FABRICS , 1993 .
[26] Grs Naylor,et al. The mechanics of fibre buckling in relation to fabric-evoked prickle. , 1992 .
[27] Ramasamy Alagirusamy,et al. Science in Clothing Comfort , 2010 .
[28] G. R. S. Naylor,et al. Fabric-evoked Prickle in Worsted Spun Single Jersey Fabrics Part 4: Extension from Wool to OptimTMfine Fiber , 2010 .
[29] Geoffrey Rs Naylor,et al. An instrument for assessing fabric prickle propensity , 2012 .
[30] Guowen Song,et al. Improving Comfort in Clothing , 2011 .
[31] G. A. Carnaby,et al. Measurement of the Surface Prickle of Fabrics Part II: Some Effects of Finishing on Fabric Prickle , 1990 .