Feature-based inheritance networks for computational lexicons

The virtues of viewing the lexicon as an inheritance network are its succinctness and its tendency to highlight significant clusters of linguistic properties. From its succinctness follow two practical advantages, namely its ease of maintenance and modification. In this paper we present a feature-based foundation for lexical inheritance. We argue that the feature-based foundation is both more economical and expressively more powerful than non-feature-based systems. It is more economical because it employs only mechanisms already assumed to be present elsewhere in the grammar (viz., in the feature system), and it is more expressive because feature systems are more expressive than other mechanisms used in expressing lexical inheritance (cf. DATR). The lexicon furthermore allows the use of default unification, based on the ideas of default unification, defined by Bouma. These claims are buttressed in sections sketching the opportunities for lexical description in feature-based lexicons in two central lexical topics, inflection and derivation. Briefly, we argue that the central notion of paradigm may be defined in feature structures, and that it may be more satisfactorily (in fact, immediately) linked to the syntactic information in this fashion. Our discussion of derivation is more programmatic; but here, too, we argue that feature structures of a suitably rich sort provide a foundation for the definition of lexical rules. We illustrate theoretical claims in application to German lexis. This work is currently under implementation in a natural language understanding effort (DISCO) at the German Artiffical Intelligence Center (Deutsches Forschungszentrum fur Kunstliche Intelligenz).

[1]  J. Sadock Autolexical syntax: A proposal for the treatment of noun incorporation and similar phenomena , 1985 .

[2]  Geoffrey K. Pullum,et al.  Generalized Phrase Structure Grammar , 1985 .

[3]  CurteanuNeculai Review of "Lecture on contemporary syntactic theories , 1987 .

[4]  Andreas Eisele,et al.  A Comprehensive Unication-Based Grammar Formalism , 1991 .

[5]  Jindřich Toman,et al.  Wortsyntax : eine Diskussion ausgewählter Probleme deutscher Wortbildung , 1987 .

[6]  Yunheng Ji MORPHOLOGY , 1937, A Grammar of Italian Sign Language (LIS).

[7]  Martin Kay Functional Unification Grammar: a formalism for machine translation , 1984 .

[8]  Gosse Bouma Defaults in Unification Grammar , 1990, ACL.

[9]  P. Matthews Inflectional Morphology: A Theoretical Study Based on Aspects of Latin Verb Conjugation , 1972 .

[10]  Fernando Pereira,et al.  The Formalism and Implementation of PATR-II , 1983 .

[11]  Jonathan Calder,et al.  Paradigmatic Morphology , 1989, EACL.

[12]  D. Flickinger Lexical rules in the hierarchical lexicon , 1989 .

[13]  Ingrid Renz,et al.  DATR As A Lexical Component For PATR , 1991, EACL.

[14]  Mark Johnson,et al.  Attribute-value logic and the theory of grammar , 1988 .

[15]  Ivan A. Sag,et al.  Information-based syntax and semantics , 1987 .

[16]  Harald Trost The application of two-level morphology to non-concatenative German morphology , 1990, COLING.

[17]  Kimmo Koskenniemi,et al.  Two-Level Model for Morphological Analysis , 1983, IJCAI.

[18]  William C. Rounds,et al.  A Complete Logical Calculus for Record Structures Representing Linguistic Information , 1986, LICS.

[19]  Günther Görz,et al.  Towards the Integration of Functions, Relations and Types in an AI Programming Language , 1990, GWAI.

[20]  Martin Kay,et al.  Parsing in functional unification grammar , 1986 .

[21]  Robert T. Kasper,et al.  A Logical Semantics for Feature Structures , 1986, ACL.

[22]  Emmon Bach,et al.  Categorial Grammars as Theories of Language , 1988 .

[23]  Luca Cardelli,et al.  On understanding types, data abstraction, and polymorphism , 1985, CSUR.

[24]  Lauri Karttunen,et al.  D-PATR: A Development Environment for Unification-Based Grammars , 1986, COLING.

[25]  Dan Flickinger,et al.  Structure-Sharing in Lexical Representation , 1985, ACL.

[26]  J H Allen,et al.  New Latin grammar , 1903 .

[27]  Stephen G. Pulman,et al.  A Computational Framework for Lexical Description , 1987, Comput. Linguistics.

[28]  Dan Flickinger,et al.  Inheritance and Complementation: a Case Study of Easy Adjectives and Related Nouns , 1992, CL.

[29]  C. Pollard,et al.  Center for the Study of Language and Information , 2022 .

[30]  Jack Hoeksema Categorial Morphology (Rle Linguistics B: Grammar) , 1985 .

[31]  Alex Franz,et al.  The Specification and Implementation of Constraint-Based Unification Grammars , 1991, IWPT.

[32]  M. Baltin,et al.  The Mental representation of grammatical relations , 1985 .

[33]  Harold L. Somers,et al.  Linguistic Theory and Computer Applications , 1987 .

[34]  Gert Smolka,et al.  A Feature Logic with Subsorts , 1988, LILOG-Report.

[35]  Bob Carpenter,et al.  The logic of typed feature structures , 1992 .

[36]  Andreas Eisele,et al.  Determining Consistency of Feature Terms with Distributed Disjunctions , 1989, GWAI.

[37]  David S. Moore,et al.  An introduction to data analysis , 1980 .

[38]  William R. Cook,et al.  Inheritance is not subtyping , 1989, POPL '90.

[39]  Arnold M. Zwicky,et al.  How to Describe Inflection , 1985 .

[40]  A. Zwicky,et al.  Inflectional morphology as a (sub)component of grammar , 1990 .