Integration, Flexibility and Transversality: Essential Characteristics of ERP Systems

The interest of firms in ERP systems has been echoed in both the scientific and professional literature. It is worth noting however that while this literature has become increasingly abundant, there does not yet exist an operational definition of the ERP concept that is, if not unanimously, at least widely accepted. This constitutes a handicap for both the research and practice communities. The present study outlines what could be considered as an ERP by first determining the essentially required characteristics of such a system : integration, flexibility and transversality. Indicators are then provided in order to operationalise these three characteristics. The study concludes by proposing a research framework on the impact of an ERP’s key characteristics upon the performance of the system in a given organisational setting.

[1]  Derrick E. D'Souza,et al.  Toward a taxonomy of manufacturing flexibility dimensions , 2000 .

[2]  L. Hitt,et al.  ERP Investment : Business Impact and Productivity Measures , 2002 .

[3]  Jos van Hillegersberg,et al.  ERP Adoption by European Midsize Companies. , 2000 .

[4]  Graeme G. Shanks,et al.  A taxonomy of ERP implementation approaches , 2000, Proceedings of the 33rd Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

[5]  Sia Siew Kien,et al.  Enterprise resource planning: cultural fits and misfits: is ERP a universal solution? , 2000, CACM.

[6]  Judy E. Scott.  The FoxMeyer Drugs' Bankruptcy: Was it a Failure of ERP? , 1999 .

[7]  Marc Antoni,et al.  Process orientation: The Swedish experience , 1999 .

[8]  T. Davenport.  Putting the enterprise into the enterprise system. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[9]  Guy Forest,et al.  Généalogie des ERP et gestion des flux physiques , 1999 .

[10]  D. Truex.  ERP Systems as Facilitating and Confounding factors in Corporate Mergers: the case of two Canadian telecommunications companies , 2001 .

[11]  Arun Rai,et al.  Intermediate Performance Impacts of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Systems: An Empirical Investigation* , 1999 .

[12]  Elgar Fleisch,et al.  Business Networking: Shaping Collaboration Between Enterprises , 2001 .

[13]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Paradigm Shifts - E-Business and Business/Systems Integration , 2000, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[14]  M. Markus,et al.  The Enterprise System Experience— From Adoption to Success , 2000 .

[15]  Wilhelm Hasselbring,et al.  Information system integration , 2000, CACM.

[16]  H. Barki.  Explaining ERP Implementation Effort and Benefits With Organizational Integration 1 , 2002 .

[17]  Joan Antoni Pastor,et al.  Enterprise Resource Planning Systems Research: An Annotated Bibliography , 2001, Commun. Assoc. Inf. Syst..

[18]  Martine Carbonel,et al.  Dérives organisationnellesdans les projets ERP :les cas de Guerbet et Gaumont , 2001 .

[19]  Nancy Bogucki Duncan,et al.  Capturing Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: A Study of Resource Characteristics and their Measure , 1995, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[20]  Michael Rosemann,et al.  What is ERP? , 2000, Inf. Syst. Frontiers.

[21]  H. Barki.  The Construct of Organizational Integration : A Research Framework and Its Application to Enterprise Systems Research , 2003 .

[22]  Sergio Beretta,et al.  Unleashing the integration potential of ERP systems: The role of process-based performance measurement systems , 2002, Bus. Process. Manag. J..

[23]  H. James Harrington,et al.  The Fallacy of Universal Best Practices , 1997 .

[24]  Terry Anthony Byrd,et al.  Measuring the Flexibility of Information Technology Infrastructure: Exploratory Analysis of a Construct , 2000, J. Manag. Inf. Syst..

[25]  M. Lynne Markus,et al.  Reflections on the systems integration enterprise , 2001 .

[26]  Philip Powell,et al.  Towards a definition of flexibility: in search of the Holy Grail? , 2000 .

[27]  Robert W. Smyth,et al.  Challenges to Successful ERP Use , 2001, ECIS.