Prosodic phonological representations early in visual word recognition.

Two experiments examined the nature of the phonological representations used during visual word recognition. We tested whether a minimality constraint (R. Frost, 1998) limits the complexity of early representations to a simple string of phonemes. Alternatively, readers might activate elaborated representations that include prosodic syllable information before lexical access. In a modified lexical decision task (Experiment 1), words were preceded by parafoveal previews that were congruent with a target's initial syllable as well as previews that contained 1 letter more or less than the initial syllable. Lexical decision times were faster in the syllable congruent conditions than in the incongruent conditions. In Experiment 2, we recorded brain electrical potentials (electroencephalograms) during single word reading in a masked priming paradigm. The event-related potential waveform elicited in the syllable congruent condition was more positive 250-350 ms posttarget compared with the waveform elicited in the syllable incongruent condition. In combination, these experiments demonstrate that readers process prosodic syllable information early in visual word recognition in English. They offer further evidence that skilled readers routinely activate elaborated, speechlike phonological representations during silent reading.

[1]  Jonathan Grainger,et al.  On the Time Course of Visual Word Recognition: An Event-related Potential Investigation using Masked Repetition Priming , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[2]  K. Rastle,et al.  Masked phonological priming effects in English: Are they real? Do they matter? , 2006, Cognitive Psychology.

[3]  Jane Ashby,et al.  Prosody in Skilled Silent Reading: Evidence from Eye Movements. , 2006 .

[4]  K. Rayner,et al.  Punctuation and intonation effects on clause and sentence wrap-up: Evidence from eye movements , 2006 .

[5]  Rebecca Treiman,et al.  Vowel processing during silent reading: evidence from eye movements. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[6]  Manuel Carreiras,et al.  Early Event-related Potential Effects of Syllabic Processing during Visual Word Recognition , 2005, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[7]  C. Clifton,et al.  The prosodic property of lexical stress affects eye movements during silent reading , 2005, Cognition.

[8]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  Effects of syllable-frequency in lexical decision and naming: An eye-movement study , 2005, Brain and Language.

[9]  Arthur M. Jacobs,et al.  Inhibitory effects of first syllable-frequency in lexical decision: an event-related potential study , 2004, Neuroscience Letters.

[10]  John F Connolly,et al.  Determining the role of phonology in silent reading using event-related brain potentials. , 2004, Brain research. Cognitive brain research.

[11]  K. Rayner,et al.  Representing syllable information during silent reading: Evidence from eye movements , 2004 .

[12]  H. Barber,et al.  Syllable-frequency effects in visual word recognition: evidence from ERPs , 2004, Neuroreport.

[13]  Grégory Simon,et al.  CHRONOMETRY OF VISUAL WORD RECOGNITION DURING PASSIVE AND LEXICAL DECISION TASKS: AN ERP INVESTIGATION , 2004, The International journal of neuroscience.

[14]  Joan Bybee Phonology and Language Use , 2001, Phonetica.

[15]  Boris New,et al.  Syllabic length effects in visual word recognition and naming. , 2003, Acta psychologica.

[16]  Jenn-Yeu Chen,et al.  Masked Priming of the Syllable in Mandarin Chinese Speech Production , 2003 .

[17]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Masked priming effects with syllabic neighbors in a lexical decision task. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[18]  S. Lupker,et al.  Phonological effects in visual word recognition: investigating the impact of feedback activation. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[19]  Ludovic Ferrand,et al.  Reading aloud polysyllabic words and nonwords: The syllabic length effect reexamined , 2000, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[20]  N. Schiller Single word production in english: the role of subsyllabic units during phonological encoding. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[21]  Niels O. Schiller,et al.  Masked Syllable Priming of English Nouns , 1999, Brain and Language.

[22]  J. Pernier,et al.  ERP Manifestations of Processing Printed Words at Different Psycholinguistic Levels: Time Course and Scalp Distribution , 1999, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[23]  H. Jasper,et al.  The ten-twenty electrode system of the International Federation. The International Federation of Clinical Neurophysiology. , 1999, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[24]  K. Rayner Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[25]  Merriam-Webster Merriam-Webster's Collegiate Dictionary , 1998 .

[26]  Janet Dean Fodor,et al.  Learning To Parse? , 1998 .

[27]  M. Carreiras,et al.  Effects of Syllable Frequency and Syllable Neighborhood Frequency in Visual Word Recognition , 1998 .

[28]  R Frost,et al.  Toward a strong phonological theory of visual word recognition: true issues and false trails. , 1998, Psychological bulletin.

[29]  G W Humphreys,et al.  The syllable’s role in word naming , 1997, Memory & cognition.

[30]  G. Stone,et al.  Perception Is a Two-Way Street: Feedforward and Feedback Phonology in Visual Word Recognition ☆ , 1997 .

[31]  Nancy K. Squires,et al.  Phonological Processing and the Role of Strategy in Silent Reading: Behavioral and Electrophysiological Evidence , 1996, Brain and Language.

[32]  A Pollatsek,et al.  On the use of counterbalanced designs in cognitive research: a suggestion for a better and more powerful analysis. , 1995, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[33]  John M. Henderson,et al.  EVIDENCE FOR THE USE OF PHONOLOGICAL REPRESENTATIONS DURING TRANSSACCADIC WORD RECOGNITION , 1995 .

[34]  C. J. Álvarez,et al.  Syllable Frequency and Visual Word Recognition in Spanish , 1993 .

[35]  K. Rayner,et al.  Fast priming during eye fixations in reading. , 1992, Journal of experimental psychology. Human perception and performance.

[36]  William D. Marslen-Wilson,et al.  Lexical Representation and Process , 1989, Language.

[37]  C Van Petten,et al.  Electrophysiological perspectives on comprehending written language. , 1990, Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology. Supplement.

[38]  Uli H. Frauenfelder,et al.  Understanding words and word recognition: can phonology help? , 1989 .

[39]  Isabelle Y. Liberman,et al.  Phonology and reading disability : solving the reading puzzle , 1989 .

[40]  Isabelle Y. Liberman,et al.  The alphabetic principle and learning to read. , 1989 .

[41]  Michael Wilson,et al.  MRC psycholinguistic database: Machine-usable dictionary, version 2.00 , 1988 .

[42]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials and the interaction between orthographic and phonological information in a rhyme-judgment task , 1987, Brain and Language.

[43]  E Donchin,et al.  Brain potentials as indices of orthographic and phonological interaction during word matching. , 1987, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[44]  Michael D. Rugg,et al.  Event-related potentials in phonological matching tasks , 1984, Brain and Language.

[45]  M. Kutas,et al.  Brain potentials during reading reflect word expectancy and semantic association , 1984, Nature.

[46]  G. McConkie,et al.  Integrating information across eye movements , 1980, Cognitive Psychology.

[47]  J. Requin Attention and Performance VII , 1980 .

[48]  K. Rayner The perceptual span and peripheral cues in reading , 1975, Cognitive Psychology.