Anomia: A doubly typical signature of semantic dementia

This study was designed to explore the nature of the anomia that is a defining feature of semantic dementia. Using a pool of 225 sets of picture naming data from 78 patients, we assessed the effects on naming accuracy of several characteristics of the target objects or their names: familiarity, frequency, age of acquisition and semantic domain (living/non-living). We also analysed the distribution of different error types according to the severity of the naming deficit. A particular focus of the study was the impact on naming of a previously unconsidered variable: the typicality of an object within its semantic category. This factor had a major influence both on naming success and on the proportions of different error types. Moreover, and increasingly so with declining naming accuracy, the patients' single-word incorrect responses were more typical than the target names. The observed effects of typicality sit well within models of semantic memory that represent concepts in terms of patterns of co-occurrence of constituent features. The results add to a growing body of evidence that, throughout the progressive deterioration of conceptual knowledge that characterises semantic dementia, both accuracy of performance and the nature of error responses are increasingly determined by the domain-specific aspects of typicality relevant to the task in question.

[1]  T. Rogers,et al.  Semantic dementia and fluent primary progressive aphasia: two sides of the same coin? , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[2]  J. Hodges,et al.  The relationship between comprehension and oral reading in progressive fluent aphasia , 1994, Neuropsychologia.

[3]  T. Rogers,et al.  Object recognition under semantic impairment: The effects of conceptual regularities on perceptual decisions , 2003 .

[4]  Karalyn Patterson,et al.  The reign of typicality in semantic memory , 2007, Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences.

[5]  J. Hodges,et al.  Semantic dementia. Progressive fluent aphasia with temporal lobe atrophy. , 1992 .

[6]  J. Hodges,et al.  Non-verbal semantic impairment in semantic dementia , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[7]  R. Glushko The Organization and Activation of Orthographic Knowledge in Reading Aloud. , 1979 .

[8]  T. Rogers,et al.  Object categorization: reversals and explanations of the basic-level advantage. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[9]  J. Raven Coloured progressive matrices : sets A, Ab, B , 1956 .

[10]  D. Plaut,et al.  SD-squared: on the association between semantic dementia and surface dyslexia. , 2007, Psychological review.

[11]  T. Rogers,et al.  A duck with four legs: Investigating the structure of conceptual knowledge using picture drawing in semantic dementia , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[12]  H. Spinnler,et al.  Slowly progressive semantic impairment with category specificity , 1995 .

[13]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes. , 2004, Psychological review.

[14]  Peter Garrard,et al.  SEMANTIC DEMENTIA WITH CATEGORY SPECIFICITY:ACOMPARATIVE CASE-SERIES STUDY , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[15]  J. Hodges,et al.  Semantic dementia: a unique clinicopathological syndrome , 2007, The Lancet Neurology.

[16]  E. Funnell Objects and properties: a study of the breakdown of semantic memory. , 1995, Memory.

[17]  Uta Noppeney,et al.  Temporal lobe lesions and semantic impairment: a comparison of herpes simplex virus encephalitis and semantic dementia. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[18]  Glyn W. Humphreys,et al.  Cascade processes in picture identification , 1988 .

[19]  K. Patterson,et al.  ‘Non-semantic’Aspects of Language in Semantic Dementia: As Normal as They’re Said to Be? , 2006, Neurocase.

[20]  D. Neary,et al.  Knowledge of famous faces and names in semantic dementia. , 2004, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  E. Warrington Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology the Selective Impairment of Semantic Memory the Selective Impairment of Semantic Memory , 2022 .

[22]  Glyn W Humphreys,et al.  A CASE SERIES ANALYSIS OF “CATEGORY-SPECIFIC” DEFICITS OF LIVING THINGS:THE HIT ACCOUNT , 2003, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[23]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Deficits in irregular past-tense verb morphology associated with degraded semantic knowledge , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[24]  T. Rogers,et al.  Neural basis of category-specific semantic deficits for living things: evidence from semantic dementia, HSVE and a neural network model. , 2006, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[25]  J. Rodd,et al.  Distinctiveness and correlation in conceptual structure: behavioral and computational studies. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[26]  Matthew A. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects in adult lexical processing reflect loss of plasticity in maturing systems: insights from connectionist networks. , 2000 .

[27]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  How the Camel Lost Its Hump: The Impact of Object Typicality on Event-related Potential Signals in Object Decision , 2007, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[28]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Prototypicality, distinctiveness, and intercorrelation: Analyses of the semantic attributes of living and nonliving concepts , 2001, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[29]  K. Patterson,et al.  The impact of semantic memory impairment on spelling: evidence from semantic dementia , 2000, Neuropsychologia.

[30]  G. Dell,et al.  A Case-Series Test of the Interactive Two-Step Model of Lexical Access: Evidence from Picture Naming. , 2006 .

[31]  Lorna I Morrow,et al.  The representation of ontological category concepts as affected by healthy aging: Normative data and theoretical implications , 2005, Behavior research methods.

[32]  S. Folstein,et al.  "Mini-mental state". A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. , 1975, Journal of psychiatric research.

[33]  J. Hodges,et al.  When objects lose their meaning: What happens to their use? , 2002, Cognitive, affective & behavioral neuroscience.

[34]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Structure and deterioration of semantic memory: a neuropsychological and computational investigation. , 2004, Psychological review.

[35]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  On the nature and scope of featural representations of word meaning. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[36]  Timothy T. Rogers,et al.  NATURAL SELECTION: THE IMPACT OF SEMANTIC IMPAIRMENT ON LEXICAL AND OBJECT DECISION , 2004, Cognitive neuropsychology.

[37]  Andrew W. Ellis,et al.  Age of Acquisition Norms for a Large Set of Object Names and Their Relation to Adult Estimates and Other Variables , 1997 .

[38]  D. Neary,et al.  Semantic dementia: a form of circumscribed cerebral atrophy , 1995 .

[39]  Karalyn Patterson,et al.  The pathological basis of semantic dementia. , 2005, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[40]  R. H. Baayen,et al.  The CELEX Lexical Database (CD-ROM) , 1996 .

[41]  Rosaleen A. McCarthy,et al.  Reading without Semantics , 1983 .

[42]  J. G. Snodgrass,et al.  A standardized set of 260 pictures: norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. , 1980, Journal of experimental psychology. Human learning and memory.

[43]  M. L. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Age of acquisition effects depend on the mapping between representations and the frequency of occurrence: Empirical and computational evidence , 2006 .

[44]  K. Patterson,et al.  Drawing and the Non-Verbal Mind: Drawing as a ‘window’ on deteriorating conceptual knowledge in neurodegenerative disease , 2008 .

[45]  Roy W Jones,et al.  Presemantic Cognition in Semantic Dementia: Six Deficits in Search of an Explanation , 2006 .

[46]  Mark S. Seidenberg,et al.  Category-Specific Semantic Deficits in Focal and Widespread Brain Damage: A Computational Account , 1998, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[47]  Adrian Ivanoiu,et al.  Semantic memory in Alzheimer's disease and the frontotemporal dementias: a longitudinal study of 236 patients. , 2006, Neuropsychology.

[48]  Elizabeth Jefferies,et al.  Surface Dyslexia in Semantic Dementia: A Comparison of the Influence of Consistency and Regularity , 2004, Neurocase.

[49]  Matthew A. Lambon Ralph,et al.  Naming in semantic dementia—what matters? , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[50]  J. Hodges,et al.  Is a Picture Worth a Thousand Words? Evidence from Concept Definitions by Patients with Semantic Dementia , 1999, Brain and Language.

[51]  J. Hodges,et al.  Charting the progression in semantic dementia: implications for the organisation of semantic memory. , 1995 .

[52]  James L. McClelland,et al.  No Right to Speak? The Relationship between Object Naming and Semantic Impairment:Neuropsychological Evidence and a Computational Model , 2001, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.

[53]  Friedemann Pulvermüller,et al.  [Q:] When Would You Prefer a SOSSAGE to a SAUSAGE? [A:] At about 100 msec. ERP Correlates of Orthographic Typicality and Lexicality in Written Word Recognition , 2006, Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience.