Speech level in rooms with very low and very high reverberation

Numerous studies have dealt so far with changing in speech production for talkers due to different acoustic environments, but mostly have been focused on the effect of noise or distance from the listeners and not many on the effect of reverberation. Reverberation has an influence on the voice production, supporting talkers as well as increasing speech level towards an audience. In spite of its positive effects, excessive reverberation influences talkers making them use erroneous vocal behaviors, which may be cause of discomfort and a risk for vocal health, especially in the case of prolonged speech, as for teachers in classrooms. The present work explores the differences in sound pressure level and sound power level of running speech from several speakers, in semi-anechoic and reverberant rooms. Two types of spontaneous speech, a free monologue and the description of a map, have been addressed with a communicative intent to a listener seated at a fixed distance of 6 m. Measurements have been carried out with a headworn microphone and with Voice Care, a voice dosimeter based on a contact microphone. Subjective impressions were caught after subjects have spoken in the two rooms.

[1]  John W. Black The Effect of Room Characteristics upon Vocal Intensity and Rate , 1949 .

[2]  Arianna Astolfi,et al.  Validation of calibration procedures and uncertainty estimation of contact-microphone based vocal analyzers , 2015 .

[3]  Bernice W. Polemis Nonparametric Statistics for the Behavioral Sciences , 1959 .

[4]  Kaustubh Kalgaonkar,et al.  Talker-to-listener distance effects on speech production and perception. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[5]  Svante Granqvist,et al.  The softest sound levels of the human voice in normal subjects. , 2015, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[6]  Jonas Brunskog,et al.  Speakers' comfort and voice level variation in classrooms: laboratory research. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[7]  Pasquale Bottalico,et al.  Investigations into vocal doses and parameters pertaining to primary school teachers in classrooms. , 2012, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[8]  Cheol-Ho Jeong,et al.  Vocal effort with changing talker-to-listener distance in different acoustic environments. , 2011, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[9]  Ingo R Titze,et al.  Estimation of sound pressure levels of voiced speech from skin vibration of the neck. , 2005, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[10]  Jonas Brunskog,et al.  Increase in voice level and speaker comfort in lecture rooms. , 2009, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[11]  I R Titze,et al.  On the relation between subglottal pressure and fundamental frequency in phonation. , 1989, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[12]  Arianna Astolfi,et al.  Design Issues for a Portable Vocal Analyzer , 2013, IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement.

[13]  J C Junqua,et al.  The Lombard reflex and its role on human listeners and automatic speech recognizers. , 1993, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[14]  R. H. Bernacki,et al.  Effects of noise on speech production: acoustic and perceptual analyses. , 1988, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.

[15]  Robert E Hillman,et al.  Ambulatory Monitoring of Disordered Voices , 2006, The Annals of otology, rhinology, and laryngology.

[16]  H. Traunmüller,et al.  Acoustic effects of variation in vocal effort by men, women, and children. , 2000, The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America.