Utilization of available prenatal screening and diagnosis: effects of the California screen program

[1]  M. Essink‐bot,et al.  Ethnic and socio-economic differences in uptake of prenatal diagnostic tests for Down's syndrome. , 2010, European journal of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology.

[2]  S. Bhatt,et al.  Trends in prenatal screening and diagnostic testing among women referred for advanced maternal age , 2010, Prenatal diagnosis.

[3]  T. Shohat,et al.  Determinates of underutilization of amniocentesis among Israeli Arab women , 2010, Prenatal diagnosis.

[4]  A. Tabor,et al.  Fetal loss rate after chorionic villus sampling and amniocentesis: an 11‐year national registry study , 2009, Ultrasound in obstetrics & gynecology : the official journal of the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

[5]  A. Tabor,et al.  Impact of a new national screening policy for Down’s syndrome in Denmark: population based cohort study , 2008, BMJ : British Medical Journal.

[6]  Aaron B. Caughey,et al.  Perceived risk of prenatal diagnostic procedure-related miscarriage and Down syndrome among pregnant women. , 2008, American journal of obstetrics and gynecology.

[7]  T. Jenkins.  Chorionic villus sampling compared with amniocentesis and the difference in the rate of pregnancy loss. , 2007, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[8]  A. Caughey,et al.  Chorionic Villus Sampling Compared With Amniocentesis and the Difference in the Rate of Pregnancy Loss , 2006, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[9]  S. Gregorich,et al.  Beyond Race or Ethnicity and Socioeconomic Status: Predictors of Prenatal Testing for Down Syndrome , 2006, Obstetrics and gynecology.

[10]  A. Rudnicka,et al.  First-trimester or second-trimester screening, or both, for Down's syndrome. , 2005, The New England journal of medicine.

[11]  R. Snijders,et al.  First-trimester screening for trisomies 21 and 18 , 2003 .