Interhemispheric imbalance during visuospatial attention investigated by unilateral and bilateral TMS over human parietal cortices

We used single-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) to study visuospatial attention. TMS was applied over one hemisphere, or simultaneously over both the right and left posterior parietal cortex (PPC), at two different interstimulus intervals (ISI) during a visual detection task. Unilateral TMS over the right and left PPC, respectively, impaired detection of contralateral presented visual stimuli at an ISI of 150 ms. By contrast, simultaneous biparietal TMS induced no significant changes in correct stimulus detection. TMS at an ISI of 250 ms evoked no changes for magnetic stimulation over either the right or the left parietal cortex. These results suggest that both PPC play a crucial role at a relatively early stage in the widely distributed brain network of visuospatial attention. The abolition of behavioral deficits during simultaneous biparietal TMS underlines the common hypothesis that an interhemispheric imbalance might underlie the disorders of neglect and extinction seen following unilateral brain damage.

[1]  J. Sprague,et al.  Interaction of Cortex and Superior Colliculus in Mediation of Visually Guided Behavior in the Cat , 1966, Science.

[2]  E. Bisiach,et al.  1 Hz repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the unaffected hemisphere ameliorates contralesional visuospatial neglect in humans , 2003, Neuroscience Letters.

[3]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Cancellation of visuoparietal lesion-induced spatial neglect , 2003, Experimental Brain Research.

[4]  S. Hillyard,et al.  Event-related brain potentials in the study of visual selective attention. , 1998, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[5]  K. Zilles,et al.  The Neural Basis of Vertical and Horizontal Line Bisection Judgments: An fMRI Study of Normal Volunteers , 2001, NeuroImage.

[6]  E. Bisiach,et al.  Timing of right parietal and frontal cortex activity in visuo-spatial perception: a TMS study in normal individuals , 2001, Neuroreport.

[7]  T. Olsen,et al.  Hemineglect in acute stroke--incidence and prognostic implications. The Copenhagen Stroke Study. , 1997, American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation.

[8]  Filippo Brighina,et al.  Contralateral neglect induced by right posterior parietal rTMS in healthy subjects , 2000, Neuroreport.

[9]  J. Marshall,et al.  Spatial cognition: evidence from visual neglect , 2003, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[10]  Wilhelm Küker,et al.  The cortical substrate of visual extinction , 2003, Neuroreport.

[11]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in cognitive neuroscience – virtual lesion, chronometry, and functional connectivity , 2000, Current Opinion in Neurobiology.

[12]  T. Paus.  Imaging the brain before, during, and after transcranial magnetic stimulation , 1998, Neuropsychologia.

[13]  Uwe Herwig,et al.  Using the International 10-20 EEG System for Positioning of Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation , 2004, Brain Topography.

[14]  E. Olivier,et al.  Event-related TMS over the right posterior parietal cortex induces ipsilateral visuo-spatial interference , 2001, Neuroreport.

[15]  Á. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Enhanced visual spatial attention ipsilateral to rTMS-induced 'virtual lesions' of human parietal cortex , 2001, Nature Neuroscience.

[16]  C. Marzi,et al.  The spatial distribution of visual attention in hemineglect and extinction patients. , 1998, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[17]  A. Pascual-Leone,et al.  Induction of visual extinction by rapid‐rate transcranial magnetic stimulation of parietal lobe , 1994, Neurology.

[18]  M. Kinsbourne.  Hemi-neglect and hemisphere rivalry. , 1977, Advances in neurology.

[19]  Richard S. J. Frackowiak,et al.  Functional localization of the system for visuospatial attention using positron emission tomography. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[20]  C D Frith,et al.  Space-based and object-based visual attention: shared and specific neural domains. , 1997, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[21]  E. Bisiach,et al.  rTMS of the unaffected hemisphere transiently reduces contralesional visuospatial hemineglect , 2001, Neurology.

[22]  E Làdavas,et al.  Selective spatial attention in patients with visual extinction. , 1990, Brain : a journal of neurology.

[23]  G. Fink,et al.  Neural consequences of competing stimuli in both visual hemifields: A physiological basis for visual extinction , 2000, Annals of neurology.

[24]  M Seyal,et al.  Increased sensitivity to ipsilateral cutaneous stimuli following transcranial magnetic stimulation of the parietal lobe , 1995, Annals of neurology.

[25]  P. Astikainen,et al.  Cortical and subcortical visual event‐related potentials to oddball stimuli in rabbits , 2000, Neuroreport.

[26]  S G Lomber,et al.  Removal of two halves restores the whole: Reversal of visual hemineglect during bilateral cortical or collicular inactivation in the cat , 1996, Visual Neuroscience.

[27]  Simon C Gandevia,et al.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) in controlled treatment studies: are some “sham” forms active? , 2000, Biological Psychiatry.

[28]  J. Rothwell,et al.  Motor and phosphene thresholds: a transcranial magnetic stimulation correlation study , 2001, Neuropsychologia.

[29]  Henrik Foltys,et al.  Visual and motor cortex excitability: a transcranial magnetic stimulation study , 2002, Clinical Neurophysiology.

[30]  Georg Kerkhoff,et al.  Spatial hemineglect in humans , 2001, Progress in Neurobiology.

[31]  P. Vuilleumier,et al.  Unilateral spatial neglect recovery after sequential strokes , 1996, Neurology.

[32]  Thomas Dierks,et al.  Tracking the Mind's Image in the Brain II Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Reveals Parietal Asymmetry in Visuospatial Imagery , 2002, Neuron.