Optimal Product Line Design When Consumers Exhibit Choice Set-Dependent Preferences

In a market of consumers with varying willingness to pay, using product line as a discrimination tool may extract higher profits than serving all consumers with a single product. Local context effects, however, point to yet another consideration in designing product lines: how the appeal of a product changes with the context provided by other products in the choice set. I present a model of product line design that incorporates both discrimination and context management goals and offers recommendations for the variety and positioning of products. To this end, the model makes use of a framework that allows preferences to be choice set dependent. Given this framework, I study how the firm manages externalities between products created by such dependencies. The firm creates distortions above and beyond those resulting from discrimination motives alone. For example, in a vertically differentiated market for quality, quality distortions exist even for the consumers with the highest valuations. The range of quality provisions, given the number of products, is compressed as the relative importance of unfavorable comparisons among products increases. Surprisingly, this compression may even lead the firm to forego discrimination among consumers regardless of the cost of offering distinct products.

[1]  I. Simonson,et al.  Choice Based on Reasons: The Case of Attraction and Compromise Effects , 1989 .

[2]  V. Rao,et al.  A General Choice Model for Bundles with Multiple-Category Products: Application to Market Segmentation and Optimal Pricing for Bundles , 2003 .

[3]  Lars Stole,et al.  Nonlinear Pricing and Oligopoly , 1995 .

[4]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  The Evaluability Hypothesis: An Explanation for Preference Reversals between Joint and Separate Evaluations of Alternatives , 1996 .

[5]  Katherine N. Lemon,et al.  The Effect of Local Consideration Sets on Global Choice Between Lower Price and Higher Quality , 1993 .

[6]  Alan D. J. Cooke,et al.  The Role of Task and Context in Preference Measurement , 1996 .

[7]  Pradeep Chintagunta,et al.  Measuring Cross-Category Price Effects with Aggregate Store Data , 2006, Manag. Sci..

[8]  Eric T. Anderson,et al.  Research Note: Price Discrimination as an Adverse Signal: Why an Offer to Spread Payments May Hurt Demand , 2001 .

[9]  S. Chib,et al.  Models of Multi-Category Choice Behavior , 2005 .

[10]  Daniel Klapper,et al.  Another look at loss aversion in brand choice data: Can we characterize the loss averse consumer? , 2005 .

[11]  S. Salant When is Inducing Self-Selection Suboptimal for a Monopolist? , 1989 .

[12]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice in Context: Tradeoff Contrast and Extremeness Aversion , 1992 .

[13]  M. Armstrong Multiproduct Nonlinear Pricing , 1996 .

[14]  A. Tversky,et al.  Choice under Conflict: The Dynamics of Deferred Decision , 1992 .

[15]  Oded Netzer,et al.  Alternative Models for Capturing the Compromise Effect , 2004 .

[16]  J. Miguel Villas-Boas,et al.  Oligopoly with Asymmetric Information: Differentiation in Credit Markets , 1999 .

[17]  M. Rabin,et al.  A Model of Reference-Dependent Preferences , 2006 .

[18]  Lyle Brenner,et al.  Comparison, Grouping, and Preference , 1999 .

[19]  Subramanian Balachander,et al.  The Making of a "Hot Product": A Signaling Explanation of Marketers' Scarcity Strategy , 2005, Manag. Sci..

[20]  E. Maskin,et al.  Monopoly with Incomplete Information , 1984 .

[21]  B. Wernerfelt,et al.  A Rational Reconstruction of the Compromise Effect: Using Market Data to Infer Utilities , 1995 .

[22]  R. Dhar Consumer Preference for a No-Choice Option , 1997 .

[23]  D. Prelec,et al.  The Role of Inference in Context Effects: Inferring What You Want from What Is Available , 1997 .

[24]  Dilli Raj,et al.  The Context , 2019, Enchanted Maidens.

[25]  Mark Armstrong,et al.  Competitive price discrimination , 2001 .

[26]  Christopher P. Puto,et al.  Adding Asymmetrically Dominated Alternatives: Violations of Regularity & the Similarity Hypothesis. , 1981 .

[27]  K. Moorthy Market Segmentation, Self-Selection, and Product Line Design , 1984 .

[28]  Karl T. Ulrich,et al.  Brand Equity and Vertical Product Line Extent , 1998 .

[29]  Hubert Gatignon,et al.  Optimal Product Line Pricing: The Influence of Elasticities and Cross-Elasticities , 1984 .

[30]  A. Sen,et al.  Maximization and the Act of Choice , 1997 .

[31]  S. Oren,et al.  Pricing a Product Line , 1984 .

[32]  Oded Netzer,et al.  Extending Compromise Effect Models to Complex Buying Situations and Other Context Effects , 2004 .

[33]  Sunil Gupta,et al.  The Shopping Basket: A Model for Multicategory Purchase Incidence Decisions , 1999 .

[34]  A. Tversky,et al.  Indifference Curves that Travel with the Choice Set , 2000 .

[35]  A. Tversky,et al.  Loss Aversion in Riskless Choice: A Reference-Dependent Model , 1991 .

[36]  Bruce G. S. Hardie,et al.  Modeling Loss Aversion and Reference Dependence Effects on Brand Choice , 1993 .

[37]  A. Chernev When More Is Less and Less Is More: the Role of Ideal Point Availability and Assortment in Consumer Choice This Research Argues That Choices from Different Size Assort- Ments Are a Function of the Degree to Which Consumers Have , 2022 .

[38]  Steven M. Shugan Product assortment in a triopolgy , 1989 .

[39]  Christopher K. Hsee,et al.  Will Products Look More Attractive When Presented Separately or Together? , 1998 .

[40]  J. Miguel Villas-Boas,et al.  Dynamic Competition with Customer Recognition , 1999 .

[41]  A. Tversky,et al.  Context-dependent preferences , 1993 .

[42]  John T. Gourville,et al.  Overchoice and Assortment Type: When and Why Variety Backfires , 2005 .

[43]  S. Rosen,et al.  Monopoly and product quality , 1978 .

[44]  Peter Boatwright,et al.  Reducing Assortment: An Attribute-Based Approach , 2001 .

[45]  A. Parducci Category judgment: a range-frequency model. , 1965, Psychological review.

[46]  Eric T. Bradlow,et al.  A Hierarchical Bayes Model for Assortment Choice , 2000 .

[47]  Preyas S. Desai Quality Segmentation in Spatial Markets: When Does Cannibalization Affect Product Line Design? , 2001 .

[48]  Emir Kamenica Contextual Inference in Markets: On the Informational Content of Product Lines , 2008 .

[49]  Ravi Dhar,et al.  Similarity in Context: Cognitive Representation and Violation of Preference and Perceptual Invariance in Consumer Choice☆ , 1996 .

[50]  K. Moorthy,et al.  Product and Price Competition in a Duopoly , 1988 .

[51]  V. Rao,et al.  A Balance Model for Evaluating Subsets of Multiattributed Items , 1976 .

[52]  A. Parducci Chapter 5 – CONTEXTUAL EFFECTS: A RANGE–FREQUENCY ANALYSIS* , 1974 .

[53]  D. Bell,et al.  Looking for Loss Aversion in Scanner Panel Data: The Confounding Effect of Price Response Heterogeneity , 2000 .

[54]  Steven M. Shugan Comments on "Pricing a Product Line." , 1984 .

[55]  R. Dolan Quantity Discounts: Managerial Issues and Research Opportunities , 1987 .

[56]  M. Lepper,et al.  The Construction of Preference: When Choice Is Demotivating: Can One Desire Too Much of a Good Thing? , 2006 .

[57]  Eric T. Anderson,et al.  Incorporating Behavioral Anomalies in Strategic Models , 2005 .