Personalized Stopping Rules in Bayesian Adaptive Mastery Assessment

We propose a new model to assess the mastery level of a given skill efficiently. The model, called Bayesian Adaptive Mastery Assessment (BAMA), uses information on the accuracy and the response time of the answers given and infers the mastery at every step of the assessment. BAMA balances the length of the assessment and the certainty of the mastery inference by employing a Bayesian decision-theoretic framework adapted to each student. All these properties contribute to a novel approach in assessment models for intelligent learning systems. The purpose of this research is to explore the properties of BAMA and evaluate its performance concerning the number of questions administered and the accuracy of the final mastery estimates across different students. We simulate student performances and establish that the model converges with low variance and high efficiency leading to shorter assessment duration for all students. Considering the experimental results, we expect our approach to avoid the issue of over-practicing and under-practicing and facilitate the development of Learning Analytics tools to support the tutors in the evaluation of learning effects and instructional decision making.

[1]  Radek Pelánek,et al.  Experimental Analysis of Mastery Learning Criteria , 2017, UMAP.

[2]  Young Cho,et al.  What is Bayesian Knowledge Tracing , 2018 .

[3]  Patrick C. Kyllonen,et al.  Use of Response Time for Measuring Cognitive Ability , 2016 .

[4]  Barbara G Dodd,et al.  A New Stopping Rule for Computerized Adaptive Testing , 2011, Educational and psychological measurement.

[5]  Markus H. Gross,et al.  When to stop?: towards universal instructional policies , 2016, LAK.

[6]  Alan Huebner,et al.  An Overview of Recent Developments in Cognitive Diagnostic Computer Adaptive Assessments. , 2010 .

[7]  Radek Pelánek Conceptual Issues in Mastery Criteria: Differentiating Uncertainty and Degrees of Knowledge , 2018, AIED.

[8]  S. Klinkenberg,et al.  Computer adaptive practice of Maths ability using a new item response model for on the fly ability and difficulty estimation , 2011, Comput. Educ..

[9]  Miss A.O. Penney (b) , 1974, The New Yale Book of Quotations.

[10]  Rose E. Stafford,et al.  Comparing computer adaptive testing stopping rules under the generalized partial-credit model , 2018, Behavior Research Methods.

[11]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Knowledge tracing: Modeling the acquisition of procedural knowledge , 2005, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[12]  Kathleen M. Sheehan,et al.  Using Bayesian Decision Theory to Design a Computerized Mastery Test , 1990 .

[13]  Emma Brunskill,et al.  The Impact on Individualizing Student Models on Necessary Practice Opportunities , 2012, EDM.

[14]  M. Jeon,et al.  An Overview of Models for Response Times and Processes in Cognitive Tests , 2019, Front. Psychol..

[15]  David George Glance,et al.  The pedagogical foundations of massive open online courses , 2013, First Monday.

[16]  Diego Reforgiato Recupero,et al.  Bridging learning analytics and Cognitive Computing for Big Data classification in micro-learning video collections , 2019, Comput. Hum. Behav..

[17]  Ryan Shaun Joazeiro de Baker,et al.  New Potentials for Data-Driven Intelligent Tutoring System Development and Optimization , 2013, AI Mag..

[18]  Sandjai Bhulai,et al.  Dynamic Knowledge Tracing Models for Large-Scale Adaptive Learning Environments , 2019 .

[19]  Leonidas J. Guibas,et al.  Deep Knowledge Tracing , 2015, NIPS.

[20]  Andrew J. Martin,et al.  Computer-Adaptive Testing: Implications for Students’ Achievement, Motivation, Engagement, and Subjective Test Experience , 2018 .

[21]  Yue Gong,et al.  Towards Detecting Wheel-Spinning: Future Failure in Mastery Learning , 2015, L@S.

[22]  Radek Pelanek,et al.  Applications of the Elo rating system in adaptive educational systems , 2016, Comput. Educ..

[23]  Peter Brusilovsky,et al.  General Features in Knowledge Tracing to Model Multiple Subskills, Temporal Item Response Theory, and Expert Knowledge , 2014, EDM.

[24]  Hahn-Ming Lee,et al.  Personalized e-learning system using Item Response Theory , 2005, Comput. Educ..

[25]  Radek Pelánek,et al.  Bayesian knowledge tracing, logistic models, and beyond: an overview of learner modeling techniques , 2017, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[26]  R. Ellis MEASURING IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT KNOWLEDGE OF A SECOND LANGUAGE: A Psychometric Study , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[27]  Radek Pelánek,et al.  Elo-based learner modeling for the adaptive practice of facts , 2017, User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction.

[28]  K. A. Ericsson,et al.  The Influence of Experience and Deliberate Practice on the Development of Superior Expert Performance , 2006 .

[29]  Angela J. Verschoor,et al.  Optimal Testing With Easy or Difficult Items in Computerized Adaptive Testing , 2006 .

[30]  Alexander G. Schwing,et al.  Dynamic Bayesian Networks for Student Modeling , 2017, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies.

[31]  Abe D. Hofman,et al.  Fast and slow strategies in multiplication , 2018, Learning and Individual Differences.

[32]  Hongchao Peng,et al.  Personalized adaptive learning: an emerging pedagogical approach enabled by a smart learning environment , 2019, Smart Learning Environments.

[33]  Zachary A Pardos,et al.  Big data in education and the models that love them , 2017, Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences.

[34]  Yun Huang,et al.  Your Model Is Predictive - but Is It Useful? Theoretical and Empirical Considerations of a New Paradigm for Adaptive Tutoring Evaluation , 2015, EDM.

[35]  J. Templin,et al.  Unique Characteristics of Diagnostic Classification Models: A Comprehensive Review of the Current State-of-the-Art , 2008 .

[36]  Emma Brunskill,et al.  From Predictive Models to Instructional Policies , 2015, EDM.

[37]  Z. Dienes,et al.  A theory of implicit and explicit knowledge , 1999, Behavioral and Brain Sciences.

[38]  Geoffray Bonnin,et al.  Modelling students' effort using behavioral data , 2019 .

[39]  John R. Anderson,et al.  Rules of the Mind , 1993 .

[40]  J. Ronald Gentile,et al.  Classroom Assessment and Grading to Assure Mastery , 2009 .

[41]  David J. Weiss,et al.  APPLICATION OF COMPUTERIZED ADAPTIVE TESTING TO EDUCATIONAL PROBLEMS , 1984 .

[42]  Mantz Yorke Formative assessment in higher education: Moves towards theory and the enhancement of pedagogic practice , 2003 .