Potential Of Crude Oil-degrading Bacteria To Co-resist Heavy Metals In Soil

The toxicity and adverse effects of crude oil pollution entail a quick clean-up using available competent technologies such as bioremediation. One factor affecting the bioremediation of crude oil is the presence of stressors such as heavy metals that halt the biodegradative potentials of the indigenous microbiota resulting in prolonged bioremediation and the accumulation of toxic hydrocarbons in the environment. Thus, it was considered sensible to investigate the potentials of the indigenous microbiota to resist the inhibitory effects of heavy metals (Al, Cd, Co, Hg and Ni) in soil. For this purpose, the tolerance of crude oil-degrading bacteria isolated from three different soils to heavy metals was investigated. Results demonstrated that bacteria isolated from the old crude oil-contaminated site and the recently heavy metal-contaminated construction sites that harbored high concentrations of heavy metals showed significantly (P0.05) higher tolerance to heavy metals compared to those isolated from pristine soil. Furthermore, longer co-existence of bacteria with heavy metals resulted in higher bacterial potentials to tolerate the inhibitory effects of heavy metals where the majority of the isolates exhibited multiple resistances to heavy metals especially to Co and Ni. However, all heavy metals tested, in particular, Hg, Co and Ni showed lethal effects at elevated concentrations.

[1]  M. Lertcanawanichakul,et al.  A Comparison of Two Methods Used for Measuring the Antagonistic Activity of Bacillus Species , 2011 .

[2]  Z. Yamani,et al.  Detection of heavy metals in Arabian crude oil residue using laser induced breakdown spectroscopy. , 2006, Talanta.

[3]  Guoqing Shen,et al.  Combined effect of heavy metals and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on urease activity in soil. , 2006, Ecotoxicology and environmental safety.

[4]  Qixing Zhou,et al.  Interaction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and heavy metals on soil enzyme. , 2005, Chemosphere.

[5]  E. Al-Saleh,et al.  Inhibition of hydrocarbon bioremediation by lead in a crude oil-contaminated soil , 2005 .

[6]  B. J. Alloway,et al.  Contamination of soils in domestic gardens and allotments: a brief overview , 2004 .

[7]  M. Britz,et al.  Detection of heavy metal ion resistance genes in Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria isolated from a lead-contaminated site , 2004, Biodegradation.

[8]  R. Maier,et al.  Impact of metals on the biodegradation of organic pollutants. , 2003, Environmental health perspectives.

[9]  Sylvia Daunert,et al.  Luminescence-based whole-cell-sensing systems for cadmium and lead using genetically engineered bacteria , 2003, Analytical and bioanalytical chemistry.

[10]  F. Schinner,et al.  Biodegradation and bioremediation of hydrocarbons in extreme environments , 2001, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[11]  M. Vidali Bioremediation. An overview , 2001 .

[12]  D. Nies,et al.  Microbial heavy-metal resistance , 1999, Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology.

[13]  S. Macnaughton,et al.  Effect of Toxic Metals on Indigenous Soil β-Subgroup Proteobacterium Ammonia Oxidizer Community Structure and Protection against Toxicity by Inoculated Metal-Resistant Bacteria , 1999, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[14]  N. Al-Awadhi,et al.  Bioremediation of oil-contaminated soil: microbiological methods for feasibility assessment and field evaluation , 1998 .

[15]  Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: A new , 1997 .

[16]  G. Cohen-bazire,et al.  Kinetic studies of pigment synthesis by non-sulfur purple bacteria. , 1957, Journal of cellular and comparative physiology.