Should environmental constraints be considered in linear programming based water value calculators?

Abstract We evaluate the practical usefulness of incorporating maximum ramping rates and minimum environmental flows into a linear programming based water value calculator for hydropower plants that participate in the day-ahead electricity market. The methodology consists of three steps: first computing the water value once with and once without environmental constraints, then simulating the plant operations using each water value, and finally comparing the simulation profits. A set of nine representative hydropower plants formed by combinations of three real locations (in Colombia, Norway and Spain) and three turbine configurations (from one to three Francis units) are individually analyzed. Each plant is simulated in two synthetic 10-year long series subject to fifteen combinations of maximum ramping rates and minimum flows with the two above-mentioned water values, totaling 540 simulations. The results indicate that incorporating the analyzed environmental constraints into a linear programming based water value calculator can be significantly profitable only when the hydropower plants have only one or at most two turbines.

[1]  John D. C. Little,et al.  The Use of Storage Water in a Hydroelectric System , 1955, Oper. Res..

[2]  P. Döll,et al.  High‐resolution mapping of the world's reservoirs and dams for sustainable river‐flow management , 2011 .

[3]  O. Nilsson,et al.  Variable splitting applied to modelling of start-up costs in short term hydro generation scheduling , 1997 .

[4]  Robert Leconte,et al.  Evaluating Transition Probabilities for a Stochastic Dynamic Programming Model Used in Water System Optimization , 2018 .

[5]  B. Mo,et al.  Assessing hydropower operational profitability considering energy and reserve markets , 2017 .

[6]  O. Nilsson,et al.  Hydro unit start-up costs and their impact on the short term scheduling strategies of Swedish power producers , 1997 .

[7]  Juan I. Pérez-Díaz,et al.  Approximate formulae for the assessment of the long-term economic impact of environmental constraints on hydropeaking , 2016 .

[8]  Peter H. Gleick,et al.  Environmental consequences of hydroelectric development: The role of facility size and type , 1992 .

[9]  E. Read,et al.  Modelling hydro reservoir operation in a deregulated electricity market , 1996 .

[10]  Y. Larsson,et al.  Incremental Cost of Water Power , 1961, Transactions of the American Institute of Electrical Engineers. Part III: Power Apparatus and Systems.

[11]  Silvano Martello,et al.  Piecewise linear approximation of functions of two variables in MILP models , 2010, Oper. Res. Lett..

[12]  Juan I. Pérez-Díaz,et al.  Influence of the Maximum Flow Ramping Rates on the Water Value , 2016 .

[13]  Juan I. Pérez-Díaz,et al.  The Influence of Environmental Constraints on the Water Value , 2016 .

[14]  Xiaohong Guan,et al.  Scheduling hydro power systems with restricted operating zones and discharge ramping constraints , 1999 .

[15]  M. E. El-Hawary,et al.  Optimal Economic Operation of Electric Power Systems , 2012 .

[16]  Birger Mo,et al.  Use of Parallel Processing in Applications for Hydro Power Scheduling – Current Status and Future Challenges , 2016 .

[17]  William W.-G. Yeh,et al.  Reservoir Management and Operations Models: A State‐of‐the‐Art Review , 1985 .

[18]  Peter Pruzan,et al.  From Control to Values-Based Management and Accountability , 1998 .

[19]  Claudia A. Sagastizábal,et al.  Divide to conquer: decomposition methods for energy optimization , 2012, Mathematical Programming.

[20]  R. Mcmanamay,et al.  Organizing Environmental Flow Frameworks to Meet Hydropower Mitigation Needs , 2016, Environmental Management.

[21]  Ian C. Goulter,et al.  Practical implications in the use of stochastic dynamic programming for reservoir operation , 1985 .

[22]  Juan I. Pérez-Díaz,et al.  Assessment of the economic impact of environmental constraints on short-term hydropower plant operation , 2010 .