Single-cell study links metabolism with nutrient signaling and reveals sources of variability

BackgroundThe yeast AMPK/SNF1 pathway is best known for its role in glucose de/repression. When glucose becomes limited, the Snf1 kinase is activated and phosphorylates the transcriptional repressor Mig1, which is then exported from the nucleus. The exact mechanism how the Snf1-Mig1 pathway is regulated is not entirely elucidated.ResultsGlucose uptake through the low affinity transporter Hxt1 results in nuclear accumulation of Mig1 in response to all glucose concentrations upshift, however with increasing glucose concentration the nuclear localization of Mig1 is more intense. Strains expressing Hxt7 display a constant response to all glucose concentration upshifts. We show that differences in amount of hexose transporter molecules in the cell could cause cell-to-cell variability in the Mig1-Snf1 system. We further apply mathematical modelling to our data, both general deterministic and a nonlinear mixed effect model. Our model suggests a presently unrecognized regulatory step of the Snf1-Mig1 pathway at the level of Mig1 dephosphorylation. Model predictions point to parameters involved in the transport of Mig1 in and out of the nucleus as a majorsource of cell to cell variability.ConclusionsWith this modelling approach we have been able to suggest steps that contribute to the cell-to-cell variability. Our data indicate a close link between the glucose uptake rate, which determines the glycolytic rate, and the activity of the Snf1/Mig1 system. This study hence establishes a close relation between metabolism and signalling.

[1]  J. Berden,et al.  Growth and Glucose Repression Are Controlled by Glucose Transport in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Cells Containing Only One Glucose Transporter , 1999, Journal of bacteriology.

[2]  Carl Johan Franzén,et al.  Characterization of glucose transport mutants of Saccharomyces cerevisiae during a nutritional upshift reveals a correlation between metabolite levels and glycolytic flux. , 2008, FEMS yeast research.

[3]  R. McCartney,et al.  β‐subunits of Snf1 kinase are required for kinase function and substrate definition , 2000, The EMBO journal.

[4]  Kyu Hong Cho,et al.  Glucose starvation-induced turnover of the yeast glucose transporter Hxt1. , 2014, Biochimica et biophysica acta.

[5]  Michael B. Elowitz,et al.  Pulsatile Dynamics in the Yeast Proteome , 2014, Current Biology.

[6]  Meike T. Wortel,et al.  Lost in Transition: Start-Up of Glycolysis Yields Subpopulations of Nongrowing Cells , 2014, Science.

[7]  Pilar Herrero,et al.  The Nuclear Hexokinase 2 Acts as a Glucose Sensor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2016, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[8]  Sabrina L Spencer,et al.  Non-genetic Cell-to-cell Variability and the Consequences for Pharmacology This Review Comes from a Themed Issue on Omics Edited the Distribution of Protein Abundance and Resulting Variability in Phenotype Measuring Cell-to-cell Variation , 2022 .

[9]  David Carling,et al.  ADP Regulates SNF1, the Saccharomyces cerevisiae Homolog of AMP-Activated Protein Kinase , 2011, Cell metabolism.

[10]  J. Gancedo Yeast Carbon Catabolite Repression , 1998, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[11]  R. McCartney,et al.  Ligand Binding to the AMP-activated Protein Kinase Active Site Mediates Protection of the Activation Loop from Dephosphorylation* , 2012, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[12]  J. Thevelein,et al.  Nutrient sensing and signaling in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2014, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[13]  E. Boles,et al.  Kinetic characterization of individual hexose transporters of Saccharomyces cerevisiae and their relation to the triggering mechanisms of glucose repression. , 1997, European journal of biochemistry.

[14]  M. Peter,et al.  Scalable inference of heterogeneous reaction kinetics from pooled single-cell recordings , 2013, Nature Methods.

[15]  L E Friberg,et al.  A Review of Mixed-Effects Models of Tumor Growth and Effects of Anticancer Drug Treatment Used in Population Analysis , 2014, CPT: pharmacometrics & systems pharmacology.

[16]  M. Carlson,et al.  Snf1 Protein Kinase Regulates Phosphorylation of the Mig1 Repressor in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1998, Molecular and Cellular Biology.

[17]  R. McCartney,et al.  Subunit and Domain Requirements for Adenylate-mediated Protection of Snf1 Kinase Activation Loop from Dephosphorylation* , 2011, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[18]  Gunnar Cedersund,et al.  Nonlinear mixed-effects modelling for single cell estimation: when, why, and how to use it , 2015, BMC Systems Biology.

[19]  David Carling,et al.  Structure of Mammalian AMPK and its regulation by ADP , 2011, Nature.

[20]  C. Hollenberg,et al.  Catabolite inactivation of the high‐affinity hexose transporters Hxt6 and Hxt7 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae occurs in the vacuole after internalization by endocytosis 1 , 1998, FEBS letters.

[21]  Mikael Käll,et al.  Image analysis algorithms for cell contour recognition in budding yeast. , 2008, Optics express.

[22]  Pilar Herrero,et al.  Hexokinase 2 Is an Intracellular Glucose Sensor of Yeast Cells That Maintains the Structure and Activity of Mig1 Protein Repressor Complex* , 2016, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[23]  Mark Johnston,et al.  Function and Regulation of Yeast Hexose Transporters , 1999, Microbiology and Molecular Biology Reviews.

[24]  Marija Cvijovic,et al.  Yeast AMP-activated Protein Kinase Monitors Glucose Concentration Changes and Absolute Glucose Levels* , 2014, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[25]  J. Gancedo,et al.  The early steps of glucose signalling in yeast. , 2008, FEMS microbiology reviews.

[26]  Edda Klipp,et al.  Modelling of signal transduction in yeast – sensitivity and model analysis , 2006 .

[27]  Eva Balsa-Canto,et al.  AMIGO, a toolbox for advanced model identification in systems biology using global optimization , 2011, Bioinform..

[28]  F. Bruggeman,et al.  Single yeast cells vary in transcription activity not in delay time after a metabolic shift , 2014, Nature Communications.

[29]  Olaf Wolkenhauer,et al.  Glucose de‐repression by yeast AMP‐activated protein kinase SNF1 is controlled via at least two independent steps , 2014, The FEBS journal.

[30]  Edda Klipp,et al.  Modelling the dynamics of the yeast pheromone pathway , 2004, Yeast.

[31]  J. Broach Nutritional Control of Growth and Development in Yeast , 2012, Genetics.

[32]  Mattias Goksör,et al.  A microfluidic device for reversible environmental changes around single cells using optical tweezers for cell selection and positioning. , 2010, Lab on a chip.

[33]  Jacky L. Snoep,et al.  Role of Hexose Transport in Control of Glycolytic Flux in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2004, Applied and Environmental Microbiology.

[34]  Michael B. Elowitz,et al.  Combinatorial gene regulation by modulation of relative pulse timing , 2015, Nature.

[35]  R. McCartney,et al.  Reg1 Protein Regulates Phosphorylation of All Three Snf1 Isoforms but Preferentially Associates with the Gal83 Isoform , 2011, Eukaryotic Cell.

[36]  Stefan Hohmann,et al.  Transcriptional responses to glucose at different glycolytic rates in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2004, European journal of biochemistry.

[37]  C T Verrips,et al.  Glucose Repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae Is Related to the Glucose Concentration Rather Than the Glucose Flux* , 1998, The Journal of Biological Chemistry.

[38]  Ravi Iyengar,et al.  Modeling Signaling Networks , 2002, Science.

[39]  C. Snowdon,et al.  Regulation of Hxt3 and Hxt7 Turnover Converges on the Vid30 Complex and Requires Inactivation of the Ras/cAMP/PKA Pathway in Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 2012, PloS one.

[40]  M. Swanson,et al.  A yeast heterogeneous nuclear ribonucleoprotein complex associated with RNA polymerase II. , 2000, Genetics.

[41]  M. Carlson,et al.  The Snf1 protein kinase and its activating subunit, Snf4, interact with distinct domains of the Sip1/Sip2/Gal83 component in the kinase complex , 1997, Molecular and cellular biology.

[42]  Edda Klipp,et al.  Modelling dynamic processes in yeast , 2007, Yeast.

[43]  Mattias Goksör,et al.  A Nonlinear Mixed Effects Approach for Modeling the Cell-To-Cell Variability of Mig1 Dynamics in Yeast , 2015, PloS one.

[44]  C. Snowdon,et al.  Components of the Vid30c are needed for the rapamycin-induced degradation of the high-affinity hexose transporter Hxt7p in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. , 2008, FEMS yeast research.

[45]  E. Klipp,et al.  Mathematical modeling of intracellular signaling pathways , 2006, BMC Neuroscience.

[46]  K. Entian,et al.  Glucose repression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae is directly associated with hexose phosphorylation by hexokinases PI and PII. , 1991, European journal of biochemistry.

[47]  Mark Johnston,et al.  The nuclear exportin Msn5 is required for nuclear export of the Mig1 glucose repressor of Saccharomyces cerevisiae , 1999, Current Biology.

[48]  E. Klipp,et al.  Integrative model of the response of yeast to osmotic shock , 2005, Nature Biotechnology.

[49]  Mattias Goksör,et al.  CellStress - open source image analysis program for single-cell analysis , 2010, NanoScience + Engineering.

[50]  J. Raser,et al.  Control of Stochasticity in Eukaryotic Gene Expression , 2004, Science.