The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis.

BACKGROUND Negative appendectomy (NA)--the nonincidental removal of a normal appendix--occurs commonly but the associated clinical- and system-level costs are not well studied. HYPOTHESIS The frequency of adverse clinical outcomes and associated financial burden of hospitalizations during which NA is performed is greater than previously recognized and varies widely among demographic groups. DESIGN Population-based, retrospective cohort study. SETTING The 1997 Nationwide Inpatient Sample of the Health Care Utilization Project. PATIENTS All surveyed patients assigned International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision procedure codes for appendectomy but without an associated diagnosis of acute appendicitis. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES The age- and sex-stratified rates of NA, the incidence of associated infectious complications and case fatality, and the average length of stay and hospitalization charges during those admissions. RESULTS Nationwide, an estimated 261 134 patients underwent nonincidental appendectomies in 1997, and 39 901 (15.3%) were negative for appendicitis. Women had a higher rate of NA as did patients younger than 5 years and older than 60 years. When compared with patients with appendicitis, NA was associated with a significantly longer length of stay (5.8 vs 3.6 days, P<.001), total charge-admission ($18 780 vs $10 584, P<.001), case fatality rate (1.5% vs 0.2%, P<.001), and rate of infectious complications (2.6% vs 1.8%, P<.001). An estimated $741.5 million in total hospital charges resulted from admissions in which a NA was performed. CONCLUSIONS There are significant clinical and financial costs incurred by patients undergoing NA during the treatment of presumed appendicitis. These should be considered when evaluating system-level interventions to improve the management of appendicitis.

[1]  M. Nipper,et al.  Computed tomography and ultrasonography in the diagnosis of appendicitis: when are they indicated? , 2001, Archives of surgery.

[2]  R. Satava,et al.  Balancing the normal appendectomy rate with the perforated appendicitis rate: implications for quality assurance. , 1992, The American surgeon.

[3]  R. Deyo,et al.  Adapting a clinical comorbidity index for use with ICD-9-CM administrative databases. , 1992, Journal of clinical epidemiology.

[4]  H. Ho,et al.  Computed tomography and ultrasonography do not improve and may delay the diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. , 2001, Archives of surgery.

[5]  C. Ohmann,et al.  Perforating appendicitis: is it a separate disease? Acute Abdominal Pain Study Group. , 1999, The European journal of surgery = Acta chirurgica.

[6]  R. Tauxe,et al.  The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. , 1990, American journal of epidemiology.

[7]  H. Körner,et al.  Incidence of Acute Nonperforated and Perforated Appendicitis: Age-specific and Sex-specific Analysis , 1997, World Journal of Surgery.

[8]  D. Flum,et al.  Has misdiagnosis of appendicitis decreased over time? A population-based analysis. , 2001, JAMA.

[9]  C. Ohmann,et al.  Perforating Appendicitis: is it a Separate Disease? , 1999 .

[10]  D. Dent,et al.  Appendicitis: Why So Complicated? Analysis of 5755 Consecutive Appendectomies , 2000, The American surgeon.

[11]  D. Margel,et al.  Appendicitis in the elderly: what has changed? , 2000, The Israel Medical Association journal : IMAJ.

[12]  Soumitra R. Eachempati,et al.  Interpretation of computed tomography does not correlate with laboratory or pathologic findings in surgically confirmed acute appendicitis. , 2000, Surgery.

[13]  D W Rattner,et al.  Introduction of appendiceal CT: impact on negative appendectomy and appendiceal perforation rates. , 1999, Annals of surgery.

[14]  G. Dunnington,et al.  High negative appendectomy rates are no longer acceptable. , 1997, American journal of surgery.