Assessing social and economic impacts associated with changes in the coal mining industry in the Bowen Basin, Queensland, Australia

Purpose – The coal mining industry makes a key contribution to the Queensland economy, and is the underlying driver of employment and economic conditions in many local and regional communities. This article aims to focus on how the social and economic impacts of mining should be assessed and negotiated with local and regional communities.Design/methodology/approach – The following assessment tools were trialed to ascertain the impacts on communities of changes in the mining industry: extended stakeholder analysis of key community representatives; economic modeling of changes in the level of mining activity; a random survey of householders involving choice experiments to assess tradeoffs; and experimental workshops to assess how residents were prepared to prioritise different community development options.Findings – The results showed that impact assessment should be addressed using different economic and social science tools to ensure regulatory approval as well as community acceptance.Originality/value –...

[1]  J. Louviere,et al.  Stated Preference Approaches for Measuring Passive Use Values: Choice Experiments and Contingent Valuation , 1998 .

[2]  John Rolfe,et al.  Diversification Choices in Agriculture: A Choice Modelling Case Study of Sugarcane Growers , 2005 .

[3]  J. Bennett,et al.  Estimating Society's Willingness to Pay to Maintain Viable Rural Communities , 2004 .

[4]  John Rolfe,et al.  Designing experiments to test auction procedures , 2004 .

[5]  Stewart Lockie,et al.  SIA in review: setting the agenda for impact assessment in the 21st century , 2001 .

[6]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  Choice modelling and its potential application to tropical rainforest preservation , 2000 .

[7]  Per Capita,et al.  About the authors , 1995, Machine Vision and Applications.

[8]  John Rolfe,et al.  Using Field Experiments to Explore the Use of Multiple Bidding Rounds in Conservation Auctions , 2006 .

[9]  J. W. Bennett,et al.  THE USE OF POLICY LABELS IN ENVIRONMENTAL CHOICE MODELLING STUDIES , 2022 .

[10]  J. Bennett,et al.  The choice modelling approach to environmental valuation , 2001 .

[11]  John M. Rose,et al.  Applied Choice Analysis: A Primer , 2005 .

[12]  Judith Petts,et al.  Handbook of environmental impact assessment , 1999 .

[13]  Jayson L. Lusk,et al.  Willingness‐to‐Pay Estimates and Their Relevance to Agribusiness Decision Making , 2004 .

[14]  Donna Craig,et al.  Social impact assessment: Politically oriented approaches and applications , 1990 .

[15]  Allan Dale,et al.  SOCIAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT IN QUEENSLAND: WHY PRACTICE LAGS BEHIND LEGISLATIVE OPPORTUNITY , 1997 .

[16]  Peter H. Fricke,et al.  Guidelines and principles for social impact assessment , 1995 .

[17]  John Rolfe,et al.  Valuing the Protection of Aboriginal Cultural Heritage Sites , 2003 .

[18]  John Formby,et al.  THE POLITICS OF ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT ASSESSMENT , 1990 .

[19]  J. Petts,et al.  Handbook of environmental impact assessment. Volume 1: environmental impact assessment: process, methods and potential. , 1999 .

[20]  Allan Dale,et al.  Strategic perspectives analysis: A procedure for participatory and political social impact assessment , 1994 .

[21]  Jordan J. Louviere,et al.  A test of policy labels in environmental choice modelling studies , 2000 .

[22]  Jeffrey Bennett,et al.  Choice Modelling, Non-Use Values and Benefit Transfer , 2000 .

[23]  Frank Vanclay,et al.  International Principles For Social Impact Assessment , 2003 .

[24]  John Rolfe,et al.  Social and economic issues associated with the Bowen Basin coal industry community engagement to reduce conflict over mine operations , 2005 .