The Evaluation of the Finnish National Innovation System - Full Report

The Finnish National Innovation System has been evaluated by international experts. Its starting point was the Government´s Communication on Finland´s National Innovation Strategy to the Parliament, which included the policy guidelines with respect to the development and renewal of Finnish innovation policy. The aim of the evaluation was to provide insights into how the National Innovation System, its structure and organizations can respond to the changes in the global environment and to the challenges these changes pose. The international evaluation experts have identified modes of operation, processes and tools, that the Finnish innovation policy can be designed and implemented with. The grass-root level evaluation provides means of generating better innovations and facilitating their adoption and diffusion. A specific challenge in the promotion of innovative activities is the inclusion of the creativity and expertise of individuals and communities. The new demand- and user-driven innovation policy emphasizes the needs of customers in developing products and services, the systematic use of economic incentives and the participation of end-users in the innovation process. The future challenges – such as the globalizing economy and its first global recession, the structural change of Finnish industries, aging of population, and climate change – can be addressed by facilitating interaction between different ministries and other actors, and by introducing a broad-based and efficient public innovation policy.

[1]  J. Fagerberg,et al.  The Oxford handbook of innovation , 2006 .

[2]  A. Kangasharju,et al.  Increasing Regional Disparities in the 1990s: The Finnish Experience , 2004 .

[3]  Mika Maliranta,et al.  Tuottavuuden mittaaminen: Suomi kansainvälisessä vertailussa , 2008 .

[4]  Paul Krugman,et al.  A Country Is Not a Company , 2009 .

[5]  M. Maliranta,et al.  When Do Employees Leave Their Job for Entrepreneurship? , 2008 .

[6]  Christian Keuschnigg,et al.  Start-Ups, Venture Capitalists and the Capital Gains Tax , 2002, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[7]  Andrea Bassanini,et al.  Knowledge, Technology and Economic Growth: Recent Evidence from OECD Countries , 2000 .

[8]  Terttu Luukkonen,et al.  Living up to the Expectations Set by ICT? The Case of Biotechnology Commercialisation in Finland , 2007, Technol. Anal. Strateg. Manag..

[9]  K. Aiginger,et al.  Globalization and Business - Innovation in a Borderless World Economy , 2009 .

[10]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  Science, Technology and Innovation for Economic Growth: Linking Policy Research and Practice in "STIG Systems" , 2009 .

[11]  E. Rogers,et al.  Diffusion of Innovations , 1964 .

[12]  S. Shane Why encouraging more people to become entrepreneurs is bad public policy , 2009 .

[13]  J. H. Comroe,et al.  Retrospectroscope: Insights into Medical Discovery , 1977 .

[14]  J. Stokes The university department. , 1974, Science.

[15]  John A. Pearce,et al.  The need for innovation as a rationale for government involvement in entrepreneurship , 2009 .

[16]  Anssi Rantala GROWTH OF NEW FIRMS: EVIDENCE FROM FINLAND 1996-2003 , 2006 .

[17]  Elias Einiö The effect of government subsidies on private R&D: evidence from geographic variation in support program funding , 2009 .

[18]  Markku Sotarauta,et al.  Co-Evolutionary Policy Processes: Understanding Innovative Economies and Future Resilience , 2006 .

[19]  Jonathan Potter Entrepreneurship and Higher Education. , 2008 .

[20]  R. L. Jensen,et al.  Effects on academia-industry collaboration of extending university property rights , 2007 .

[21]  K. Aiginger The Swedish Economic Model: lessons to be learned , 2008 .

[22]  Karl Aiginger,et al.  Evaluation of Government Funding in RTDI from a Systems Perspective in Austria. Synthesis Report , 2009 .

[23]  Hayagreeva Rao,et al.  Overcoming Resource Constraints on Product Innovation by Recruiting Talent From Rivals: A Study of the Mutual Fund Industry, 1986–1994 , 2002 .

[24]  J. Lane,et al.  The Public Sector , 1996 .

[25]  J. Poterba CAPITAL GAINS TAX POLICY TOWARD ENTREPRENEURSHIP , 1989, National Tax Journal.

[26]  P. Aghion,et al.  Distance to Frontier, Selection, and Economic Growth , 2002 .

[27]  Axel Dreher,et al.  Does globalization affect growth? Evidence from a new index of globalization , 2006 .

[28]  Xavier Castañer,et al.  Strategic Planning as an Integrative Device , 2004 .

[29]  Sascha O. Becker,et al.  Offshoring and the Onshore Composition of Tasks and Skills , 2009 .

[30]  Mary O'Mahony,et al.  Output, Input and Productivity Measures at the Industry Level: The EU KLEMS Database , 2009 .

[31]  Charles Edquist,et al.  Systems of innovation perspectives and challenges , 2004 .

[32]  Bruno Cassiman,et al.  Optimal Project Rejection and New Firm Start-Ups , 2002, Manag. Sci..

[33]  Mikko Ketokivi,et al.  Elaborating the Contingency Theory of Organizations: The Case of Manufacturing Flexibility Strategies , 2006 .

[34]  M. Kamien,et al.  Market structure and innovation , 1982 .

[35]  Outi Kröger,et al.  Osakkeiden normaalituoton verovapaus: Norjan osakeverotuksen malli , 2009 .

[36]  R. Baldwin,et al.  Heterogeneous Firms, Agglomeration and Economic Geography: Spatial Selection and Sorting , 2005 .

[37]  D. Cumming,et al.  The Legislative Road to Silicon Valley , 2006 .

[38]  Markku V. J. Maula,et al.  Transferability of the Venture Capital Model to the Corporate Context: Implications for the Performance of Corporate Venture Units , 2009 .

[39]  Tanja Tanayama,et al.  Evaluating Innovation Policy: A Structural Treatment Effect Model of R&D Subsidies , 2008 .

[40]  Joaquim Oliveira Martins,et al.  The Policy Determinants of Investment in Tertiary Education , 2010 .

[41]  J. Schumpeter,et al.  The Theory of Economic Development , 2017 .

[42]  Liisa Välikangas,et al.  The quest for resilience. , 2003, Harvard business review.

[43]  Arvids A. Ziedonis,et al.  Academic patent quality and quantity before and after the Bayh-Dole act in the United States , 2002 .

[44]  Michael A. Heller,et al.  The Gridlock Economy: How Too Much Ownership Wrecks Markets, Stops Innovation, and Costs Lives , 2008 .

[45]  Markku V. J. Maula,et al.  Public Financing of Young Innovative Companies in Finland , 2007 .

[46]  M. Heller,et al.  Can Patents Deter Innovation? The Anticommons in Biomedical Research , 1998, Science.

[47]  M. Polanyi Personal Knowledge: Towards a post-critical philosophy , 1959 .

[48]  D. Audretsch,et al.  Does Entrepreneurship Capital Matter? , 2004 .

[49]  M. Kenney,et al.  Technology, entrepreneurship and path dependence: industrial clustering in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1999 .

[50]  K. Aiginger The Swedish Economic Model , 2007 .

[51]  Richard E. Baldwin,et al.  Globalisation: the great unbundling(s) , 2006 .

[52]  C. Keuschnigg,et al.  A growth oriented dual income tax , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[53]  Mika Maliranta,et al.  The micro-level dynamics of regional productivity growth: The source of divergence in Finland , 2007 .

[54]  Astrid Szogs,et al.  A system of innovation? Biomass digestion technology in Tanzania. , 2008 .

[55]  Markku V. J. Maula,et al.  Attracting cross-border venture capital: the role of a local investor , 2008 .

[56]  Charles E. Eesley,et al.  Entrepreneurial Impact: The Role of MIT , 2009 .

[57]  B. Lundvall,et al.  Forms of knowledge and modes of innovation , 2007 .

[58]  Joanne L. Martin,et al.  A Retrospective , 1988 .

[59]  M. Frese,et al.  Entrepreneurial Orientation and Business Performance: An Assessment of past Research and Suggestions for the Future , 2009 .

[60]  Bj⊘rn Asheim,et al.  Constructing knowledge-based regional advantage: Implications for regional innovation policy , 2007 .

[61]  Daron Acemoglu,et al.  Productivity Gains from Unemployment Insurance , 1999 .

[62]  Michael P. Devereux,et al.  Visible . A Service of zbw , 1999 .

[63]  C. Edquist Design of innovation policy through diagnostic analysis: identification of systemic problems (or failures) , 2011 .

[64]  A. V. D. Ven,et al.  Central problems in the management of innovation , 1986 .

[65]  T. Loikkanen,et al.  Going Global: The Challenges for Knowledge-based Economies , 2008 .

[66]  P. Vujakovic How to Measure Globalisation? A New Globalisation Index (NGI) , 2009 .

[67]  Antti-Jussi Tahvanainen Yliopistollinen teknologiansiirto muutosten pyörteissä. Näkemyksiä SHOK korkeakoulukeksintölain ja yliopistolain vaikutuksista tutkimus- ja innovaatiotoimintaan , 2009 .

[68]  Tuomo Nikulainen,et al.  Evaluating National Innovation Systems - Key Insights from the Finnish Innoeval Survey , 2009 .

[69]  David B. Audretsch,et al.  The Dynamic Role of Small Firms: Evidence from the U.S , 2002 .

[70]  Liisa Välikangas,et al.  Extending the boundary of corporate innovation , 2002 .

[71]  Risto Heiskala,et al.  Social innovations, institutional change and economic performance : making sense of structural adjustment processes in industrial sectors, regions and societies , 2007 .

[72]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Simple Economics of Open Source , 2000 .

[73]  R. Harrison,et al.  Closing the Regional Equity Gap? A Critique of the Department of Trade and Industry's Regional Venture Capital Funds Initiative , 2003 .

[74]  Shaker A. Zahra,et al.  The effect of governance modes and relatedness of external business development activities on innovative performance , 2008 .

[75]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  On Young Highly Innovative Companies: Why They Matter and How (Not) to Policy Support Them , 2010 .

[76]  C. Palmberg,et al.  ALLIANCE CAPITALISM AND THE INTERNATIONALISATION OF FINNISH FIRMS , 2005 .

[77]  Josh Lerner,et al.  The Financing of R&D and Innovation , 2009 .

[78]  Sergio L. Schmukler,et al.  Emerging Market Instability : Do Sovereign Ratings Affect Country Risk and Stock Returns ? , 1997 .

[79]  Claire E. Crawford,et al.  Small Business Taxation , 2010 .

[80]  Markku V. J. Maula,et al.  Exploration, exploitation, and financial performance: analysis of S&P 500 corporations , 2009 .

[81]  G. Avnimelech,et al.  Creating venture capital industries that co-evolve with high tech: Insights from an extended industry life cycle perspective of the Israeli experience , 2006 .

[82]  R. Nelson National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis , 1993 .

[83]  Alessandro Sembenelli,et al.  Public Policy and the Creation of Active Venture Capital Markets , 2005 .

[84]  Boyan Jovanovic,et al.  Demand-Driven Innovation and Spatial Competition Over Time , 1987 .

[85]  Gianmarco I.P. Ottaviano,et al.  Market potential and productivity: Evidence from Finnish regions , 2006 .

[86]  Mikko Kosonen,et al.  Fast Strategy: How Strategic Agility Will Help You Stay Ahead of the Game , 2008 .

[87]  J. Tremblay,et al.  Public Economics and Startup Entrepreneurs , 2003, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[88]  Markku Sotarauta,et al.  Co-evolution of the Finnish National and Local Innovation and Science Arenas: Towards a Dynamic Understanding of Multi-level Governance , 2007 .

[89]  Leif Hommen,et al.  Comparing national systems of innovation in Asia and Europe: theory and comparative framework , 2008 .

[90]  H. Chesbrough Business Model Innovation: Opportunities and Barriers , 2010 .

[91]  J. Haltiwanger,et al.  Aggregate Productivity Growth: Lessons from Microeconomic Evidence , 1998 .

[92]  Richard Florida,et al.  The globalization of R&D: Results of a survey of foreign-affiliated R&D laboratories in the USA , 1997 .

[93]  C. Edquist,et al.  Systems of Innovation : Theory and Policy for the Demand Side , 1999 .

[94]  Risto Heiskala,et al.  Social innovations, institutional change and economic performance : making sense of structural adjustment processes in industrial sectors, regions and societies , 2007 .

[95]  D. Audretsch,et al.  Globalization and the Rise of the Entrepreneurial Economy , 2007 .

[96]  A. Kangasharju,et al.  Tax competition among municipalities in Finland , 2006 .

[97]  Mika Pajarinen,et al.  Large Corporations in the Finnish Economy , 2008 .

[98]  Reinhilde Veugelers,et al.  Education, Research, and the Economy , 2009 .

[99]  K. Aiginger,et al.  The ability to adapt: Why it differs between the Scandinavian and Continental European models , 2006 .

[100]  Gordon Murray,et al.  Why has the investment performance of technology-specialist, European venture capital funds been so poor? , 1998 .

[101]  K. Aiginger The Use of Unit Values to Discriminate between Price and Quality Competition , 1997 .

[102]  M. Hannan,et al.  Structural Inertia and Organizational Change , 1984 .

[103]  Alex Rialp,et al.  The phenomenon of early internationalizing firms: what do we know after a decade (1993-2003) of scientific inquiry? , 2005 .

[104]  Paul Israel,et al.  The Sources of Innovation , 1990 .

[105]  Gavin Cassar Entrepreneur Opportunity Costs and Intended Venture Growth , 2006 .

[106]  Magnus Henrekson,et al.  Gazelles as job creators: a survey and interpretation of the evidence , 2010 .

[107]  Philippe Aghion,et al.  The Economics of Growth , 2008 .

[108]  Rebecca Zarutskie,et al.  The Role of Top Management Team Human Capital in Venture Capital Markets: Evidence from First-Time Funds , 2008 .

[109]  J. Johanson,et al.  The Internationalization Process of the Firm—A Model of Knowledge Development and Increasing Foreign Market Commitments , 1977 .

[110]  Osmo Kuusi,et al.  Innovation Systems and Competitiveness , 1996 .

[111]  Gordon C. Murray,et al.  The International Market Entry Choices of Start-Up Companies in High-Technology Industries , 2000 .

[112]  D. Mowery,et al.  Technology and the pursuit of economic growth , 1991 .

[113]  Vesa Kanniainen YRITTÄJYYDEN JA YRITYSTEN VEROKANNUSTIMET , 2006 .

[114]  Eric von Hippel,et al.  A Customer-active Paradigm for Industrial Product Idea Generation , 1978 .

[115]  J. Edler Demand Policies for Innovation in EU CEE Countries , 2009 .

[116]  C. Edquist,et al.  Thematic Review of Tertiary Education: Poland , 2007 .

[117]  Ari Hyytinen,et al.  Where Do Financial Constraints Originate from? An Empirical Analysis of Adverse Selection and Moral Hazard in Capital Markets , 2006 .

[118]  R. Veugelers,et al.  Licensing of University Inventions: The Role of a Technology Transfer Office , 2007 .

[119]  Jacob Schmookler,et al.  Invention and Economic Growth , 1967 .

[120]  Kevin J. Fox,et al.  On Measuring the Contribution of Entering and Exiting Firms to Aggregate Productivity Growth , 2005 .

[121]  Luke Georghiou,et al.  Evaluation of the Finnish innovation support system , 2003 .

[122]  J. Richard,et al.  Exploiting Non-Linearities in GDP Growth for Forecasting and Anticipating Regime Changes , 2008 .

[123]  Susan E. Woodward,et al.  The Burden of the Nondiversifiable Risk of Entrepreneurship , 2008 .

[124]  Dan Breznitz Innovation and the State , 2007 .

[125]  Koenraad Debackere,et al.  The Role of Academic Technology Transfer Organizations in Improving Industry Science Links , 2005 .

[126]  Clayton M. Christensen The Innovator's Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail , 2013 .

[127]  Jorma Lievonen,et al.  THE ROLE OF INNOVATION POLICY IN FOSTERING OPEN INNOVATION ACTIVITIES AMONG COMPANIES , 2008 .

[128]  D. Dimov,et al.  Determinants of the Incidence and Scale of Seed Capital Investments by Venture Capital Firms , 2008 .

[129]  Johannes Van Biesebroeck,et al.  Productivity Dynamics with Technology Choice: An Application to Automobile Assembly , 2003 .

[130]  David C. Mowery,et al.  Universities in National Innovation Systems , 2006 .

[131]  Martin Kenney,et al.  Reconsidering the Bayh-Dole Act and the Current University Invention Ownership Model , 2009 .

[132]  Timothy B. Folta,et al.  Geographic cluster size and firm performance , 2006 .

[133]  Mita Bhattacharya,et al.  Determinants of Innovation , 2004 .

[134]  David J. Storey,et al.  Public Policy Measures to Support New Technology-Based Firms in the European Union , 1998 .

[135]  K. Arrow Economic Welfare and the Allocation of Resources for Invention , 1962 .

[136]  Tarantola Stefano,et al.  European Innovation Scoreboard 2006 - Comparative Analysis of Innovation Performance , 2007 .

[137]  E. Hippel,et al.  User Innovation in SMEs: Incidence and Transfer to Producers , 2008 .

[138]  Matthias Deschryvere,et al.  High growth firms and job creation in Finland , 2008 .

[139]  C. Edquist Systems of Innovation: Technologies, Institutions and Organizations , 1997 .

[140]  Antti-Jussi Tahvanainen Finnish university technology transfer in a whirl of changes: A brief summary , 2009 .

[141]  Ron S. Jarmin,et al.  The Spread of ICT and Productivity Growth: Is Europe Really Lagging Behind in the New Economy? , 2002 .

[142]  Steven N. Durlauf,et al.  Commission on Growth and Development , 2007 .

[143]  V. Kanniainen,et al.  Nordic dual income taxation of entrepreneurs , 2005, SSRN Electronic Journal.

[144]  S. Shane,et al.  The Promise of Entrepreneurship as a Field of Research , 2000 .

[145]  P. Santiago,et al.  Tertiary education for the knowledge society , 2008 .

[146]  P. H. Friesen,et al.  A Longitudinal Study of the Corporate Life Cycle , 1984 .

[147]  Mary Hilson,et al.  The Nordic Model , 2008 .

[148]  P. Sørensen Dual Income Taxes: A Nordic Tax System , 2009 .

[149]  Jakob Edler Demand-Based Innovation Policy , 2010 .

[150]  A. Chandler,et al.  Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route 128 , 1994 .

[151]  J. Schumpeter Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy , 1943 .

[152]  Pim Martens,et al.  Measuring Globalisation: Gauging Its Consequences , 2008 .

[153]  Markku V. J. Maula,et al.  Finnish Industry Investment Ltd: An International Evaluation , 2003 .

[154]  Albert N. Link,et al.  The economics of intellectual property at universities: an overview of the special issue , 2003 .

[155]  S. Winter,et al.  In search of useful theory of innovation , 1993 .

[156]  R. Veugelers The Role of SMEs in Innovation in the EU. A Case for Policy Intervention , 2008 .

[157]  Seppo Kari,et al.  Investment Incentives in Closely Held Corporations and Finland' s 2005 Tax Reform * , 2006 .

[158]  M. Tushman,et al.  Readings in the Management of Innovation , 1988 .

[159]  M. Porter Clusters and the new economics of competition. , 1998, Harvard business review.

[160]  David J. Storey,et al.  Financial constraints on the growth of high technology small firms in the United Kingdom , 1997 .

[161]  E. Autio,et al.  High-Growth SME Support Initiatives in Nine Countries: Analysis, Categorization, and Recommendations , 2007 .