Increasing the Performance of Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzer Operating in Neutral pH

Anion exchange membrane water electrolysis (AEMWE) for generation of hydrogen from water is an emerging technology with high potential to surpass peer electrolyzers. However, current AEMWEs exhibit significant overpotential loss. Almost all the reported improvements in AEMWE performance have been confined to development and optimization of the conductive membranes and active electrodes to address issues regarding the ohmic and activation loss in AEMWE. However, coming from a different perspective, the strong effect of other cell components, which directly influence interfacial contact and transport phenomenon, is an important aspect to further improve the AEMWE performance and should not be neglected . Here, for the first time we report a solution to solve this missing piece of the puzzle with a highly conductive novel multifunctional liquid/gas diffusion layers (LGDLs), which consisted of well-tuned pores to asynchronously transport electrons, heat and liquid/gas while minimizing ohmic, mass transport and interfacial losses. The ohmic and mass transfer losses were reduced by 48% and 58%, respectively, thanks to the developed multifunctional LGDL and as a result the performance increased by 13 % at 0.5 A cm-2 in water, which places AEMWE close in effectiveness to more mainstream alkaline electrolyzers but without the need of using corrosive alkaline solutions as electrolyte. This multifunctional LGDL, called NiMPL-PTL, was developed by introducing nickel based micro porous layers (MPLs) using atmospheric plasma spray (APS) technique on the top of a porous transport layer (PTL) substrate. The low tortuosity of this novel porous NiMPL-PTL can reduce capillary pressure and bubble point, which can efficiently remove the unavoidable gas bubbles formed at electrode surface. Moreover, this NiMPL-PTL can decrease the contact resistance, since it increases the contact area between PTL and membrane electrode assembly (MEA) by reducing the aperture size of the PTL. Therefore, a significant mitigation of mass transport issues at high current densities and an improvement in interfacial contact resistance (ICR) were achieved by implementing NiMPL-PTL in the AEMWE operated in water. Electrochemical results showed that for AEMWE cell with well-tuned NiMPL-PTLs, the operating voltage required at the current density of 0.5 A cm-2 is as low as 1.90 V with an operating efficiency of 76%HHV, which was 290 mV lower than that of cell with the uncoated PTLs , which could only reach to efficiency of 65%HHV. To the best of our knowledge, there has been no such a genuine design of multifunctional coated backing layer PTL to improve the AEMWE performance in water.

[1]  D. Jacobson,et al.  Accelerating Bubble Detachment in Porous Transport Layers with Patterned Through-Pores , 2020 .

[2]  K. Friedrich,et al.  Elucidating the Performance Limitations of Alkaline Electrolyte Membrane Electrolysis: Dominance of Anion Concentration in Membrane Electrode Assembly , 2020 .

[3]  K. Friedrich,et al.  Improving plasma sprayed Raney-type nickel–molybdenum electrodes towards high-performance hydrogen evolution in alkaline medium , 2020, Scientific Reports.

[4]  E. Andreoli,et al.  Fundamentals of Gas Diffusion Electrodes and Electrolysers for Carbon Dioxide Utilisation: Challenges and Opportunities , 2020, Catalysts.

[5]  D. Pergolesi,et al.  Surface Segregation Acts as Surface Engineering for the Oxygen Evolution Reaction on Perovskite Oxides in Alkaline Media , 2020 .

[6]  F. Büchi,et al.  Transient and Steady State Two-Phase Flow in Anodic Porous Transport Layer of Proton Exchange Membrane Water Electrolyzer , 2020, Journal of The Electrochemical Society.

[7]  Joonhee Kang,et al.  TiO2/ZrO2 Nanoparticle Composites for Electrochemical Hydrogen Evolution , 2020 .

[8]  S. Shimpalee,et al.  Effects of the Transport/Catalyst Layer Interface and Catalyst Loading on Mass and Charge Transport Phenomena in Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Water Electrolysis Devices , 2020 .

[9]  E. Tsotsas,et al.  Steady-State Water Drainage by Oxygen in Anodic Porous Transport Layer of Electrolyzers: A 2D Pore Network Study , 2020, Processes.

[10]  Cy H. Fujimoto,et al.  Highly quaternized polystyrene ionomers for high performance anion exchange membrane water electrolysers , 2020 .

[11]  W. Schade,et al.  Femtosecond laser-induced surface structuring of the porous transport layers in proton exchange membrane water electrolysis , 2020, Journal of Materials Chemistry A.

[12]  L. Gubler,et al.  Understanding the effects of material properties and operating conditions on component aging in polymer electrolyte water electrolyzers , 2020 .

[13]  Xianghui Xiao,et al.  Interfacial analysis of a PEM electrolyzer using X-ray computed tomography , 2020, Sustainable Energy & Fuels.

[14]  V. Schulz,et al.  Temperature-dependent gas accumulation in polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzer porous transport layers , 2020 .

[15]  H. Gasteiger,et al.  Current Challenges in Catalyst Development for PEM Water Electrolyzers , 2020, Chemie Ingenieur Technik.

[16]  Jeremy L. Hitt,et al.  Renewable electricity storage using electrolysis , 2019, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[17]  S. Shiva Kumar,et al.  Hydrogen production by PEM water electrolysis – A review , 2019 .

[18]  F. Marone,et al.  Hierarchically Structured Porous Transport Layers for Polymer Electrolyte Water Electrolysis , 2019, Advanced Energy Materials.

[19]  D. Aili,et al.  Ion-solvating membranes as a new approach towards high rate alkaline electrolyzers , 2019, Energy & Environmental Science.

[20]  S. Holdcroft,et al.  High Performance Anion Exchange Membrane Electrolysis Using Plasma-Sprayed, Non-Precious-Metal Electrodes , 2019, ACS Applied Energy Materials.

[21]  A. Bazylak,et al.  Pore network modelling to enhance liquid water transport through porous transport layers for polymer electrolyte membrane electrolyzers , 2019, Journal of Power Sources.

[22]  Jesus Rodriguez,et al.  Simple and Precise Approach for Determination of Ohmic Contribution of Diaphragms in Alkaline Water Electrolysis , 2019, Membranes.

[23]  Wenge Li,et al.  Porosity and Its Significance in Plasma-Sprayed Coatings , 2019, Coatings.

[24]  Fatemeh Razmjooei,et al.  Highly Active Binder Free Plasma Sprayed Non-Noble Metal Electrodes for Anion Exchange Membrane Electrolysis at Different Reduced KOH Concentrations , 2019, ECS Transactions.

[25]  A. Bazylak,et al.  Establishing Accuracy of Watershed-Derived Pore Network Extraction for Characterizing In-Plane Effective Diffusivity in Thin Porous Layers , 2019, Journal of The Electrochemical Society.

[26]  Detlef Stolten,et al.  Initial approaches in benchmarking and round robin testing for proton exchange membrane water electrolyzers , 2019, International Journal of Hydrogen Energy.

[27]  Yifan Li,et al.  Wettability effects of thin titanium liquid/gas diffusion layers in proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells , 2019, Electrochimica Acta.

[28]  M. Bram,et al.  Manufacturing of Large‐Scale Titanium‐Based Porous Transport Layers for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Electrolysis by Tape Casting , 2019, Advanced Engineering Materials.

[29]  F. Büchi,et al.  Polymer Electrolyte Water Electrolysis: Correlating Porous Transport Layer Structural Properties and Performance: Part I. Tomographic Analysis of Morphology and Topology , 2019, Journal of The Electrochemical Society.

[30]  James L. Young,et al.  Performance enhancement of PEM electrolyzers through iridium-coated titanium porous transport layers , 2018, Electrochemistry Communications.

[31]  Zhichuan J. Xu,et al.  Heterostructured Electrocatalysts for Hydrogen Evolution Reaction Under Alkaline Conditions , 2018, Nano-Micro Letters.

[32]  N. Briguglio,et al.  Electrochemical Impedance Spectroscopy as a Diagnostic Tool in Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Electrolysis , 2018, Materials.

[33]  Development of dynamic simulator of alkaline water electrolyzer for optimizing renewable energy systems , 2018 .

[34]  S. Shanmugam,et al.  CoS2–TiO2 hybrid nanostructures: efficient and durable bifunctional electrocatalysts for alkaline electrolyte membrane water electrolyzers , 2018 .

[35]  Dmitri Bessarabov,et al.  Low cost hydrogen production by anion exchange membrane electrolysis: A review , 2018 .

[36]  Samuel Simon Araya,et al.  Model-supported characterization of a PEM water electrolysis cell for the effect of compression , 2018 .

[37]  K. A. Friedrich,et al.  Comprehensive investigation of novel pore-graded gas diffusion layers for high-performance and cost-effective proton exchange membrane electrolyzers , 2017 .

[38]  Y. Sung,et al.  A Review on Membranes and Catalysts for Anion Exchange Membrane Water Electrolysis Single Cells , 2017 .

[39]  S. Retterer,et al.  In situ investigation on ultrafast oxygen evolution reactions of water splitting in proton exchange membrane electrolyzer cells , 2017 .

[40]  W. Tillmann,et al.  Porosity Characterization and Its Effect on Thermal Properties of APS-Sprayed Alumina Coatings , 2017, Coatings.

[41]  K. A. Friedrich,et al.  Low-Cost and Durable Bipolar Plates for Proton Exchange Membrane Electrolyzers , 2017, Scientific Reports.

[42]  Y. H. Jang,et al.  Fe-Treated Heteroatom (S/N/B/P)-Doped Graphene Electrocatalysts for Water Oxidation , 2017 .

[43]  M. Eikerling,et al.  How to Enhance Gas Removal from Porous Electrodes? , 2016, Scientific Reports.

[44]  Z. Ye,et al.  Improved gas diffusion within microchanneled cathode supports of SOECs for steam electrolysis , 2016 .

[45]  I. Flis-kabulska,et al.  Electroactivity of Ni–Fe cathodes in alkaline water electrolysis and effect of corrosion , 2016 .

[46]  Todd J. Toops,et al.  Discovery of true electrochemical reactions for ultrahigh catalyst mass activity in water splitting , 2016, Science Advances.

[47]  S. Shanmugam,et al.  Inexpensive electrochemical synthesis of nickel iron sulphides on nickel foam: super active and ultra-durable electrocatalysts for alkaline electrolyte membrane water electrolysis , 2016 .

[48]  K. Raeissi,et al.  Evaluation of Ni‐Mo and Ni‐Mo‐P Electroplated Coatings on Stainless Steel for PEM Fuel Cells Bipolar Plates , 2016 .

[49]  Uwe Reimer,et al.  An analysis of degradation phenomena in polymer electrolyte membrane water electrolysis , 2016 .

[50]  Todd J. Toops,et al.  Thin liquid/gas diffusion layers for high-efficiency hydrogen production from water splitting , 2016 .

[51]  K. A. Friedrich,et al.  Protective coatings on stainless steel bipolar plates for proton exchange membrane (PEM) electrolysers , 2016 .

[52]  J. Franco,et al.  Water electrolysis with Zirfon® as separator and NaOH as electrolyte , 2015 .

[53]  L. J. Berchmans,et al.  Fabrication of spinel ferrite based alkaline anion exchange membrane water electrolysers for hydrogen production , 2015 .

[54]  Zhigang Shao,et al.  Investigations on degradation of the long-term proton exchange membrane water electrolysis stack , 2014 .

[55]  Shuang Xiao,et al.  A strongly coupled graphene and FeNi double hydroxide hybrid as an excellent electrocatalyst for the oxygen evolution reaction. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[56]  K. Ayers,et al.  Degradation of anion exchange membranes used for hydrogen production by ultrapure water electrolysis , 2014 .

[57]  M. Comotti,et al.  Highly efficient platinum group metal free based membrane-electrode assembly for anion exchange membrane water electrolysis. , 2014, Angewandte Chemie.

[58]  K. S. Dhathathreyan,et al.  Graphene oxide modified non-noble metal electrode for alkaline anion exchange membrane water electrolyzers , 2013 .

[59]  Chaoyang Wang,et al.  Characterization of Anion Exchange Membrane Technology for Low Cost Electrolysis , 2013 .

[60]  César A.C. Sequeira,et al.  Hydrogen production by alkaline water electrolysis , 2013 .

[61]  K. Scott,et al.  A polymethacrylate-based quaternary ammonium OH- ionomer binder for non-precious metal alkaline anion exchange membrane water electrolysers , 2012 .

[62]  Lin Zhuang,et al.  First implementation of alkaline polymer electrolyte water electrolysis working only with pure water , 2012 .

[63]  Chaoyang Wang,et al.  Solid-state water electrolysis with an alkaline membrane. , 2012, Journal of the American Chemical Society.

[64]  K. Scott,et al.  Solid Acids as Electrolyte Materials for Proton Exchange Membrane (PEM) Electrolysis: Review , 2012 .

[65]  Xiaohong Li,et al.  Prospects for alkaline zero gap water electrolysers for hydrogen production , 2011 .

[66]  Dongke Zhang,et al.  Recent progress in alkaline water electrolysis for hydrogen production and applications , 2010 .

[67]  B. Yi,et al.  Electrochemical investigation of electrocatalysts for the oxygen evolution reaction in PEM water electrolyzers , 2008 .

[68]  Bing Yang,et al.  Growth of Cr-Nitrides on commercial Ni–Cr and Fe–Cr base alloys to protect PEMFC bipolar plates , 2007 .

[69]  Steven J. Thorpe,et al.  Performance of alkaline fuel cells: A possible future energy system? , 2006 .

[70]  S. Grigoriev,et al.  Pure hydrogen production by PEM electrolysis for hydrogen energy , 2006 .

[71]  I. Baranova,et al.  Optimization of porous current collectors for PEM water electrolysers , 2006 .

[72]  Tae-Hee Lee,et al.  Influence of pore-size distribution of diffusion layer on mass-transport problems of proton exchange membrane fuel cells , 2002 .

[73]  Norman Epstein,et al.  On tortuosity and the tortuosity factor in flow and diffusion through porous media , 1989 .