The Effects of Sales Message and Suspicion of Ulterior Motives on Salesperson Evaluation

This research investigates the extent to which a salesperson's presentation and consumer suspicion of ulterior motive affect salesperson evaluations and purchase intentions. Study 1 indicates that a salesperson's presentation plays an essential role in confirming or discontinuing consumer suspicion and that this process has important implications in the formation of salesperson attitudes. Evidence from Study 2 demonstrates that these interaction effects are mediated by persuasion-motive attributions. The findings also support a direct link between attitude toward the salesperson and purchase intentions. Collectively, these results extend the persuasion literature by demonstrating that suspicion of motive is a dynamic state in which consumers entertain rival hypotheses about the salesperson (e.g., is the salesperson truly motivated to help me, or motivated to make his or her commission?) and that, depending on the degree of suspicion, the same salesperson's tactics will be processed very differently by consumers.

[1]  Rohini Ahluwalia.  Examination of psychological processes underlying resistance to persuasion , 2000 .

[2]  J. Edell,et al.  The Power of Feelings in Understanding Advertising Effects , 1987 .

[3]  Ad van Knippenberg,et al.  The Sovereignty of Negative Inferences: Suspicion of Ulterior Motives Does Not Reduce the Negativity Effect , 1994 .

[4]  S. Fein,et al.  Judging others in the shadow of suspicion , 1994 .

[5]  Wayne D. Hoyer,et al.  An Integrative Framework for Understanding Two-sided Persuasion , 1994 .

[6]  Barton A. Weitz.  Effectiveness in sales interactions: A contingency framework. , 1981 .

[7]  Margaret C. Campbell,et al.  Goal Seeker and Persuasion Sentry: How Consumer Targets Respond to Interpersonal Marketing Persuasion , 2004 .

[8]  V. Folkes.  Consumer Reactions to Product Failure: An Attributional Approach , 1984 .

[9]  Peter Wright,et al.  Marketplace Metacognition and Social Intelligence , 2002 .

[10]  S. Chaiken,et al.  Causal inferences about communicators and their effect on opinion change , 1978 .

[11]  Jerry R. Goolsby,et al.  Personal communication in marketing: An examination of self-interest contingency relationships. , 1990 .

[12]  Amna Kirmani,et al.  Consumers' Use of Persuasion Knowledge: The Effects of Accessibility and Cognitive Capacity on Perceptions of an Influence Agent , 2000 .

[13]  J. Bettman,et al.  Effects of Consumer Expectations on Information Processing in Selling Encounters , 1986 .

[14]  R. Vonk,et al.  The slime effect : Suspicion and dislike of likeable behavior toward superiors , 1998 .

[15]  S. Folkman,et al.  The impact of daily stress on health and mood: psychological and social resources as mediators. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[16]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Suspicion of ulterior motivation and the correspondence bias. , 1990, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[17]  James M. Munch,et al.  The Effects of Argument Structure and Affective Tagging on Product Attitude Formation , 1993 .

[18]  J. Forgas.  On being happy and mistaken: mood effects on the fundamental attribution error. , 1998, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[19]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Selling: Building Partnerships , 1992 .

[20]  Karl G. Jöreskog,et al.  Lisrel 8: User's Reference Guide , 1997 .

[21]  V. Folkes.  Recent Attribution Research in Consumer Behavior: A Review and New Directions , 1988 .

[22]  Daniel Romer,et al.  Using Drama to Persuade , 1989 .

[23]  Dale T. Miller,et al.  Suspicion and Dispositional Inference , 1993 .

[24]  Franziska Marquart,et al.  Communication and persuasion : central and peripheral routes to attitude change , 1988 .

[25]  S. Fein.  Effects of suspicion on attributional thinking and the correspondence bias , 1996 .

[26]  M. F. Luce,et al.  Choosing to Avoid: Coping with Negatively Emotion-Laden Consumer Decisions , 1998 .

[27]  Thomas E. DeCarlo,et al.  Impact of Salesperson Attraction on Sales Managers’ Attributions and Feedback , 1996 .

[28]  Richard J. Lutz,et al.  The Role of Argument Quality in the Elaboration Likelihood Model , 1988 .

[29]  S. Folkman,et al.  Coping as a mediator of emotion. , 1988, Journal of personality and social psychology.

[30]  E. E. Jones,et al.  From Acts To Dispositions The Attribution Process In Person Perception1 , 1965 .

[31]  Carl Obermiller,et al.  Varieties of Mere Exposure: The Effects of Processing Style and Repetition on Affective Response , 1985 .

[32]  Harish Sujan,et al.  Smarter versus Harder: An Exploratory Attributional Analysis of Salespeople's Motivation , 1986 .

[33]  D. Hilton.  THE SOCIAL CONTEXT OF REASONING : CONVERSATIONAL INFERENCE AND RATIONAL JUDGMENT , 1995 .

[34]  Angelo S. DeNisi,et al.  A cognitive view of the performance appraisal process: A model and research propositions , 1984 .

[35]  I. Ajzen,et al.  Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social Behavior , 1980 .

[36]  B. Bushman,et al.  Violence and sex impair memory for television ads. , 2002, The Journal of applied psychology.

[37]  Eric R. Spangenberg,et al.  Development of a Scale to Measure Consumer Skepticism Toward Advertising , 1998 .

[38]  Barton A. Weitz,et al.  Knowledge, motivation, and adaptive behavior : a framework for improving selling effectiveness , 1986 .

[39]  Peter Wright,et al.  Persuasion Knowledge , 2022 .

[40]  Gregory M. Rose,et al.  Adolescent Skepticism toward TV Advertising and Knowledge of Advertiser Tactics , 1994 .

[41]  Kenneth A. Bollen,et al.  Structural Equations with Latent Variables , 1989 .