Factors affecting information system volatility

The objective of this research is to investigate the effect that various factors have on an information system’s life span by understanding how the factors affect an information system’s stability. The research builds on a previously developed two-stage model of information system change whereby an information system is either in a stable state of evolution in which the information system’s functionality is evolving, or in a state of revolution, in which the information system is being replaced because it is not providing the functionality expected by its users. A case study surveyed a number of systems within one organization. The aim was to test whether a relationship existed between the base value of the volatility index and certain system characteristics. Data relating to some 3,000 user change requests covering 40 systems over a 10-year period were obtained. The following factors were hypothesized to have significant associations with the base value of the volatility index: semantic relativism (generation of language of construction), system size, system age, and the timing of changes applied to a system. Significant associations were found in the hypothesized directions except the timing of user changes was not associated with any change in the value of the volatility index.

[1]  Henk Sol,et al.  Information Systems Methodologies: A Framework for Understanding , 1988 .

[2]  Sunny Marche,et al.  Measuring the stability of data models , 1993 .

[3]  Donald J. McCubbrey,et al.  Foundations of Business Systems , 1991 .

[4]  T. Bowler TREATISE ON BASIC PHILOSOPHY, VOLUME 4, ONTOLOGY II: A WORLD OF SYSTEMS, Mario Bunge, D. Reidel Publishing Company, Boston, 1979. 291 pp. , 1980 .

[5]  E. Burton Swanson,et al.  The dimensions of maintenance , 1976, ICSE '76.

[6]  Jon A. Turner,et al.  Observations on the Use of Behavioral Models in Information Systems Research and Practice , 1982, Inf. Manag..

[7]  James Martin,et al.  Software Maintenance: The Problem and Its Solutions , 1983 .

[8]  Ron Weber,et al.  On the deep structure of information systems , 1995, Inf. Syst. J..

[9]  Stephanie Lester,et al.  Maintaining information systems in organizations , 1990, Journal of Information and Technology.

[10]  Chris F. Kemerer,et al.  Software complexity and software maintenance: A survey of empirical research , 1995, Ann. Softw. Eng..

[11]  Noam Chomsky,et al.  वाक्यविन्यास का सैद्धान्तिक पक्ष = Aspects of the theory of syntax , 1965 .

[12]  Jon Heales,et al.  An Empirical Analysis of Information Systems Changes , 1995, ICIS.

[13]  M.M. Lehman,et al.  Programs, life cycles, and laws of software evolution , 1980, Proceedings of the IEEE.

[14]  Albert L. Lederer,et al.  Nine management guidelines for better cost estimating , 1992, CACM.

[15]  Leslie Will cocks It evaluation: Managing the catch 22 , 1992 .

[16]  Sasa M. Dekleva,et al.  The Influence of the Information Systems Development Approach on Maintenance , 1992, MIS Q..

[17]  Jonathan. Heales,et al.  Evolutionary and revolutionary maintenance of information systems: a theoretical and empirical analysis , 1998 .

[18]  Kalle Lyytinen,et al.  Different perspectives on information systems: problems and solutions , 1987, CSUR.

[19]  Fèlix Saltor,et al.  Diversity with Cooperation in Database Schemata: Semantic Relativism , 1993, ICIS.

[20]  Rajiv D. Banker,et al.  A model to evaluate variables impacting the productivity of software maintenance projects , 1991 .

[21]  Lowell Jay Arthur Software evolution: the software maintenance challenge , 1988 .

[22]  Meir M. Lehman,et al.  A Model of Large Program Development , 1976, IBM Syst. J..

[23]  S DexterAlbert,et al.  A model for measuring information system size , 1991 .