Statistical Learning and Language: An Individual Differences Study

Although statistical learning and language have been assumed to be intertwined, this theoretical presupposition has rarely been tested empirically. The present study investigates the relationship between statistical learning and language using a within-subject design embedded in an individual-differences framework. Participants were administered separate statistical learning tasks involving adjacent and nonadjacent dependencies, along with a language comprehension task and a battery of other measures assessing verbal working memory, short-term memory, vocabulary, reading experience, cognitive motivation, and fluid intelligence. Strong interrelationships were found among statistical learning, verbal working memory, and language comprehension. However, when the effects of all other factors were controlled for, performance on the two statistical learning tasks was the only predictor for comprehending relevant types of natural language sentences.

[1]  Gary S Dell,et al.  Limits on learning phonotactic constraints from recent production experience. , 2008, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[2]  J. Kroll,et al.  Handbook of bilingualism : psycholinguistic approaches , 2005 .

[3]  Heidi Waterfall,et al.  Emergence of syntax: commonalities and differences across children. , 2008, Developmental science.

[4]  Vera Kempe,et al.  Cognitive Predictors of Generalization of Russian Grammatical Gender Categories , 2010 .

[5]  Alan Juffs,et al.  Representation, Processing and Working Memory in a Second Language , 2004 .

[6]  Richard C. Anderson,et al.  How Many Words are There in Printed School English , 1984 .

[7]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of adjacent and nonadjacent dependencies among nonlinguistic sounds , 2009, Psychonomic bulletin & review.

[8]  Nick Chater,et al.  Reduction of Uncertainty in Human Sequential Learning: Evidence from Artificial Grammar Learning , 2003 .

[9]  A. Baddeley,et al.  The phonological loop as a language learning device. , 1998, Psychological review.

[10]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Exposure to print and orthographic processing. , 1989 .

[11]  Michael J Cortese,et al.  Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2011 .

[12]  Erica B. Michael,et al.  Being and Becoming Bilingual: Individual Differences and Consequences for Language Production. , 2005 .

[13]  Uta Frith,et al.  Evidence for implicit sequence learning in dyslexia. , 2002, Dyslexia.

[14]  Michael J. Spivey,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics , 2012 .

[15]  Keith E. Stanovich,et al.  Reading in the Real World and Its Correlates. , 1993 .

[16]  Rebecca L. Gómez,et al.  Statistical learning in infant language development , 2007 .

[17]  Elizabeth K. Johnson,et al.  Statistical learning of tone sequences by human infants and adults , 1999, Cognition.

[18]  Daniel J. Acheson,et al.  New and updated tests of print exposure and reading abilities in college students , 2008, Behavior research methods.

[19]  E. Newport,et al.  Learning at a distance I. Statistical learning of non-adjacent dependencies , 2004, Cognitive Psychology.

[20]  J. Cacioppo,et al.  The need for cognition. , 1982 .

[21]  R. Gómez,et al.  Infant artificial language learning and language acquisition , 2000, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[22]  Karsten Steinhauer,et al.  Brain signatures of artificial language processing: Evidence challenging the critical period hypothesis , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[23]  G. Dell,et al.  Speech errors, phonotactic constraints, and implicit learning: a study of the role of experience in language production. , 2000, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[24]  R. Gómez,et al.  A first step in form-based category abstraction by 12-month-old infants. , 2004, Developmental science.

[25]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Sequential Expectations: The Role of Prediction-Based Learning in Language , 2010, Top. Cogn. Sci..

[26]  Rod Ellis,et al.  Individual Differences in Second Language Learning , 2008 .

[27]  S. McAdams,et al.  Implicit learning of musical timbre sequences: statistical regularities confronted with acoustical (dis)similarities. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[28]  R. Aslin,et al.  Statistical phonetic learning in infants: facilitation and feature generalization. , 2008, Developmental science.

[29]  J. Saffran,et al.  From Syllables to Syntax: Multilevel Statistical Learning by 12-Month-Old Infants , 2003 .

[30]  K. Stanovich.  Matthew Effects in Reading: Some Consequences of Individual Differences in the Acquisition of Literacy , 2009 .

[31]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Neural Responses to Structural Incongruencies in Language and Statistical Learning Point to Similar Underlying Mechanisms , 2007 .

[32]  James L. McClelland,et al.  Learning the structure of event sequences. , 1991, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[33]  Vera Kempe,et al.  The role of learner and input variables in learning inflectional morphology , 2006, Applied Psycholinguistics.

[34]  E. Newport,et al.  PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE Research Article INCIDENTAL LANGUAGE LEARNING: Ustening (and Learning) out of the Comer of Your Ear , 2022 .

[35]  L. Gerken,et al.  Infants can use distributional cues to form syntactic categories , 2005, Journal of Child Language.

[36]  R. Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of higher-order temporal structure from visual shape sequences. , 2002, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[37]  P McGeorge,et al.  The relationships between psychometric intelligence and learning in an explicit and an implicit task. , 1997, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[38]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Reassessing working memory: comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996). , 2002, Psychological review.

[39]  Christopher M. Conway,et al.  Implicit statistical learning in language processing: Word predictability is the key , 2010, Cognition.

[40]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Frequency effects in language acquisition: A review with implications for theories of implicit and explicit language acquisition. (Target article) , 2002 .

[41]  D. McNamara,et al.  Proceedings of the 29th Annual Cognitive Science Society , 2007 .

[42]  J. Saffran.  The Use of Predictive Dependencies in Language Learning , 2001 .

[43]  G. Waters,et al.  The Measurement of Verbal Working Memory Capacity and Its Relation to Reading Comprehension , 1996, The Quarterly journal of experimental psychology. A, Human experimental psychology.

[44]  A. Reber.  Implicit learning of artificial grammars , 1967 .

[45]  Gary S Dell,et al.  Speech errors reflect newly learned phonotactic constraints. , 2006, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[46]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Impaired artificial grammar learning in agrammatism , 2010, Cognition.

[47]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Phonological typicality influences on-line sentence comprehension , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences.

[48]  K. Stanovich,et al.  Knowledge growth and maintenance across the life span : the role of print exposure , 1995 .

[49]  P. Perruchet,et al.  Children's implicit learning of graphotactic and morphological regularities. , 2005, Child development.

[50]  Robert F. Allen,et al.  Individual differences in implicit learning: Implications for the evolution of consciousness , 2000 .

[51]  Rebecca L Gómez,et al.  The effects of variation on learning word order rules by adults with and without language-based learning disabilities. , 2006, Journal of communication disorders.

[52]  R. Cattell,et al.  Abilities : Their Structure , Growth , and Action , 2015 .

[53]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  On-Line Individual Differences in Statistical Learning Predict Language Processing , 2010, Front. Psychology.

[54]  Camilla Anne Czubaj.  The Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale - Revised, Revisited , 1996 .

[55]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Experience and sentence processing: Statistical learning and relative clause comprehension , 2009, Cognitive Psychology.

[56]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Reassessing Working Memory: Comment on Just and Carpenter (1992) and Waters and Caplan (1996) , 2002 .

[57]  R. Gómez,et al.  Sensitivity to word order cues by normal and language/learning disabled adults. , 2002, Journal of communication disorders.

[58]  Whitney Tabor,et al.  Speaking Up for Vocabulary , 2007, Journal of learning disabilities.

[59]  Arthur S. Reber,et al.  Implicit and explicit learning: individual differences and IQ. , 1991 .

[60]  Mark Sawyer,et al.  L2 Working Memory Capacity and L2 Reading Skill , 1992, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[61]  C. Spearman,et al.  "THE ABILITIES OF MAN". , 1928, Science.

[62]  D. Shanks.  IMPLICIT LEARNING AND TACIT KNOWLEDGE - AN ESSAY ON THE COGNITIVE UNCONSCIOUS - REBER,A , 1995 .

[63]  Catherine E. Snow,et al.  Learning Words From Books , 2003 .

[64]  Joanne Arciuli,et al.  Statistical learning in typically developing children: the role of age and speed of stimulus presentation. , 2011, Developmental science.

[65]  Jeffrey D. Karpicke,et al.  Using immediate memory span , 2004, Memory & cognition.

[66]  S. Krashen.  We Acquire Vocabulary and Spelling by Reading: Additional Evidence for the Input Hypothesis , 1989 .

[67]  R. Gómez.  Variability and Detection of Invariant Structure , 2002, Psychological science.

[68]  Sarah C. Creel,et al.  Distant melodies: statistical learning of nonadjacent dependencies in tone sequences. , 2004, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[69]  P. Robinson.  COGNITIVE ABILITIES, CHUNK-STRENGTH, AND FREQUENCY EFFECTS IN IMPLICIT ARTIFICIAL GRAMMAR AND INCIDENTAL L2 LEARNING: REPLICATIONS OF REBER, WALKENFELD, AND HERNSTADT (1991) AND KNOWLTON AND SQUIRE (1996) AND THEIR RELEVANCE FOR SLA , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[70]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Modality-constrained statistical learning of tactile, visual, and auditory sequences. , 2005, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[71]  P. Skehan.  Individual Differences in Second Language Learning , 1989, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[72]  Paula M. Winke,et al.  THE PSYCHOLOGY OF THE LANGUAGE LEARNER: INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION , 2005, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[73]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  Statistical learning of probabilistic nonadjacent dependencies by multiple-cue integration , 2012 .

[74]  P. Perruchet,et al.  Implicit learning and statistical learning: one phenomenon, two approaches , 2006, Trends in Cognitive Sciences.

[75]  R. Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning in a serial reaction time task: access to separable statistical cues by individual learners. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[76]  J. Saffran.  Statistical Language Learning , 2003 .

[77]  Dare A. Baldwin,et al.  Segmenting dynamic human action via statistical structure , 2008, Cognition.

[78]  Alan Davies,et al.  Handbook of Applied Linguistics , 2003 .

[79]  Julia L. Evans,et al.  Can Infants Map Meaning to Newly Segmented Words? , 2007, Psychological science.

[80]  Morten H. Christiansen,et al.  The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics: Individual Differences in Sentence Processing , 2012 .

[81]  Jessica Maye,et al.  Infant sensitivity to distributional information can affect phonetic discrimination , 2002, Cognition.

[82]  Arthur S Reber,et al.  Implicit Learning in Children and Adults With Williams Syndrome , 2003, Developmental neuropsychology.

[83]  Susan M. Garnsey,et al.  Semantic Influences On Parsing: Use of Thematic Role Information in Syntactic Ambiguity Resolution , 1994 .

[84]  M. Goldsmith,et al.  Statistical Learning by 8-Month-Old Infants , 1996 .

[85]  Nick C. Ellis,et al.  Sequencing in SLA , 1996, Studies in Second Language Acquisition.

[86]  Robert H. Logie,et al.  Components of fluent reading , 1985 .

[87]  Julia L. Evans,et al.  Statistical learning in children with specific language impairment. , 2009, Journal of speech, language, and hearing research : JSLHR.

[88]  N. Mackintosh,et al.  Psychometric intelligence dissociates implicit and explicit learning. , 2007, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[89]  J. Woolley,et al.  Paradigms and processes in reading comprehension. , 1982, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[90]  James S. Magnuson,et al.  The link between statistical segmentation and word learning in adults , 2008, Cognition.

[91]  E. Pothos,et al.  Investigating learning deficits associated with dyslexia. , 2004, Dyslexia.

[92]  Robert Plomin,et al.  Genetic evidence for bidirectional effects of early lexical and grammatical development. , 2003, Child development.

[93]  P. J. Brooks,et al.  Second Language Learning of Complex Inflectional Systems , 2008 .

[94]  Nick Chater,et al.  Variability is the spice of learning, and a crucial ingredient for detecting and generalizing in nonadjacent dependencies , 2004 .

[95]  Karl Magnus Petersson,et al.  Artificial syntactic violations activate Broca's region , 2004 .

[96]  Christopher M. Conway,et al.  Neurocognitive Basis of Implicit Learning of Sequential Structure and Its Relation to Language Processing , 2008, Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.

[97]  R. Gómez,et al.  The Developmental Trajectory of Nonadjacent Dependency Learning. , 2005, Infancy : the official journal of the International Society on Infant Studies.

[98]  L. Squire,et al.  Artificial grammar learning depends on implicit acquisition of both abstract and exemplar-specific information. , 1996, Journal of experimental psychology. Learning, memory, and cognition.

[99]  A. Anwander,et al.  The brain differentiates human and non-human grammars: Functional localization and structural connectivity , 2006, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[100]  Richard N Aslin,et al.  Statistical learning of new visual feature combinations by infants , 2002, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America.

[101]  Axel Cleeremans,et al.  Implicit learning out of the lab: the case of orthographic regularities. , 2001, Journal of experimental psychology. General.

[102]  E. Bates,et al.  INDIVIDUAL DIFFERENCES AND THEIR IMPLICATIONS FOR THEORIES OF LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT , 1995 .